Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Oct;38(5):665-672. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.665.

Correlations Between Electrically Quantified Pain Degree, Subjectively Assessed Visual Analogue Scale, and the McGill Pain Questionnaire: A Pilot Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dumitru1@hanyang.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical utility of the electrically calculated quantitative pain degree (QPD) and to correlate it with subjective assessments of pain degree including a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ).
METHODS
We recruited 25 patients with low back pain. Of them, 21 patients suffered from low back pain for more than 3 months. The QPD was calculated using the PainVision (PV, PS-2100; Nipro Co., Osaka, Japan). We applied electrodes to the medial forearm of the subjects and the electrical stimulus was amplified sequentially. Minimum perceived current (MPC) and pain equivalent current (PEC) were defined as minimum electrical stimulation that could be sensed by the subject and electrical stimulation that could trigger actual pain itself. To eliminate individual differences, we defined QPD as the following: QPD=PEC-MPC/MPC. We scored pre-treatment QPD three times at admission and post-treatment QPD once at discharge. The VAS, MPQ, and QPD were evaluated and correlations between the scales were analyzed.
RESULTS
Result showed significant test-retest reliability (ICC=0.967, p<0.001) and the correlation between QDP and MPQ was significant (at admission SRCC=0.619 and p=0.001; at discharge SRCC=0.628, p=0.001). However, the correlation between QPD and VAS was not significant (at admission SRCC=0.240, p=0.248; at discharge SRCC=0.289, p=0.161).
CONCLUSION
Numerical values measured with PV showed consistent results with repeated calculations. Electrically measured QPD showed an excellent correlation with MPQ but not with VAS. These results demonstrate that PV is a significantly reliable device for quantifying the intensity of low back pain.

Keyword

Low back pain; Pain measurement; Pain threshold

MeSH Terms

Electric Stimulation
Electrodes
Forearm
Humans
Individuality
Low Back Pain
Pain Measurement*
Pain Threshold
Pilot Projects*
Weights and Measures

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Attachment site of EL-BAND.

  • Fig. 2 Measurement of the quantitative pain degree by PainVision.

  • Fig. 3 Pain measurement results from PainVision.

  • Fig. 4 Correlation between MPQ and QPD at admission (A) and at discharge (B). MPQ, McGill pain questionnaire; QPD, quantitative pain degree; SRCC, Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

  • Fig. 5 Correlation between QPD and VAS at admission (A) and at discharge (B). VAS, visual analogue scale; QPD, quantitative pain degree; SRCC, Spearman rank correlation coefficient.


