Ann Rehabil Med.  2015 Apr;39(2):199-209. 10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.199.

Changes in Hyolaryngeal Movement and Swallowing Function After Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Dysphagia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. srcho918@yuhs.ac
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Avison Biomedical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate immediate changes in hyolaryngeal movement and swallowing function after a cycle of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on both submental and throat regions and submental placement alone in patients with dysphagia.
METHODS
Fifteen patients with dysphagia were recruited. First, videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) was performed before NMES. All patients thereafter received a cycle of NMES by 2 methods of electrode placement: 1) both submental and throat regions and 2) submental placement alone concomitant with VFSS. The Penetration-Aspiration Score (PAS) and the NIH-Swallowing Safety Scale (NIH-SSS) were measured for swallowing function.
RESULTS
During swallowing, hyolaryngeal descent significantly occurred by NMES on both submental and throat regions, and anterior displacement of hyolaryngeal complex was significant on submental placement alone. NMES on submental placement alone did not change the PAS and NIH-SSS. However, NMES on both submental and throat regions significantly reduced the NIH-SSS, although it did not change the PAS. Patients with no brainstem lesion and with dysphagia duration of <3 months showed significantly improved the NIH-SSS.
CONCLUSION
Immediate hyolaryngeal movement was paradoxically depressed after NMES on both submental and throat regions with significant reductions in the NIH-SSS but not the PAS, suggesting improvement in pharyngeal peristalsis and cricopharyngeal functions at the esophageal entry rather than decreased aspiration and penetration. The results also suggested that patients with dysphagia should be carefully screened when determining motor-level NMES.

Keyword

Deglutition; Electric stimulation; Hyoid bone; Larynx

MeSH Terms

Brain Stem
Deglutition Disorders*
Deglutition*
Electric Stimulation*
Electrodes
Humans
Hyoid Bone
Larynx
Peristalsis
Pharynx

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The electrode positions relative to hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage. (A) Electrodes placement in both submental and throat regions. The top pair was placed horizontally in the submental region over the region of the mylohyoid muscle above the hyoid bone. The bottom pair was placed on the skin over the thyroid cartilage on either side of the midline over the region of the thyrohyoid muscle medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle. (B) Electrodes in submental placement alone. Both pairs of horizontally arranged electrode were placed in the skin overlying the submental region.

  • Fig. 2 Change in dysphagia rating scale after neuromuscular electrical stimulation. (A) There was no significant difference in the PAS after NMES on both submental and throat area and submental placement alone. (B) Application to both submental and throat regions significantly decreased the NIH-SSS (*p<0.05), in contrast to the finding that submental placement alone did not change the dysphagia rating scores. PAS, Penetration-Aspiration Score; NIH-SSS, National Institutes of Health-Swallowing Safety Scale; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

  • Fig. 3 Change in dysphagia rating scale according to the presence of brainstem lesion. (A, B) In the PAS, there was no significant difference after NMES on both submental and throat area and submental placement alone regardless of the brainstem lesion. (C) In the NIH-SSS, patients with no brainstem lesion in whom NMES was applied to both submental and throat regions showed significantly decreased scores (*p<0.05), whereas submental placement alone did not change the scores in the same patients. (D) On the other hand, patients with brainstem lesion did not show significant change in the NIH-SSS after NMES in both placement methods. PAS, Penetration-Aspiration Score; NIH-SSS, National Institutes of Health-Swallowing Safety Scale; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

  • Fig. 4 Change in dysphagia rating scale according to the duration of dysphagia. (A, B) In the PAS, there was no significant difference after NMES on both submental and throat area and submental placement alone irrespective of the duration of dysphagia. (C) In the NIH-SSS, patients whose dysphagia duration was <3 months showed significant decrease in the NIH-SSS after NMES on both submental and throat area (*p<0.05), whereas submental placement alone did not change the scores in the same patients. (D) On the other hand, subjects whose duration of dysphagia was >3 months did not show a significant change in the NIH-SSS after NMES in both placement methods. PAS, Penetration-Aspiration Score; NIH-SSS, National Institutes of Health-Swallowing Safety Scale; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.


Reference

1. Ertekin C, Aydogdu I. Neurophysiology of swallowing. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003; 114:2226–2244. PMID: 14652082.
Article
2. Ludlow CL, Humbert I, Saxon K, Poletto C, Sonies B, Crujido L. Effects of surface electrical stimulation both at rest and during swallowing in chronic pharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2007; 22:1–10. PMID: 16718620.
Article
3. Park JW, Oh JC, Lee HJ, Park SJ, Yoon TS, Kwon BS. Effortful swallowing training coupled with electrical stimulation leads to an increase in hyoid elevation during swallowing. Dysphagia. 2009; 24:296–301. PMID: 19255707.
Article
4. Shaw GY, Sechtem PR, Searl J, Keller K, Rawi TA, Dowdy E. Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (VitalStim) curative therapy for severe dysphagia: myth or reality? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007; 116:36–44. PMID: 17305276.
Article
5. Blumenfeld L, Hahn Y, Lepage A, Leonard R, Belafsky PC. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation versus traditional dysphagia therapy: a nonconcurrent cohort study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135:754–757. PMID: 17071307.
Article
6. Humbert IA, Poletto CJ, Saxon KG, Kearney PR, Crujido L, Wright-Harp W, et al. The effect of surface electrical stimulation on hyolaryngeal movement in normal individuals at rest and during swallowing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006; 101:1657–1663. PMID: 16873602.
Article
7. Kiger M, Brown CS, Watkins L. Dysphagia management: an analysis of patient outcomes using VitalStim therapy compared to traditional swallow therapy. Dysphagia. 2006; 21:243–253. PMID: 17216386.
Article
8. Bulow M, Speyer R, Baijens L, Woisard V, Ekberg O. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in stroke patients with oral and pharyngeal dysfunction. Dysphagia. 2008; 23:302–309. PMID: 18437464.
Article
9. Tan C, Liu Y, Li W, Liu J, Chen L. Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation can improve swallowing function in patients with dysphagia caused by non-stroke diseases: a meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40:472–480. PMID: 23607530.
Article
10. Carnaby-Mann GD, Crary MA. Examining the evidence on neuromuscular electrical stimulation for swallowing: a meta-analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133:564–571. PMID: 17576907.
11. Palmer JB, Kuhlemeier KV, Tippett DC, Lynch C. A protocol for the videofluorographic swallowing study. Dysphagia. 1993; 8:209–214. PMID: 8359040.
Article
12. Wijting Y, Freed ML. VitalStim therapy training manual. Hixson, TN: Chattanooga Group;2003. p. 103.
13. Abramoff MD, Magalhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 2004; 11:36–43.
14. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996; 11:93–98. PMID: 8721066.
Article
15. Hamdy S, Rothwell JC, Aziz Q, Thompson DG. Organization and reorganization of human swallowing motor cortex: implications for recovery after stroke. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000; 99:151–157. PMID: 10918049.
Article
16. Hamdy S, Rothwell JC. Gut feelings about recovery after stroke: the organization and reorganization of human swallowing motor cortex. Trends Neurosci. 1998; 21:278–282. PMID: 9683316.
Article
17. Bath PM, Bath FJ, Smithard DG. Interventions for dysphagia in acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (2):CD000323. PMID: 10796343.
Article
18. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Shah V, Ha T. Upper esophageal sphincter opening and modulation during swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1989; 97:1469–1478. PMID: 2583413.
Article
19. Ludlow CL. Electrical neuromuscular stimulation in dysphagia: current status. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 18:159–164. PMID: 20463480.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr