J Korean Med Assoc.  2014 May;57(5):444-454. 10.5124/jkma.2014.57.5.444.

The current status and development of a skill examination for the Korean speciality certification examination

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. fmjjcho@naver.com
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Uijongbu, Korea.
  • 4Department of Dermatology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Pediatrics, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.

Abstract

The Specialty Certification Examination is an important part of the assessment of medical education. However, the step 2 skill examinations of 26 medical specialties in Korea are insufficient with respect to achieving the objective of practical examinations that evaluate clinical skill and competence. Among the current step 2 skill examination methods, picture testing using slides or reading of pathology slides/radiologic images is more suitable for testing cognition and knowledge than for testing performance. The oral examination has low reliability because of its relatively short testing period and absence of scoring criteria. In addition, the Specialty Certification Examination is a high-stakes test and the performance during the training course is not reflected in the skill examination. We have reviewed the various skill examinations including clinical practice examinations, objective structured clinical examinations of the United States and Canada, and work-based assessments of the United Kingdom. Based on the review, we suggest some plans for improving the Korean Specialty Certification Examination.

Keyword

Specialty Certification Examination; Performance assessment; Skill examination; Work based assessments

MeSH Terms

Canada
Certification*
Clinical Competence
Cognition
Diagnosis, Oral
Education, Medical
Great Britain
Korea
Mental Competency
Pathology
United States

Figure

  • Figure 1 The examination methods and Miller's pyramid of competence. OSCE, objective structured clinical examination; CCS, computerized case simulation; MCQ, multiple choice questions.

  • Figure 2 The surgical training pathway. MRCS, Membership of the Royal College of Surgeons; FRCS, Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons. From Evgeniou E, et al. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2013;10:2, according to the Creative Commons license [9].


Reference

1. Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Med Educ. 2002; 36:800–804.
Article
2. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990; 65:9 Suppl. S63–S67.
Article
3. Wass V, Van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet. 2001; 357:945–949.
Article
4. Amin Z, Khoo HE. Basics in medical education. London: World Scientific;2003.
5. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Wass V. Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41:1224–1233.
Article
6. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007; 29:855–871.
Article
7. Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board. Developing and maintaining an assessment system: a PMETB guide to good practice [Internet]. London: The Assessment Working Group;2007. cited 2014 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Assessment_good_practice_v0207.pdf_31385949.pdf.
8. Van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ. 2005; 39:309–317.
Article
9. Evgeniou E, Peter L, Tsironi M, Iyer S. Assessment methods in surgical training in the United Kingdom. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013; 10:2.
Article
10. Mitchell C, Bhat S, Herbert A, Baker P. Workplace-based assessments of junior doctors: do scores predict training difficulties? Med Educ. 2011; 45:1190–1198.
Article
11. Brennan TA, Horwitz RI, Duffy FD, Cassel CK, Goode LD, Lipner RS. The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement. JAMA. 2004; 292:1038–1043.
Article
12. The American Board of Medical Specialties. About board certification [Internet]. Chicago: The American Board of Medical Specialties;2013. cited 2014 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.abms.org/About_Board_Certification/.
13. The American Board of Physician Specialties. ABPS Boards of Certifications [Internet]. Tampa: The American Board of Physician Specialties;2014. cited 2014 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.abpsus.org/abps-medical-board-certifications.
14. The College of Family Physicians of Canada. Certification examination in family medicine [Internet]. Mississauga: The College of Family Physicians of Canada;2014. cited 2014 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.cfpc.ca/FMExam/.
15. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Examination guidelines for registered candidates [Internet]. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada;2013. cited 2014 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/credentials/start/exams/candidate_information.
16. The Royal College of General Practitioners. MRCGP exam overview [Internet]. London: The Royal College of General Practitioners;2014. cited 2014 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/gp-training-and-exams/mrcgp-exam-overview.aspx.
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr