Gut Liver.  2011 Mar;5(1):115-116.

Contrast Does Not Affect Cholangioscope Image Quality

Affiliations
  • 1Gastroenterology Service, Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. Jeffrey.laczek@us.army.mil
  • 2Division of Gastroenterology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Peroral cholangioscopy is a rapidly evolving technique that allows direct examination of the bile duct. We sought to determine if there was a difference in image quality with the cholangioscope immersed in normal saline compared with radiologic contrast or a mixture of contrast and normal saline.
METHODS
Images were captured using the SpyGlass(R) cholangioscope system (Boston Scientific Corp.) immersed in solutions ranging from 0 to 100% contrast. The images were then reviewed in a blinded fashion by a panel of 9 endoscopists with experience using the SpyGlass(R) system. The reviewers scored the quality of each image based on a scale of 0 (extremely poor) to 10 (excellent).
RESULTS
With the cholangioscope immersed in saline and 100% contrast, the mean image quality scores were 7.6 (95% confi dence interval [CI], 6.7-8.5) and 6.9 (95% CI, 5.8-8.0), respectively. The highest mean image quality score was 7.8 (95% CI, 6.7-8.9), obtained in 70% contrast. No signifi cant difference was noted in mean image quality scores using a one way analysis of variance technique (p=0.414).
CONCLUSIONS
Although there are limitations to ex vivo studies, we encourage endoscopists to use intraductal contrast prior to peroral cholangioscopy, if needed for lesion localization.

Keyword

Bile ducts; Endoscopes; Cholangiopancreatography; Endoscopic retrograde

MeSH Terms

Bile Ducts
Endoscopes
Full Text Links
  • GNL
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr