1. Burke FJ. Light-activated composites. the current status. Dent Update. 1985. 12:182184–188.
2. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass ionomer cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1988. 59:297–300.
3. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent. 1996. 21:17–24.
4. Hansen EK. Visible light-cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scand J Dent Res. 1982. 90(4):329–335.
Article
5. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater. 1993. 01. 9:6–10.
Article
6. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative system. J Dent. 1995. 23:183–189.
7. Goracci G, Mori G, De Martinis LC. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int. 1996. 27:355–362.
8. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of a light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. J Dent. 1997. 25:321–330.
Article
9. Kanca J 3rd, Suh BI. Pulse activation. Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent. 1999. 12:107–112.
10. Alonso RC, Cunha LG, Correr GM. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liners on marginal adaptation of composite restoration. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004. 62:298–304.
Article
11. Rueggeberg F. Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 1999. (25):S4–S15.
12. Obici AC, Sinhoreti MAG, Goes MF, Consani S, Sobrinho LC. Effect of photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:192–198.
13. Kim MK, Lee CY. Effect of intermittent polymerization on the rate of polymerization shrinkage, microhardness and cuspal deflection in composite resin. 2005. Yonsei University;PhD thesis.
14. Lee SY, Park SH. Measurements of shrinkage stress and reduction of inter-cuspal distance in maxillary premolars resulting from polymerization of composites and compomers. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29:346–352.
Article
15. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent. 1993. 21:39–46.
Article
16. Park SH, Jung IY, Lee KY. Development of chewing simulator. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2003. 28:34–40.
Article
17. Luescher B, Lutz F. Obschenbein H and Muehlemann HR: Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1977. 37:300–309.
Article
18. Dietschi D, Bindi G. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-compostie class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:500–509.
19. Choi IB, Park SH. Marginal adaptation of indirect composite resin systems in three different base materials. 2003. Yonsei University;MD thesis.
20. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1990. 6:167–171.
Article
21. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stress by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res. 1984. 63:146–148.
Article
22. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res. 1991. 99:440–444.
23. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997. 25:435–440.
Article
24. Alvarez-Gayosso C, Barcelo-Santana F, Guerrero-Ibarra J, Saes-Espinola G, Canseco-Martinez MA. Calculation of contraction rates due to shrinkage in light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2004. 20(3):228–235.
Article
25. Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent. 2003. 28:20–27.
26. Jung W, Park SH. The effect of additional etching on the marginal adaptation of self etching adhesives; evaluation through thermo-mechanical loading. 2005. Yonsei University;MD thesis.