Diabetes Metab J.  2014 Aug;38(4):278-284. 10.4093/dmj.2014.38.4.278.

Clinical Usefulness of Serum Cystatin C as a Marker of Renal Function

• Woo KS
• Choi JL
• Kim BR
• Kim JE
• Han JY

• KMID: 2174104
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.4.278

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Accurate renal function measurements are important in the diagnosis and treatment of kidney diseases. In contrast to creatinine, the production of serum cystatin C has been extensively reported to be unaffected by body muscle mass, age, gender, and nutritional status.
METHODS
Our study included 37 samples from diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients for whom serum creatinine tests had been requested and 40 samples from a healthy populations in Dong-A University Hospital between May 2010 and June 2010. The assay precision (i.e., the coefficient of variation) and the reference range of the serum cystatin C test were evaluated. We compared the estimated glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) based on cystatin C with those based on creatinine. Moreover, we investigated the influences of age, gender, weight, and muscle mass on serum creatinine and serum cystatin C.
RESULTS
There was a positive correlation between GFR based on creatinine and that based on cystatin C (r=0.79, P<0.0001) among the diabetic CKD patients. Serum creatinine and cystatin C were significantly correlated with body weight and muscle mass, but the strengths of these correlations were greater for serum creatinine. The precision study revealed excellent results for both the high and low controls. The 95% reference interval of cystatin C in the healthy population was 0.371 to 1.236 mg/L.
CONCLUSION
Based on these results, we conclude that, despite the strong correlation between serum creatinine and cystatin C, cystatin C is less affected by weight and muscle mass and might represent a better alternative for the assessment of renal function.

Keyword

Renal function; Serum creatinine; Serum cystatin C

MeSH Terms

Body Weight
Creatinine
Cystatin C*
Diagnosis
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Kidney Diseases
Nutritional Status
Reference Values
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
Creatinine
Cystatin C

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Strong correlations between the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and those based on the new equation in the chronic kidney disease patients (A; r=0.79, P<0.0001) and the healthy individuals (B; r=0.36, P=0.01). It is commonly accepted that correlation coefficients (r values) between 0 and 0.2 indicate no correlations, those between 0.2 and 0.4 indicate weak low correlations, those between 0.4 and 0.6 indicate moderate correlations, and those above 0.8 indicate strong correlations.

• 

  Fig. 2 Associations of serum creatinine and cystatin C with body weight, muscle mass, and age in the healthy individuals. (A) The correlation between serum creatinine and body weight (r=0.64, P<0.0001). (B) The correlation between serum creatinine and muscle mass (r=0.71, P<0.0001). (C) The correlation between serum creatinine and age (r=0.23, P=0.1462). (D) The correlation between serum cystatin C and body weight (r=0.48, P=0.0019). (E) The correlation between serum cystatin C and muscle mass (r=0.48, P=0.0021). (F) The correlation between serum cystatin C and age (r=0.16, P=0.3089).

• 

  Fig. 3 Associations of serum creatinine and cystatin C with body weight, muscle mass and age in the diabetic chronic kidney disease patients. (A) The correlation serum creatinine and body weight (r=-0.05, P=0.7348). (B) The correlation between serum creatinine and height (r=-0.12, P=0.4708). (C) The correlation between serum creatinine and age (r=-0.003, P=0.9833). (D) The correlation between serum cystatin C and body weight (r=-0.29, P=0.0745). (E) The correlation between serum cystatin C and height (r=-0.24, P=0.1360). (F) The correlation between serum cystatin C and age (r=0.16, P=0.3384).

Reference

1. Shemesh O, Golbetz H, Kriss JP, Myers BD. Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. Kidney Int. 1985; 28:830–838.

2. Bjornsson TD. Use of serum creatinine concentrations to determine renal function. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1979; 4:200–222.

3. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130:461–470.

4. Gates GF. Creatinine clearance estimation from serum creatinine values: an analysis of three mathematical models of glomerular function. Am J Kidney Dis. 1985; 5:199–205.

5. Jelliffe RW, Jelliffe SM. A computer program for estimation of creatinine clearance from unstable serum creatinine levels, age, sex, and weight. Math Biosci. 1972; 14:17–24.

6. Goldberg TH, Finkelstein MS. Difficulties in estimating glomerular filtration rate in the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1987; 147:1430–1433.

7. Brion LP, Boeck MA, Gauthier B, Nussbaum MP, Schwartz GJ. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in anorectic adolescents. Pediatr Nephrol. 1989; 3:16–21.

8. Haycock GB. Creatinine, body size and renal function. Pediatr Nephrol. 1989; 3:22–24.

9. Brion LP, Fleischman AR, McCarton C, Schwartz GJ. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in low birth weight infants during the first year of life: noninvasive assessment of body composition and growth. J Pediatr. 1986; 109:698–707.

10. Seikaly MG, Browne R, Bajaj G, Arant BS Jr. Limitations to body length/serum creatinine ratio as an estimate of glomerular filtration in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 1996; 10:709–711.

11. Filler G, Bokenkamp A, Hofmann W, Le Bricon T, Martinez-Bru C, Grubb A. Cystatin C as a marker of GFR: history, indications, and future research. Clin Biochem. 2005; 38:1–8.

12. Macdonald J, Marcora S, Jibani M, Roberts G, Kumwenda M, Glover R, Barron J, Lemmey A. GFR estimation using cystatin C is not independent of body composition. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48:712–719.

13. Groesbeck D, Kottgen A, Parekh R, Selvin E, Schwartz GJ, Coresh J, Furth S. Age, gender, and race effects on cystatin C levels in US adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3:1777–1785.

14. Knight EL, Verhave JC, Spiegelman D, Hillege HL, de Zeeuw D, Curhan GC, de Jong PE. Factors influencing serum cystatin C levels other than renal function and the impact on renal function measurement. Kidney Int. 2004; 65:1416–1421.

15. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Bergert J, Larson TS. Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations. Kidney Int. 2006; 69:399–405.

16. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002; 40:221–226.

17. Hojs R, Bevc S, Antolinc B, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in the elderly. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res. 2004; 24:49–54.

18. Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006; 21:1855–1862.

19. Tholen DW. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods: approved guideline. 2nd ed. Wayne: NCCLS;2004.

20. Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, Fleming J, Greenberg N, Greene T, Hostetter T, Levey AS, Panteghini M, Welch M, Eckfeldt JH. National Kidney Disease Education Program Laboratory Working Group. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem. 2006; 52:5–18.

21. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Schmid CH, Feldman HI, Froissart M, Kusek J, Rossert J, Van Lente F, Bruce RD 3rd, Zhang YL, Greene T, Levey AS. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 51:395–406.

22. Levey AS, Berg RL, Gassman JJ, Hall PM, Walker WG. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Group. Creatinine filtration, secretion and excretion during progressive renal disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 1989; 27:S73–S80.

23. Perrone RD, Madias NE, Levey AS. Serum creatinine as an index of renal function: new insights into old concepts. Clin Chem. 1992; 38:1933–1953.

24. Lawson N, Lang T, Broughton A, Prinsloo P, Turner C, Marenah C. Creatinine assays: time for action? Ann Clin Biochem. 2002; 39(Pt 6):599–602.

25. Shlipak MG. Cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease: influence of body composition. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007; 3:188–189.

26. Grubb A, Nyman U, Bjork J, Lindstrom V, Rippe B, Sterner G, Christensson A. Simple cystatin C-based prediction equations for glomerular filtration rate compared with the modification of diet in renal disease prediction equation for adults and the Schwartz and the Counahan-Barratt prediction equations for children. Clin Chem. 2005; 51:1420–1431.

27. Hoek FJ, Kemperman FA, Krediet RT. A comparison between cystatin C, plasma creatinine and the Cockcroft and Gault formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003; 18:2024–2031.

28. Larsson A, Malm J, Grubb A, Hansson LO. Calculation of glomerular filtration rate expressed in mL/min from plasma cystatin C values in mg/L. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2004; 64:25–30.

29. Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Kidney function estimating equations in patients with chronic kidney disease. Int J Clin Pract. 2011; 65:458–464.

30. Wasen E, Suominen P, Isoaho R, Mattila K, Virtanen A, Kivela SL, Irjala K. Serum cystatin C as a marker of kidney dysfunction in an elderly population. Clin Chem. 2002; 48:1138–1140.