Ann Rehabil Med.  2013 Feb;37(1):88-95. 10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.88.

Somatosensory Findings of Pusher Syndrome in Stroke Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dong-A University College of Medicine and Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea. easy0318@naver.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the somatosensory findings of pusher syndrome in stroke patients.
METHODS
Twelve pusher patients and twelve non-pusher patients were enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria were unilateral stroke, sufficient cognitive abilities to understand and follow instructions, and no visual problem. Patients were evaluated for pusher syndrome using a standardized scale for contraversive pushing. Somatosensory finding was assessed by the Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index (CSII) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) at 1 and 14 weeks after the stroke onset. Data of SEPs with median and tibial nerve stimulation were classified into the normal, abnormal, and no response group.
RESULTS
In the baseline characteristics (sex, lesion character, and side) of both groups, significant differences were not found. The score of CSII decreased in both groups at 14 weeks (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in the CSII scores between the two groups at 1 and 14 weeks. There were no significant differences in SEPs between the two groups at 1 and 14 weeks after the stroke onset.
CONCLUSION
It appears that somatosensory input plays a relatively minor role in pusher syndrome. Further study will be required to reveal the mechanism of pusher syndrome.

Keyword

Pusher syndrome; Stroke; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index

MeSH Terms

Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory
Humans
Stroke
Tibial Nerve

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The enrollment algorithm for the subjects from May 2010 to August 2011. The 24 patients included in the study were among the 131 stroke patients. PS, pusher syndrome; CSII, Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index; SEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials.

  • Fig. 2 Mean scores for the Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP) subscales (posture, abduction, resistance) at 1 and 14 weeks. (A) Experimental group and (B) control group. The values are expressed as mean±standard deviation.


Reference

1. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (4):CD000197. PMID: 17943737.
2. Dettmann MA, Linder MT, Sepic SB. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. Am J Phys Med. 1987; 66:77–90. PMID: 3578493.
3. Spinazzola L, Cubelli R, Della Sala S. Impairments of trunk movements following left or right hemisphere lesions: dissociation between apraxic errors and postural instability. Brain. 2003; 126(Pt 12):2656–2666. PMID: 12937080.
Article
4. Davies PM. Steps to follow: a guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. 1985. Berlin: Springer.
5. Karnath HO, Broetz D. Understanding and treating "pusher syndrome". Phys Ther. 2003; 83:1119–1125. PMID: 14640870.
Article
6. Karnath HO. Pusher syndrome: a frequent but little-known disturbance of body orientation perception. J Neurol. 2007; 254:415–424. PMID: 17385082.
7. Danells CJ, Black SE, Gladstone DJ, McIlroy WE. Post-stroke "pushing": natural history and relationship to motor and functional recovery. Stroke. 2004; 35:2873–2878. PMID: 15528459.
8. Karnath HO, Johannsen L, Broetz D, Ferber S, Dichgans J. Prognosis of contraversive pushing. J Neurol. 2002; 249:1250–1253. PMID: 12242549.
Article
9. Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The neural representation of postural control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97:13931–13936. PMID: 11087818.
Article
10. Bisdorff AR, Wolsley CJ, Anastasopoulos D, Bronstein AM, Gresty MA. The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders. Brain. 1996; 119(Pt 5):1523–1534. PMID: 8931577.
Article
11. Mittelstaedt H. Origin and processing of postural information. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998; 22:473–478. PMID: 9595557.
Article
12. Paci M, Baccini M, Rinaldi LA. Pusher behaviour: a critical review of controversial issues. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31:249–258. PMID: 18608360.
Article
13. Deshpande N, Metter EJ, Ferrucci L. Validity of clinically derived cumulative somatosensory impairment index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91:226–232. PMID: 20159126.
Article
14. Karnath HO, Brotz D, Gotz A. Clinical symptoms, origin, and therapy of the "pusher syndrome". Nervenarzt. 2001; 72:86–92. PMID: 11256159.
15. Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology. 2000; 55:1298–1304. PMID: 11087771.
Article
16. Pontelli TE, Pontes-Neto OM, Colafemina JF, Araujo DB, Santos AC, Leite JP. Posture control in pusher syndrome: influence of lateral semicircular canals. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 71:448–452. PMID: 16446958.
17. Kwon HK, Yim SK, Kim L, Chae SH, Lee HJ. Clinical usefulness of somatosensory evoked potentials in patients with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2003; 27:355–360.
18. Rhee IG, Kim HS, Nah YS, Ahn KH, Lee YG. The relationship between SEP patterns and motor recovery in stroke patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1987; 11:194–199.
19. Feys H, Van Hees J, Bruyninckx F, Mercelis R, De Weerdt W. Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000; 68:323–331. PMID: 10675214.
Article
20. Gott PS, Karnaze DS, Fisher M. Assessment of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1990; 21:1167–1171. PMID: 2389296.
Article
21. Vang C, Dunbabin D, Kilpatrick D. Correlation between functional and electrophysiological recovery in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999; 30:2126–2130. PMID: 10512917.
Article
22. Kim JH, Han TR, Lee CK. Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in hemiplegic patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1987; 11:119–129.
23. Clement G, Gurfinkel VS, Lestienne F, Lipshits MI, Popov KE. Adaptation of postural control to weightlessness. Exp Brain Res. 1984; 57:61–72. PMID: 6519230.
Article
24. Baier B, Janzen J, Muller-Forell W, Fechir M, Muller N, Dieterich M. Pusher syndrome: its cortical correlate. J Neurol. 2012; 259:277–283. PMID: 21830093.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr