J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2007 Jun;42(3):366-372. 10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.3.366.

Results of ACL Reconstruction with Autologous Hamstrings Fixed by Two Bioabsorbable Cross Pins on the Femoral Side and a Bioabsorbable Interference Screw with Additional Fixation on the Tibial Side

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, University of Inje College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sibin@amc.seoul.kr
  • 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Dong-guk College of Medicine, Ilsan, Korea.
  • 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, KEPCO Medical Foundation, Hanil General Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons with stable fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventy-six ACL reconstructions using autologous hamstring tendons were reviewed for an average of 16.5 months (Range, 12-35.6 months) postoperatively. All the patients were examined using standard clinical techniques and evaluated by stress radiography, Cybex(TM), Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) ratings.
RESULTS
In all cases, there were no limitations in the range of motion. The mean Lysholm score was 72.9 preoperatively, which later improved to 91.1 postoperatively. According to the IKDC grade, 74 cases were categorized as 'normal' or 'nearly normal' postoperatively. In addition, the CybexTM study showed that at an angular velocity of 60degrees/sec, the strength deficit of the hamstrings decreased to 16% from 24% while the strength deficit of the quadriceps decreased to 27% from 31%. The mean side-to-side difference in stress radiography was 2.4 mm postoperatively. There was a single case of graft failure resulting from a deep infection.
CONCLUSION
ACL reconstructions using autologous hamstrings using stable fixation techniques showed satisfactory results at the 16.5 months follow-up. However, further studies will be needed to confirm these findings over a longer follow-up period.

Keyword

Anterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Hamstrings; Cybex(TM)

MeSH Terms

Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Knee
Radiography
Range of Motion, Articular
Tendons
Transplants

Reference

1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, D'Andria S, Zaccherotti G. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon. Arthroscopy. 1992. 8:510–516.
Article
2. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, D'Andria S, Zaccherotti G. Patellofemoral problems after intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993. 288:195–204.
Article
3. Bin SI, Han YG, Moon HS, Park C. Postoperative results and complications of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. J Korean Knee Soc. 1998. 10:45–49.
4. Bin SI, Kim KY, Cho WS, Moon HS. Cybex evaluation of muscle strength following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1995. 30:262–268.
Article
5. Brown CH Jr, Steiner ME, Carson EW. The use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Technique and results. Clin Sports Med. 1993. 12:723–756.
6. Buss DD, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Galinat BJ, Panariello R. Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. Results after twenty-four to forty-two months. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993. 75:1346–1355.
Article
7. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med. 1999. 27:444–454.
8. Cullison TR, O'Brien TJ, Getka K, Jonson S. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the military patient. Mil Med. 1998. 163:17–19.
Article
9. Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR Jr. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2003. 31:2–11.
Article
10. Goldblatt JP, Fitzsimmons SE, Balk E, Richmond JC. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 2005. 21:791–803.
Article
11. Johnson RJ, Eriksson E, Haggmark T, Pope MH. Five- to ten-year follow-up evaluation after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984. 183:122–140.
Article
12. Kousa P, Jarvinen TL, Vihavainen M, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med. 2003. 31:174–181.
Article
13. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J. A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2005. 21:34–42.
Article
14. Leis HT, Sanders TG, Larsen KM, Lancaster-Weiss KJ, Miller MD. Hamstring regrowth following harvesting for ACL reconstruction: the lizard tail phenomenon. J Knee Surg. 2003. 16:159–164.
15. Maeda A, Shino K, Horibe S, Nakata K, Buccafusca G. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multistranded autogenous semitendinosus tendon. Am J Sports Med. 1996. 24:504–509.
Article
16. Marumoto JM, Mitsunaga MM, Richardson AB, Medoff RJ, Mayfield GW. Late patellar tendon ruptures after removal of the central third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A report of two cases. Am J Sports Med. 1996. 24:698–701.
17. Ohkoshi Y, Inoue C, Yamane S, Hashimoto T, Ishida R. Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy. 1998. 14:580–584.
Article
18. Scheffler SU, Sudkamp NP, Gockenjan A, Hoffmann RF, Weiler A. Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: the impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy. 2002. 18:304–315.
19. Scranton PE Jr, Bagenstose JE, Lantz BA, Friedman MJ, Khalfayan EE, Auld MK. Quadruple hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter study. Arthroscopy. 2002. 18:715–724.
20. Simonian PT, Mann FA, Mandt PR. Indirect forces and patella fracture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar ligament. Case report. Am J Knee Surg. 1995. 8:60–64.
21. Tadokoro K, Matsui N, Yagi M, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S. Evaluation of hamstring strength and tendon regrowth after harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2004. 32:1644–1650.
Article
22. Tetsumura S, Fujita A, Nakajima M, Abe M. Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods on the tibial side in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in porcine tibial bone. J Orthop Sci. 2006. 11:278–282.
Article
23. Zantop T, Weimann A, Rummler M, Hassenpflug J, Petersen W. Initial fixation strength of two bioabsorbable pins for the fixation of hamstring grafts compared to interference screw fixation: single cycle and cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med. 2004. 32:641–649.
Full Text Links
  • JKOA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr