Korean Circ J.  2013 Sep;43(9):615-621. 10.4070/kcj.2013.43.9.615.

Utility of Global Strain by Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Speckle Tracking for Assessing Left Ventricular Diastolic Function: Comparison with Pressure Wire Analysis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea. sshin@inha.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
We evaluated the utility of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) left ventricular (LV) global myocardial deformity parameters for assessing LV diastolic function by comparing invasive measures of LV performance.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Echocardiography and LV pressure were assessed in 39 patients. Myocardial LV longitudinal, circumferential, and radial deformations, as well as area strain, were evaluated utilizing 2D and 3D speckle tracking software. The 2D early diastolic strain rate (2D-SRe) was measured from the 3 apical and 3 short axis views. The 3D diastolic index (3D-DI) was calculated by the % change of global strain during the first one-third of the diastolic period. LV end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and the rate of LV pressure change (dP/dt) were collected using a pressure-conducted catheter and tau was calculated.
RESULTS
dP/dt(min) were related to early mitral annular velocity (e'), 2D-SRe(long), 2D-SRe(radial), as well as 3D-DI(long), and 3D-DI(as). Additionally, LVEDP was associated with the ratio of mitral early diastolic velocity (E) to 2D-SRe(long), 2D-SRe(circ), 2D-SRe(radial), 3D-DI(long), 3D-DI(circ), and 3D-DI(as). E/2D-SRe(long), E/2D-SRe(radial), E/3D-DI(long), and E/3D-DI(as) were comparable with E/e' in predicting patients with elevated LVEDP. Among those patients with E/e' of 8 to 15, E/3D-DI(long) provided incremental value in identifying those with LVEDP > or =15 mm Hg.
CONCLUSION
2D-SRe(long), 2D-SRe(radial), 3D-DI(long), and 3D-DI(as) were related to LV relaxation, and the ratios of E to those parameters were associated with LVEDP. In addition, among patients with indeterminate E/e', E/3D-DI(long) offered incremental value in predicting elevated LVEDP, suggesting it may provide supplementary information in the evaluation of LV diastolic function.

Keyword

Diastole; Echocardiography; Ventricular pressure

MeSH Terms

Axis, Cervical Vertebra
Blood Pressure
Catheters
Congenital Abnormalities
Diastole
Echocardiography
Humans
Relaxation
Sprains and Strains
Track and Field
Ventricular Pressure

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Correlations between the echocardiographic parameters and the minimal rate of left ventricular filling.

  • Fig. 2 Correlations between the ratio of E to various echocardiographic measures and left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

  • Fig. 3 Receiver operating characteristics curves of the ratio of E to various echo measures in identifying patients with left ventricular end diastolic pressure ≥15 mm Hg.

  • Fig. 4 Receiver operating characteristics curves of the ratio of E to various echo measures in identifying patients with left ventricular end diastolic pressure ≥15 mm Hg among those patients with E/Em 8 to 15.


Reference

1. Moller JE, Hillis GS, Oh JK, et al. Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107:2207–2212.
2. Pritchett AM, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ, Karon BL, Redfield MM. Diastolic dysfunction and left atrial volume: a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45:87–92.
3. Anavekar NS, Mirza A, Skali H, et al. Risk assessment in patients with depressed left ventricular function after myocardial infarction using the myocardial performance index--Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) experience. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006; 19:28–33.
4. Meta-Analysis Research Group in Echocardiography (MeRGE) AMI Collaborators. Møller JE, Whalley GA, et al. Independent prognostic importance of a restrictive left ventricular filling pattern after myocardial infarction: an individual patient meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis Research Group in Echocardiography acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008; 117:2591–2598.
5. Sohn DW, Chai IH, Lee DJ, et al. Assessment of mitral annulus velocity by Doppler tissue imaging in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30:474–480.
6. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22:107–133.
7. Marwick TH. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47:1313–1327.
8. Oh JK, Park SJ, Nagueh SF. Established and novel clinical applications of diastolic function assessment by echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 4:444–455.
9. Ishii K, Suyama T, Imai M, et al. Abnormal regional left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: clinical significance of post-ischemic diastolic stunning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54:1589–1597.
10. Owan TE, Hodge DO, Herges RM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL, Redfield MM. Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:251–259.
11. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, et al. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355:260–269.
12. Penicka M, Bartunek J, Trakalova H, et al. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in outpatients with unexplained dyspnea: a pressure-volume loop analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55:1701–1710.
13. Hillis GS, Møller JE, Pellikka PA, et al. Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e' is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43:360–367.
14. Stevenson LW, Tillisch JH, Hamilton M, et al. Importance of hemodynamic response to therapy in predicting survival with ejection fraction less than or equal to 20% secondary to ischemic or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1990; 66:1348–1354.
15. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation. 2000; 102:1788–1794.
16. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quiñones MA. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30:1527–1533.
17. Park TH, Nagueh SF, Khoury DS, et al. Impact of myocardial structure and function postinfarction on diastolic strain measurements: implications for assessment of myocardial viability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 290:H724–H731.
18. Pislaru C, Bruce CJ, Anagnostopoulos PC, et al. Ultrasound strain imaging of altered myocardial stiffness: stunned versus infarcted reperfused myocardium. Circulation. 2004; 109:2905–2910.
19. Wang J, Khoury DS, Thohan V, Torre-Amione G, Nagueh SF. Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressures. Circulation. 2007; 115:1376–1383.
20. Seo Y, Ishizu T, Enomoto Y, et al. Validation of 3-dimensional speckle tracking imaging to quantify regional myocardial deformation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2:451–459.
21. Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24:277–313.
22. Urbano-Moral JA, Patel AR, Maron MS, Arias-Godinez JA, Pandian NG. Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: methodological aspects and clinical potential. Echocardiography. 2012; 29:997–1010.
23. Urbano-Moral JA, Arias-Godinez JA, Ahmad R, et al. Evaluation of myocardial mechanics with three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant recipients: comparison with two-dimensional speckle tracking and relationship with clinical variables. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; [Epub ahead of print].
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr