J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2013 Nov;54(11):1669-1674. 10.3341/jkos.2013.54.11.1669.

The Analysis of Vault Change after Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens Size Exchange

Affiliations
  • 1B&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, Korea. kimjinkuk@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the vault change after implantable collamer lens (ICL) size exchange according to the preoperative vault.
METHODS
In 14 eyes of 13 patients, the vault change after ICL exchange operation due to unideal vault was compared in 2 groups, the smaller ICL exchanged group and larger ICL exchanged group.
RESULTS
In 6 out of 14 eyes, the ICL was exchanged to a 0.5 mm smaller size and the vault was changed from 1.38 mm (1.18-1.70) to 0.71 mm (0.51-0.92) (p = 0.03). In 8 eyes, the ICL was exchanged to a 0.5 mm bigger size and the vault was changed from 0.07 mm (0.03-0.13) to 0.50 mm (0.12-1.01) (p < 0.01). The exchange operation was performed at 3.5 postoperative days (1-6) if the ICL was exchanged to 1 step smaller size, but the exchange operation was performed at 135 postoperative days (90-660) if the ICL was exchanged to 1 step bigger size (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
ICL exchange to 1 step smaller or bigger size is an effective method to correct unideal postoperative vault to a more ideal vault size. The exchange to 1 step smaller size ICL tended to be performed sooner.

Keyword

Exchange; Implantable collamer lens; Phakic intraocular lens; Vault

MeSH Terms

Humans
Phakic Intraocular Lenses*

Reference

References

1. Han SY, Lee KH. Long term effect of ICL implantation to treat high myopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:465–72.
2. DU GP, Huang YF, Wang LQ, et al. Outcome after treatment of myopia with implantable Collamer lens. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2011; 47:146–50.
3. Portaliou DM, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, et al. Long-term results of phakic refractive lens implantation in eyes with high myopia. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27:787–91.
Article
4. Alfonso JF, Baamonde B, Fernández-Vega L, et al. Posterior cham- ber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lenses to correct my- opia: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:873–80.
5. Yokoyama S, Kojima T, Horai R, et al. Repeatability of the ciliary sulcus-to-sulcus diameter measurement using wide-scanning-field ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1251–6.
Article
6. Seo JH, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH. Effects of white-to-white di- ameter and anterior chamber depth on implantable collamer lens vault and visual outcome. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:730–8.
7. Lee DH, Choi SH, Chung ES. Chung TY Correlation between preoperative biometry and posterior chamber phakic Visian Implantable Collamer Lens vaulting. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:272–7.
8. Choi KH, Chung SE, Chung TY, Chung ES. Ultrasound biomicro- scopy for determining visian implantable contact lens length in phakic IOL implantation. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:362–7.
9. Reinstein DZ, Lovisolo CF, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Comparison of postoperative vault height predictability using white-to-white or sulcus diameter-based sizing for the visian implantable collamer lens. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:30–5.
Article
10. Kojima T, Yokoyama S, Ito M, et al. Optimization of an implant- able collamer lens sizing method using high-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 153:632–7. e1.
11. Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Lisa C, et al. Central vault after phakic intraocular lens implantation: correlation with anterior chamber depth, white-to-white distance, spherical equivalent, and patient age. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:46–53.
Article
12. Kim WK, Yang H, Cho EY, et al. The effect of lens thickness to an- terior chamber depth on the vault after ICL implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1081–7.
13. Kwak AY, Ryu IH, Kim JK, et al. Effect of preoperative crystalline lens rise on vaulting after implantable collamer lens implantation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2012; 53:1749–55.
Article
14. Kojima T, Maeda M, Yoshida Y, et al. Posterior chamber phakic implantable collamer lens: changes in vault during 1 year. J Refract Surg. 2010; 26:327–32.
Article
15. Alfonso JF, Lisa C, Abdelhamid A, et al. Three-year follow-up of subjective vault following myopic implantable collamer lens implantation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 248:1827–35.
Article
16. Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Lisa C, et al. Long-term evaluation of the central vault after phakic Collamer® lens (ICL) implantation using OCT. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 250:1807–12.
Article
17. Du GP, Huang YF, Wang LQ, et al. Changes in objective vault and effect on vision outcomes after implantable Collamer lens im- plantation: 1-year follow-up. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011; 22:153–60.
18. Bechmann M, Ullrich S, Thiel MJ, et al. Imaging of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens by optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:360–3.
Article
19. Fernandes P, González-Méijome JM, Madrid-Costa D, et al. Implantable collamer posterior chamber intraocular lenses: a re- view of potential complications. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27:765–76.
20. Gonvers M, Othenin-Girard P, Bornet C, Sickenberg M. Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: short-term follow-up of 2 models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:380–8.
21. Sanders DR, Vukich JA. ICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group. Incidence of lens opacities and clinically significant cata- racts with the implantable contact lens: comparison of two lens designs. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:673–82.
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr