J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2009 Oct;44(5):514-519. 10.4055/jkoa.2009.44.5.514.

Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty using Large Heads in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea. cmr0426@cu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare the short-term clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a large diameter femoral head (36 mm) and bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BA) in physiologically active elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This non-concurrent clinical trial included 169 patients with femoral neck fractures, who had been treated with prosthetic replacement from February 2004 and June 2007. Eighty-nine and 80 cases underwent BA and THA, respectively. The mean follow-up period was 36 months (18-52). The clinical outcomes were analyzed, and the latest follow-up radiographs were assessed to determine the number of complications. RESULTS: The mean operation time was longer in the THA group. The pain, mobility, and walking ability factors were better in the THA group than in the BA group. There was no limitation in the range of motion in the early post-operative period and no dislocations were encountered in either group. CONCLUSION: THA with a large diameter femoral head is recommended for the management of patients with femoral neck fractures.

Keyword

Femur; Neck fracture; Bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BA); Total hip arthroplasty (THA); Large head (36 mm)

MeSH Terms

Aged
Arthroplasty
Dislocations
Femoral Neck Fractures
Femur
Femur Neck
Follow-Up Studies
Head
Hemiarthroplasty
Hip
Humans
Range of Motion, Articular
Tacrine
Walking
Tacrine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) AP radiograph of the pelvis of a 75-year-old woman with Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in left hip. Postoperative radiograph shows 18 months, the Harris hip score was excellent. (B) AP radiograph of the pelvis at postoperative 21 months shows the upward migration of the bipolar cup. The Merle d'Aubigne and Postel classification was 3 in the pain factor and 3 in the walking ability factor.


Cited by  1 articles

Femoral Head Size of 36 mm against Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene in Patients Younger than 60 Years: Minimun Three Years of Follow Up
Chang-Min Park, Myung-Rae Cho, Shin-Kun Kim, Won-Kwon Choo, Jai-Bum Kwon
J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2012;47(1):28-34.    doi: 10.4055/jkoa.2012.47.1.28.


Reference

1. Parker MJ. The management of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000. 82:937–941.
Article
2. Lu Yao GL, Keller RB, Littenberg B, Wennberg JE. Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994. 76:15–25.
3. Chua D, Jagal SB, Schatzker J. An orthopaedic surgeon survey on the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture: opposing views. Can J Surg. 1997. 40:271–277.
4. Sierra RJ, Cabanela ME. Conversion of failed hip arthroplasties after femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. 399:129–139.
5. Karthik K, George T. Functional outcome of fracture neck of femur treated with total hip replacement versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in a South Asian population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006. 126:545–548.
6. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF. Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty. Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. 88:249–260.
7. Burroughs BR, Rubash HE, Harris WH. Femoral head sizes larger than 32 mm against highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006. 405:150–157.
Article
8. Geller JA, Malchau H, Bragdon C, Green M, Harris WH, Freiberg AA. Large diameter femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006. 447:53–59.
Article
9. Harris WH. Highly cross-linked, electron-beam-irradiated, melted polyethylene: some pros. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004. 429:63–67.
10. Cho MR, Lee HS. Early results after the treatment with total hip arthroplasty with larger diameter femoral head versus bipolar arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. The Journal of Korean Hip Societ. 2007. 19:463–467.
Article
11. Cho MR, Chae SB. A use of large femoral head in total hip arthroplasty -Early Follow-up Results-. J Korean Hip Soc. 2007. 19:150–154.
Article
12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975. 12:189–198.
13. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of results evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969. 51:737–755.
14. d'Aubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954. 36:451–475.
15. Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH. Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors govering bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987. 69:45–55.
16. Barrack RL, Mulory JR, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12 year radiologic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992. 74:385–389.
17. Wazir NN, Mukundala VV, Choon DS. Early results of prosthetic hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in active elderly patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006. 14:43–46.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr