Korean J Anesthesiol.  2016 Apr;69(2):133-137. 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.133.

Comparison of the GlideScope and the McGrath method using vascular forceps and a tube exchanger in cases of simulated difficult airway intubation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea. chosy@hanyang.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
A "difficult airway" can be simulated with an extrication collar, which restricts cervical motion and mouth opening. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of the GlideScope and the McGrath in difficult airway simulation.
METHODS
Patients were randomized using computer-generated numbers and were placed into the GlideScope group or the McGrath group. The total intubation time was defined as the time measured from when the anesthesiologist picks up the device to the time at which three successive end-tidal CO2 values are acquired after intubation.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in total intubation time between the two groups (73.0 ± 25.3 sec vs. 72.3 ± 20.9 sec, P = 0.92). The success rates of the first intubation attempt did not differ between the two groups (82.8% vs. 83.3%, P = 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that there are no significant differences in the intubations with GlideScope and McGrath using vascular forceps and tube exchangers in difficult intubation scenarios.

Keyword

Airway management; Intratracheal intubation; Laryngoscopes

MeSH Terms

Airway Management
Humans
Intubation*
Intubation, Intratracheal
Laryngoscopes
Mouth
Surgical Instruments*

Cited by  2 articles

Survival analysis: Part I — analysis of time-to-event
Junyong In, Dong Kyu Lee
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(3):182-191.    doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00067.

A good laryngeal view does not guarantee perfectly successful tracheal intubation
Sung Mi Hwang
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69(2):111-112.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.2.111.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr