Korean J Obstet Gynecol.  2006 Aug;49(8):1655-1659.

Differences of EDR Chemoresistance Assay and Prognosis between Recurrent Micropapillary Serous Ovarian Carcinoma and Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Korea. mscha@dau.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to identify chemoresistance and prognosis differences between recurrent micropapillary serous ovarian carcinoma (MPSC) and serous ovarian carcinoma.
METHODS
The Extreme drug resistance (EDR) assay was performed in 13 recurrent micropapillary serous ovarian carcinoma and 56 recurrent serous ovarian carcinoma.
RESULTS
Mean age of MPSC and Serous ovarian cancer were 41.1 and 58.0 respectively (p<0.05). Etoposide and Doxil were the two least resistance chemotherapeutic agents to recurrent MPSC but the most resistance agents to recurrent serous ovarian cancer. Taxol and cisplatin were the two most resistance agents to MPSC. The mean follow up was 42 months (range 1-173) The five-year overall survival rate of MPSC and serous ovarian carcinoma were 71.6% and 33.9% respectively. The mean survival were 136 months in MPSC compared with 72 months in serous ovarian carcinoma (p<0.035).
CONCLUSION
In this retrospective analysis, MPSC showed very different in EDR results and favorable prognosis compare to serous ovarian carcinoma.

Keyword

Micropapillary serous ovarian cancer (MPSC); Serous ovarian carcinoma; Extreme drug resistance assay (EDR); Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Cisplatin
Drug Resistance
Etoposide
Follow-Up Studies
Ovarian Neoplasms
Paclitaxel
Prognosis*
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Cisplatin
Etoposide
Paclitaxel
Full Text Links
  • KJOG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr