Korean J Med.  1997 Aug;53(2):225-231.

The Role of Conventional Methods for Diagnosis and Preoperative Staging of Gastric Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer remains the main cause of cancer-related death in Korea. Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer is essential to predict prognosis and to plan optimal treatment. Although there are many reports dealing with the diagnostic values of conventional methods, controversies are still present especially in the field of preoperative staging. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of gastroscopy and upper gastrointestinal series(UGI) for diagnosis of gastric cancer, and determined the usefulness of ultrasonography and computed tomography for preoperative staging.
METHODS
One hundred twenty-three patients, who underwent operation from Aug. 1991 to Mar. 1995 under the diagnosis of gastric cancer were analyzed. We excluded 15 patients because their postoperative definitive stagings were undetemined.
RESULTS
1) Among 123 patients, the proportion of early gastric cancer was 26.0%(32/123) and that of the advanced gastric cancer was 74.0%(91/123). 2) The sensitivity of endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer was 96.7%(119/123), and the accuracy to determine the depth of invasion was 82.9% (102/123). 3) The sensitivity of UGI study for gastric cancer was 89.9%(98/109), and the accuracy to determine the depth of invasion was 61.5%(61/109). 4) The sensitivity of abdominal ultrasonography to detect the tumor was 11.3%(8/71), the accuracy to determine the T stage was 29.2%(28/96), and the sensitivity and specificity to detect lymph node metastasis was 13.6%(8/59), 100%(37/37), respectively. 5) The sensitivity of abdominal CT to detect the tumor was 74.3%(26/35), the accuracy to determine the T stage was 32.5%(13/40), and the sensitivity and specificity to detect lymph node metastasis were 34.5%(9/29), 72.7%(8/11), respectively. 6) The accuracy of preoperative staging was 45.5%(56/123). The 49.6%(62/123) of gastric cancer was downstaged, whereas only 4.1%(5/123) was overstaged.
CONCLUSION
Our results show that high accuracy for diagnosis of gastrie cancer with the gastroscopy and UGI. However preoperative staging with ultrasonography and computed tomograpy was often underestimated, which could be concluded that the usefulness of the radiologic methods was limited.

Keyword

Gastric cancer; Diagnosis; Staging

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis*
Gastroscopy
Humans
Korea
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Prognosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Stomach Neoplasms*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Ultrasonography
Full Text Links
  • KJM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr