J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2015 Aug;56(8):1256-1262. 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.8.1256.

Analysis of Clinical Changes in Pediatric Low Vision Patients

• Kim WS
• Moon NJ

• KMID: 2215079
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2015.56.8.1256

Abstract

PURPOSE
To analyze the clinical changes in pediatric low-vision patients under 15 years of age.
METHODS
We compared pediatric low-vision patients under 15 years of age with subjects from 1995 to 2000 (past group, subjects from our previous study) and from 2004 to 2014 (present group). A retrospective chart review was performed of 109 patients from the present group, including epidemiological characteristics and prescribed aids.
RESULTS
The mean age in the present group was 8.6 years and decreased by 1.1 years compared with the past group. The percentage of pediatric patients under 15 years of age increased from 31.9% to 36.1%; however, there was no statistical significance (p = 0.241). The treatable or preventable diseases including congenital cataract and glaucoma decreased significantly from 23.4% to 11.9% (p = 0.021). The percentage of 0.1 or better in near and distant visual acuity increased significantly from 60.5% and 54.0% to 85.4% and 67.9%, respectively (p = 0.027 and p < 0.001, respectively). The number of subjects prescribed 2 or more low vision aids and new portable electronic magnifying devices was significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Recent changes including decreased mean age, reduced treatable or preventable diseases, and increased percentage of pediatric patients might correlate to social services. Early detection is important for rehabilitation and quality of life in low vision patients, thus promotion and expansion of social services is necessary. In addition, because the proportion of novel low vision aids has increased, ophthalmologists should stay current on technology improvements.

Keyword

Clinical changes; Pediatric low vision

MeSH Terms

Cataract
Glaucoma
Humans
Quality of Life
Rehabilitation
Retrospective Studies
Social Work
Vision, Low*
Visual Acuity

Figure

• 

  Figure 1. Electronic magnifying device (mouse type).

Reference

References

1. World Health Organization. Developing an action plan to prevent blindness at national, provincial and district levels. 2nd. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Agency for the prevention of blindness;2004. p. 43–4.

2. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96:614–8.

3. Chiang PP, Marella M, Ormsby G, Keeffe J. Critical issues in im-plementing low vision care in the Asia-Pacific region. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012; 60:456–9.

4. Park JH. The relationships between low vision and socioeconomic status in Korean adults. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2011; 16:319–25.

5. Bodeau-Livinec F, Surman G, Kaminski M. . Recent trends in visual impairment and blindness in the UK. Arch Dis Child. 2007; 92:1099–104.

6. Lee HI, Song KS, Moon NJ. Clinical Analysis of 350 low vision patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000; 41:2391–400.

7. Kim YD, Park SC, Kim DH. Epidemiological analysis and study of social welfare of low vision patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:111–6.

8. Keen DV. Helping the young visually impaired: a view from the community. Arch Dis Child. 1993; 69:467–9.

9. Park MG, Moon NJ. Analysis of 137 pediatric low vision patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2001; 42:1194–201.

10. Aghaji A, Okoye O, Bowman R. Causes and emerging trends of childhood blindness: findings from schools for the blind in Southeast Nigeria. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99:727–31.

11. Patel DK, Tajunisah I, Gilbert C, Subrayan V. Childhood blindness and severe visual impairment in Malaysia: a nationwide study. Eye (Lond). 2011; 25:436–42.

12. Sarvananthan N, Surendran M, Roberts EO. . The prevalence of nystagmus: the Leicestershire nystagmus survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:5201–6.

13. Haji SA, Sambhav K, Grover S, Chalam KV. Evaluation of the iPad as a low vision aid for improving reading ability. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 9:17–20.

14. Hakobyan L, Lumsden J, O'Sullivan D, Bartlett H. Mobile assis-tive technologies for the visually impaired. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013; 58:513–28.

15. Chadha RK, Subramanian A. The effect of visual impairment on quality of life of children aged 3-16 years. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:642–5.

16. Gyawali R, Paudel N, Adhikari P. Quality of life in Nepalese pa-tients with low vision and the impact of low vision services. J Optom. 2012; 5:188–95.

17. Oh DH, Park SH, Lee JK, Moon NJ. Clinical findings and results of low vision devices in pediatric patients with albinism. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:466–71.

18. Çalik BB, Kitiş A, Cavlak U, Oğ uzhanoğ lu A. The impact of atten-tion training on children with low vision: a randomized trial. Turk J Med Sci. 2012; 42:(Suppl 1). 1186–93.