Reference

1. Elliott AM, Smith BH, Penny KI, Smith WC, Chambers WA. The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet. 1999; 354:1248–1252. PMID: 10520633.
Article
2. Verhaak PF, Kerssens JJ, Dekker J, Sorbi MJ, Bensing JM. Prevalence of chronic benign pain disorder among adults: a review of the literature. Pain. 1998; 77:231–239. PMID: 9808348.
Article
3. Litcher-Kelly L, Martino SA, Broderick JE, Stone AA. A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic musculoskeletal pain in clinical and randomized controlled clinical trials. J Pain. 2007; 8:906–913. PMID: 17690014.
Article
4. Gatchel RJ. Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: the biopsychosocial perspective. Am Psychol. 2004; 59:795–805. PMID: 15554853.
Article
5. McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988; 18:1007–1019. PMID: 3078045.
Article
6. Melzack R, Katz J. Pain measurement in persons in pain. In : Wall PD, Melzack R, editors. Textbook of pain. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingston;1999. p. 129–164.
7. Melzack R. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987; 30:191–197. PMID: 3670870.
Article
8. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990; 13:227–236. PMID: 2197679.
Article
9. Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79:231–252. PMID: 10352653.
Article
10. Kato J. PainVision. Masui. 2011; 60:1059–1063. PMID: 21950038.
11. Fukada T, Iwakiri H, Ozaki M. A randomised double-blind crossover trial of the potential analgesic effect of a transdermal nicotine patch in non-smokers based on objective and subjective assessment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011; 28:592–596. PMID: 21681103.
Article
12. Kanai A, Horie T, Okamoto H. Change of the affected skin temperature in the sub-acute stage predicts the pain intensity and disability in patients with post-herpetic neuralgia. In : Proceedings of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 2012 Annual Meeting; 2012 Oct 13-17; Washington, DC.
13. Maekawa N, Morimoto M, Morimoto M, Uchida T, Umeda T, Koga Y. Can we revaluate pain with PainVision, a device for quantitative analysis of perception and pain? A feasibility study of pain in herpes zoster patients. J Jpn Soc Clin Anesth. 2009; 29:824–828.
14. Collins WR Jr, Nulsen FE, Randt CT. Relation of peripheral nerve fiber size and sensation in man. Arch Neurol. 1960; 3:381–385. PMID: 13694775.
Article
15. Lerner TH, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. Quantitative sensory nerve conduction threshold (sNCT) evaluation of the trigeminal nerve at the mental foramen area. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84:103–107. PMID: 10898847.
Article
16. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986; 27:117–126. PMID: 3785962.
Article
17. Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001; 93:173–183. PMID: 11427329.
18. Ho K, Spence J, Murphy MF. Review of pain-measurement tools. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27:427–432. PMID: 8604852.
Article
19. Melzack R. The McGill pain questionnaire: from description to measurement. Anesthesiology. 2005; 103:199–202. PMID: 15983473.
20. Gracely RH. Evaluation of multi-dimensional pain scales. Pain. 1992; 48:297–300. PMID: 1594252.
Article
21. Matsumura H, Imai R, Gondo M, Watanabe K. Evaluation of pain intensity measurement during the removal of wound dressing material using 'the PainVision™ system' for quantitative analysis of perception and pain sensation in healthy subjects. Int Wound J. 2012; 9:451–455. PMID: 22264336.
Article
22. Bonica JJ, Loeser JD, Chapman CR, Fordyce WE, Domenowske M. The management of pain. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger;1990.
23. Herr KA, Mobily PR. Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly. Appl Nurs Res. 1993; 6:39–46. PMID: 8439177.
Article
24. Linton SJ, Gotestam KG. A clinical comparison of two pain scales: correlation, remembering chronic pain, and a measure of compliance. Pain. 1983; 17:57–65. PMID: 6226918.
Article
25. Turk DC, Rudy TE, Sorkin BA. Neglected topics in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: determination of success. Pain. 1993; 53:3–16. PMID: 8316386.
Article
26. Jensen MP, Karoly P, O'Riordan EF, Bland F Jr, Burns RS. The subjective experience of acute pain. An assessment of the utility of 10 indices. Clin J Pain. 1989; 5:153–159. PMID: 2520397.
Article
27. Holroyd KA, Holm JE, Keefe FJ, Turner JA, Bradley LA, Murphy WD, et al. A multi-center evaluation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire: results from more than 1700 chronic pain patients. Pain. 1992; 48:301–311. PMID: 1534399.
Article
28. Lowe NK, Walker SN, MacCallum RC. Confirming the theoretical structure of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in acute clinical pain. Pain. 1991; 46:53–60. PMID: 1896208.
Article
29. Boureau F, Luu M, Doubrere JF. Comparative study of the validity of four French McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) versions. Pain. 1992; 50:59–65. PMID: 1513604.
Article
30. Strand LI, Wisnes AR. The development of a Norwegian pain questionnaire. Pain. 1991; 46:61–66. PMID: 1896209.
Article
31. Debono DJ, Hoeksema LJ, Hobbs RD. Caring for patients with chronic pain: pearls and pitfalls. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013; 113:620–627. PMID: 23918913.
Article
32. Rozenberg S. Chronic low back pain: definition and treatment. Rev Prat. 2008; 58:265–272. PMID: 18536200.
33. Patel AT, Ogle AA. Diagnosis and management of acute low back pain. Am Fam Physician. 2000; 61:1779–1786. 1789–1790. PMID: 10750882.
34. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; National Institutes of Health. Low back pain fact sheet for patients and the public. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2004; 18:95–110.
35. Stojanovic M. Quantitative sensory testing in pain states. Curr Rev Pain. 1998; 2:201–205.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr