J Gynecol Oncol.  2012 Jul;23(3):168-174. 10.3802/jgo.2012.23.3.168.

Salvage radiotherapy for lymph node recurrence after radical surgery in cervical cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khjae@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
This study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of patients treated with salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of isolated lymph node recurrence of cervical cancer.
METHODS
Between 1990 and 2009, 22 cervical cancer patients with lymph node recurrence who had previously undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were treated with salvage radiotherapy with (n=18) or without (n=4) chemotherapy. Of the 22 patients, 10 had supraclavicular lymph node recurrence, 9 had para-aortic lymph node, and 3 had inguinal lymph node. The median total radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy (range, 40 to 70 Gy). Initial pathologic findings, latent period to lymph node recurrence and other clinical parameters such as squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) level and concurrent chemotherapy were identified as prognostic factors for survival.
RESULTS
The median follow-up period after salvage radiotherapy was 31.2 months (range, 12.1 to 148.9 months). The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates of all patients were 32.7% and 30.7%, respectively. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (p=0.009) and longer latent period to lymph node recurrence (>18 months vs. < or =18 months, p=0.019) were significant predictors of progression-free survival and SCC-Ag level at the time of recurrence (>8 ng/dL vs. < or =8 ng/dL, p=0.008) and longer latent period to lymph node recurrence (p=0.040) for overall survival. Treatment failure after salvage radiotherapy occurred in 14 (63.6%) for the 22 patients (in field, 2; out of field, 10; both in and out field, 2). Grade 3 acute skin (n=2) and hematologic toxicity (n=1) developed in 3 patients.
CONCLUSION
For isolated lymph node recurrence of cervical cancer, salvage radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy should be considered, especially in patients with a long-term progression-free period.

Keyword

Cervical cancer; Lymph nodes; Salvage therapy

MeSH Terms

Antigens, Neoplasm
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Chemoradiotherapy
Disease-Free Survival
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hysterectomy
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Recurrence
Salvage Therapy
Serpins
Skin
Survival Rate
Treatment Failure
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Antigens, Neoplasm
Serpins

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Progression-free and overall survival of no evidence of disease (NED) >18 months and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) group.


Reference

1. Brady LW, Perez CA, Bedwinek JM. Failure patterns in gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986. 12:549–557.
2. Fagundes H, Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Lockett MA. Distant metastases after irradiation alone in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992. 24:197–204.
3. Kim JH, Kim HJ, Hong S, Wu HG, Ha SW. Post-hysterectomy radiotherapy in FIGO stage IB-IIB uterine cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005. 96:407–414.
4. Rotman M, Pajak TF, Choi K, Clery M, Marcial V, Grigsby PW, et al. Prophylactic extended-field irradiation of para-aortic lymph nodes in stages IIB and bulky IB and IIA cervical carcinomas: ten-year treatment results of RTOG 79-20. JAMA. 1995. 274:387–393.
5. Sakurai H, Mitsuhashi N, Takahashi M, Akimoto T, Muramatsu H, Ishikawa H, et al. Analysis of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiation therapy alone: patterns of recurrence, latent periods, and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001. 50:1136–1144.
6. Niibe Y, Kazumoto T, Toita T, Yamazaki H, Higuchi K, Ii N, et al. Frequency and characteristics of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma in Japan: a multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol. 2006. 103:435–438.
7. Carlson V, Delclos L, Fletcher GH. Distant metastases in squamous-cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Radiology. 1967. 88:961–966.
8. Stock RG, Chen AS, Flickinger JC, Kalnicki S, Seski J. Node-positive cervical cancer: impact of pelvic irradiation and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995. 31:31–36.
9. Huang EY, Wang CJ, Chen HC, Fang FM, Huang YJ, Wang CY, et al. Multivariate analysis of para-aortic lymph node recurrence after definitive radiotherapy for stage IB-IVA squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008. 72:834–842.
10. Higginson DS, Morris DE, Jones EL, Clarke-Pearson D, Varia MA. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): technological innovation and application in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011. 120:404–412.
11. Green JA, Kirwan JM, Tierney JF, Symonds P, Fresco L, Collingwood M, et al. Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2001. 358:781–786.
12. Singh AK, Grigsby PW, Rader JS, Mutch DG, Powell MA. Cervix carcinoma, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and salvage of isolated paraaortic lymph node recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005. 61:450–455.
13. Chou HH, Wang CC, Lai CH, Hong JH, Ng KK, Chang TC, et al. Isolated paraaortic lymph node recurrence after definitive irradiation for cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001. 51:442–448.
14. Choi CW, Cho CK, Yoo SY, Kim MS, Yang KM, Yoo HJ, et al. Image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastases from uterine cervical and corpus cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009. 74:147–153.
15. Bolli JA, Doering DL, Bosscher JR, Day TG Jr, Rao CV, Owens K, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen: clinical utility in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1994. 55:169–173.
16. Rose PG, Baker S, Fournier L, Nelson BE, Hunter RE. Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in invasive cervical cancer: prediction of response and recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993. 168:942–946.
17. Kim JS, Kim JS, Kim SY, Kim KH, Cho MJ. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy for para-aortic lymph node recurrence in carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003. 55:1247–1253.
18. Ho KC, Wang CC, Qiu JT, Lai CH, Hong JH, Huang YT, et al. Identification of prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer and supraclavicular lymph node recurrence. Gynecol Oncol. 2011. 123:253–256.
19. Grigsby PW, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F. Lymph node staging by positron emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2001. 19:3745–3749.
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr