Korean J Lab Med.  2006 Oct;26(5):317-322. 10.3343/kjlm.2006.26.5.317.

Comparison of the Rate of Detection of Immunoglobulin Heavy Chain Gene Rearrangement by Fluoresecence In Situ Hybridization Probes in Multiple Myeloma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. soonlee@plaza.snu.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene rearrangement, which is frequently observed in multiple myeloma, can now be detected easily by using a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method. The aim of this study was to determine the detection rate and compare the utility of the three most commonly used probes: IGH/CCND1 dual color, dual fusion probe; IGH/BCL2 dual color, dual fusion probe; and IGH dual color break apart rearrangement probe; all from Vysis Products (Downers Grove, IL, USA).
METHODS
From October 1994 to July 2003, 99 patients were diagnosed as multiple myeloma at Seoul National University Hospital, Asan Medical Center and Gachon University Gil hospital. We applied the three different probes of IgH FISH on bone marrow specimens from the 99 Korean patients with multiple myeloma to detect IgH gene rearrangement.
RESULTS
Forty-one (41.4%) of the 99 patients had IgH gene rearrangement. Of those 41 patients, 23 (56.1%) showed positive to all three probes, but the remaining 18 (43.9%) showed a discrepancy between the three probes: 13 (72.2%) of the 18 patients were only positive to the IGH dual color break apart rearrangement probe and the detection rate was 39.6% on the average.
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate that IGH dual color break apart rearrangement probe is superior to the other two probes in qualitative and quantitative ways. Thus, we recommend IGH dual color break apart rearrangement probe for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma.

Keyword

Immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement; FISH; Multiple myeloma

MeSH Terms

Bone Marrow
Chungcheongnam-do
Diagnosis
Fluorescence
Gene Rearrangement*
Humans
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains*
Immunoglobulins*
In Situ Hybridization*
Multiple Myeloma*
Seoul
Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains
Immunoglobulins

Reference

References

1. Bakkus MH, Heirman C, Van Riet I, Van Camp B, Thielemans K. Evidence that multiple myeloma Ig heavy chain VDJ genes contain somatic mutations but show no intraclonal variation. Blood. 1992; 80:2326–35.
Article
2. Dewald G, Kyle RA, Hicks GA, Greipp PR. The clinical significance of cytogenetic studies in 100 patients with multiple myeloma, plasma cell leukemia, or amyloidosis. Blood. 1985; 66:380–90.
Article
3. Ranni NS, Slavutsky I, Wechsler A, Brieux de Salum S. Chromosome findings in multiple myeloma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1987; 25:309–16.
Article
4. Gould J, Alexanian R, Goodacre A, Pathak S, Hecht B, Barlogie B. Plasma cell karyotype in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1988; 71:453–6.
Article
5. Offit K, Parsa NZ, Filippa D, Jhanwar SC, Chaganti RS. t(9;14)(p13;q32) denotes a subset of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with plasmacytoid differentiation. Blood. 1992; 80:2594–9.
Article
6. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Clearly ML, et al. A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood. 1994; 84:1361–92.
7. Chesi M, Nardini E, Lim RS, Smith KD, Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL. The t(4;14) translocation in myeloma dysregulates both FGFR3 and a novel gene, MMSET, resulting in IgH/MMSET hybrid transcripts. Blood. 1998; 92:3025–34.
8. Sibley K, Fenton JA, Drring AM, Ashcroft AJ, Rawstron AC, Morgan GJ. A molecular study of the t(4;14) in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2002; 118:514–20.
Article
9. Nishida K, Tamura A, Nakazawa N, Ueda Y, Abe T, Matsuda F, et al. The Ig heavy chain gene is frequently involved in chromosomal translocations in multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia as detected by in situ hybridization. Blood. 1997; 90:526–34.
Article
10. Szczepek AJ, Bergsagel PL, Axelsson L, Brown CB, Belch AR, Pilarski LM. CD34+ cells in the blood of patients with multiple myeloma express CD19 and IgH mRNA and have patient-specific IgH VDJ gene rearrangements. Blood. 1997; 89:1824–33.
Article
11. Huh JW, Ahn JY, Lee JH, Im SA, Seong CM, Chung WS. Detection of IgH and Cyclin D1 gene rearrangement with interphase FISH in multiple myeloma. Korean J Lab Med. 2002; 22:367–71.
12. Billadeau D, Ahmann G, Greipp P, Van Ness B. The bone marrow of multiple myeloma patients contains B cell populations at different stages of differentiation that are clonally related to the malignant plasma cell. J Exp Med. 1993; 178:1023–31.
Article
13. Chesi M, Nardini E, Brents LA, Schrock E, Ried T, Kuehl WM, et al. Frequent translocation t(4;14)(p16.3;q32.3) in multiple myeloma is associated with increased expression and activating mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Nat Genet. 1997; 16:260–4.
Article
14. Rose NR, Hamiltion RG, editors. Manual of clinical laboratory immunology. 6th ed.Washington: ASM press;2002. 54–65.
15. Iida S, Rao PH, Butler M, Corradini P, Baccadoro M, Klein B, et al. Deregulation of MUM1/IRF4 by chromosomal translocation in multiple myeloma. Nat Genet. 1997; 17:226–30.
Article
16. Shaughnessy J Jr, Gabrea A, Qi Y, Brents L, Zhan F, Tian E, et al. Cyclin D3 at6p21 is dysregulated by recurrent chromosomal translocations to immunoglobulin loci in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2001; 98:217–23.
17. Sawyer JR, Waldron JA, Jagannath S, Barlogie B. Cytogenetic findings in 200 patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1995; 82:41–9.
Article
18. Fonseca R, Bailey RJ, Ahmann GJ, Rajkumar SV, Hoyer JD, Lust JA, et al. Genomic abnormalities in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2002; 100:1417–24.
Article
19. Nishida K, Tamura A, Nakazawa N, Ueda Y, Abe T, Matsuda F, et al. The Ig heavy chain gene is frequently involved in chromosomal translocations in multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia as detected by in situ hybridization. Blood. 1997; 90:526–34.
Article
20. Phillip P, Drivsholm A, Hansen NE, Jensen MK, Killmann SA. Chromosomes and survival in multiple myeloma. A banding study of 25 cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1980; 2:243–57.
21. Moreau P, Facon T, Leleu X, Morineau N, Huyghe P, Harousseau JL, et al. Recurrent 14q32 translocations determine the prognosis of multiple myeloma, especially in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy. Blood. 2002; 100:1579–83.
Article
22. Reiman T, Seeberger K, Taylor BJ, Szczepek AJ, Hanson J, Mant MJ, et al. Persistent preswitch clonotypic myeloma cells correlate with decreased survival: evidence for isotype switching within the myeloma clone. Blood. 2001; 98:2791–9.
Article
23. Keats JJ, Reiman T, Maxwell CA, Taylor BJ, Larratt LM, Mant MJ, et al. In multiple myeloma, t(4;14)(p16;q32) is an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of FGFR3 expression. Blood. 2003; 101:1520–9.
Article
24. Hallek M, Bergsagel PL, Anderson KC. Multiple myeloma: increasing evidence for a multistep transformation process. Blood. 1998; 91:3–21.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJLM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr