J Korean Med Assoc.  2010 Jan;53(1):67-75. 10.5124/jkma.2010.53.1.67.

Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Eulji University College of Medicine, Korea. soyang@eulji.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Korea.

Abstract

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures suspected at clinical evaluation require radiological confirmation. Most radiologists make the diagnosis of vertebral fracture on the basis of a qualitative impression. However, unlike other fractures, vertebral fractures are commonly found on radiographs obtained for other reasons in patients who do not show signs or symptoms suggestive of fractures. Radiologists qualitatively analyze radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine to identify vertebral fractures in patients whose clinical indications suggest trauma, osteoporosis, malignancy, or acute back pain. The accuracy of decision-making process can be enhanced by additional radiographic projections or by complementary examinations including DXA (Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) morphometry, bone scan, CT, or MRI. The importance of imaging is highlighted by the fact that only about one in four vertebral fractures is recognized on the basis of clinical evaluations without radiographs. Radiographs may include lateral and AP (anterior/posterior) X-rays of the affected spinal segments. The physician may request bone scan and/or CT to help identify the location of the fracture, its status (stable versus unstable). Furthermore, an MRI scan may be performed if neurologic deficit, soft tissue trauma or hematoma are suspected.

Keyword

Osteoporosis; Vertebral fracture; Imaging diagnosis

MeSH Terms

Back Pain
Hematoma
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neurologic Manifestations
Osteoporosis
Osteoporotic Fractures
Spine

Figure

  • Figure 1 Diagram of Saville index (Insurance covered from Grade 3).

  • Figure 2 Various type of vertebral compression fractures: From left, wedge type, biconcave type, and pancake-like crushed vertebral fracture.

  • Figure 3 Semiquantitative method to assess vertebral fractures. (Genant HK, et al. J Bone Mineral Res 1993; 8(9):1137-1148).

  • Figure 4 AP and lateral images of DXA vertebral morphometry.

  • Figure 5 Compression fracture of the 1st lumbar vertebral body by bone scan (left) and sacral insufficiency fracture by bone SPECT (right).

  • Figure 6 CT sagittal reconstructed image and 3 D reformation of L2 vertebral fracture in 62 year-old male.

  • Figure 7 MRI finding of benign vertebral fracture: T2 WI, T1 WI, T1 contrast enhanced image (from left).

  • Figure 8 MRI finding of malignant vertebral fracture: T2 WI, T1 WI, T1 contrast enhanced image (from left). Note the exophytic soft tissue mass and signal changes in the whole spine.

  • Figure 9 MRI finding of sacral insufficiency fracture: Fat suppressed sagittal T2 WI, axial T1 WI, axial fat suppressed T1 WI (from left).

  • Figure 10 Simple radiographs of two cases with multiple myeloma: Heterogenous osteolytic bone loss and biconcave fractures.

  • Figure 11 Simple radiographs of osteomalacia: See the apparent vertebral end-plates with fuzzy appearance.


Cited by  2 articles

Evidence-based management for osteoporosis
Kwan Lee
J Korean Med Assoc. 2011;54(3):294-302.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2011.54.3.294.

Diagnosis of Osteoporosis
Jae Gyoon Kim, Young-Wan Moon
J Korean Hip Soc. 2011;23(2):108-115.    doi: 10.5371/jkhs.2011.23.2.108.


Reference

1. Saville PD. A quantitative approach to simple radiographic diagnosis of osteoporosis: Its application to the osteoporosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1967. 10:416–422.
Article
2. Rogers LF, Lenchik L. Juhl JH, Crummy AB, Kuhlman JE, editors. Metabolic, endocrine, and related bone disease. Essentials of radiologic imaging. 1998. 7th ed. Lippincot-Raven;199–236.
3. Yang SO, Choi MY. Diagnositic imaging features of osteoporosis. Korean J Osteoporosis. 2004. 2:1–8.
4. Cook GJ, Hannaford E, See M, Clarke SE, Fogelman I. The value of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of osteoporotic patients with back pain. Scand J Rheumatol. 2002. 31:245–248.
Article
5. Schousboe JT, DeBold CR, Bowles C, Glickstein S, Rubino RK. Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity by X-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in a population referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2002. 5:239–248.
Article
6. Mayo-Smith W, Rosenthal DI. Radiographic appearance of osteopenia. Radiol Clin North Am. 1991. 29:37–47.
7. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Mineral Res. 1993. 8:1137–1148.
Article
8. Yang SO. Clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Korean J Bone Metab. 1996. 3:128–135.
9. Schousboe JT, Vokes T, Broy SB, Ferrar L, McKiernan F, Roux C, Binkly N. Vertebral fracture assessment: The ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008. 11:92–108.
10. Haller J, André MP, Resnick D, Miller C, Howard BA, Mitchell MJ, Schils JP, Sartoris DJ, Trudell D. Detection of thoracolumbar vertebral body destruction with lateral spine radiography. Part II. Clinical investigation with computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 1990. 25:523–532.
Article
11. Kim JI, Yang SO, Choi JC. MRI findings of vertebral compression fractures. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1995. 33:667–672.
12. Cuénod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, Hamze B, Naouri JF, Chapaux X, Bondeville JM, Tubiana JM. Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology. 1996. 199:541–459.
Article
13. Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S, Duerr HR, Bartl R, Reiser M. Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology. 2002. 225:730–735.
Article
14. Yamato M, Nishimura G, Kuramochi E, Saiki N, Fujioka M. MR appearance at different ages of osteoporotic compression fracture of the vertebrae. Radiat Med. 1998. 16:329–334.
15. Kong JH, Park JS, Ryu KN. Osteoporotic compression fracture of the thoracolumbar spine and sacral insufficiency fracture: incidence and analysis of the relationship according to the clinical factors. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2006. 55:495–500.
Article
16. McAfee JG. Radionuclide imaging in metabolic and systemic skeletal disease. Semin Nucl Med. 1987. 17:334–349.
17. Karchevsky M, Babb JS, Schweitzer ME. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008. 37:791–795.
Article
18. Favus MJ. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. 1996. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven;152–163.
19. Dass B, Puet TA, Watanakunakorn C. Tuberculosis of the spine (Pott's disease) presenting as 'compression fractures'. Spinal Cord. 2002. 40:604–608.
Article
20. Korean Soc of Bone and Mineral Metabolism. Osteoporosis. 2006. Hanmi Publishing Company;134–147.
21. Kalpakcioglu BB, Morshed S, Engelke K, Genant HK. Advanced imaging of bone macrostructure and microstructure in bone fragility and fracture repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. 90:68–78.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr