Healthc Inform Res.  2015 Oct;21(4):251-254. 10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.251.

Prerequisites for Effective Implementation of Telemedicine: Focusing on Current Situations in Korea

• Lee HY
• Lee JS
• Kim J

• KMID: 2166874
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2015.21.4.251

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
The practice of telemedicine requires social interventions and systems for efficient implementation. Further, it requires sufficient discussions among related parties because the purpose of telemedicine is diagnosis and treatment, and the participation of medical specialists is essential. Based on the characteristics of the healthcare structure of Korea, which has a low proportion of public healthcare and most patients are taken care of by a few large tertiary care hospitals, the fundamental issues need to be discussed.
METHODS
A comparison was conducted with overseas cases to discuss the prerequisites for the effective implementation of telemedicine in South Korea under the current situation. We also examined the structural characteristics of the Korean medical community.
RESULTS
The current paper recommends that an in-depth analysis and studies are conducted on the following aspects: a search for telemedicine services focused on public healthcare, a search of services for illnesses that impose high levels of burden on households, and the development and implementation of a telemedicine system for follow-up management at primary and secondary care hospitals after the patient undergoes surgery or treatment at tertiary care hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS
As the technology develops, the focus should also be on factors such as safety, usefulness, availability, and how the functions will be realized in order to enable user communication. A clear system should be established to regulate and manage the lack of sufficient discussions. In addition, seeking projects and systems that reflect the characteristics of each country will facilitate the efficient implementation of telemedicine.

Keyword

Telemedicine; Telehealth; Health Policy

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care
Diagnosis
Family Characteristics
Follow-Up Studies
Health Policy
Humans
Korea*
Secondary Care
Specialization
Telemedicine*
Tertiary Healthcare

Reference

1. Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. MERS statistics [Internet]. Sejong, Korea: Korea Centers for Disease Control & Prevention;2015. cited at 2015 July 25. Available form: http://www.mers.go.kr/mers/html/jsp/Menu_C/list_C4.jsp?menuIds=&fid=5767&q_type=&q_value=&cid=64414&pageNum=.

2. Kim CL. America, Australia, South Korea 'telemedicine' case studies comparative analysis. In : Proceedings of 2014 World Conference for Public Administration; 2014 Jun 25-27; Daegu, Korea. p. 30.

3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Internet economy outlook 2012 [Internet]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development;2012. cited at 2015 Oct 4. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecd-interneteconomy-outlook-2012-9789264086463-en.htm.

4. The u-Healthcare industrial market and company analysis. Seoul, Korea: Korea Medical Device Policy Development Institute;2012.

5. Korea Ubiquitous-Health Association. The current state of telemedicine introduction of doctor-patient [Internet]. Seoul, Korea: Korea Ubiquitous-Health Asso cia tion;2013. cited at 2015 Oct 1. Available from: http://www.u-health.or.kr/information/sub01.php?tid=21&find_method=&find_str=&uid=628&mode=view.

6. Korea Ministry of Health & Welfare. Telemedicine pilot project demonstrated the number of participating organizations target application [Internet]. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2014. cited at 2015 Oct 1. Available from: http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=307484&page=1.

7. Kim YN, Park JH. Proposal for a strategic approach and solve problems of telemedicine [Internet]. Daegu, Korea: The Institute for the Future of State;2014. cited at 2015 Oct 1. Available from: http://www.ifs.or.kr/modules/board/bd_view.asp?no=151&ListBlock=&gotopage=1&Pagecount=1&sk=bd_title&sv=%BF%F8%B0%DD%C0%C7%B7%E1&id=research&ca_no=&mncode=&left=&top=&author=&top=2.

8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD health statistics 2015 [Internet]. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development;2015. cite at 2015 Oct 1. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm.

9. Seo NK, Ahn SJ, Hwang YH, Kim JH, Kim CH, Bea SK, et al. Healthcare in Korea at Korea Medical Panel (2008-2012). Seoul, Korea: National Health Insurance service;2014.

10. Kim HL, Yeo JY, Jung ES. Current situation and improvement of the national health fund projects. Seoul, Korea: Korea Institute Health and Social Affairs;2013.

11. Lee JE, Shin DW, Cho BL. The current status of cancer survivorship care and a consideration of appropriate care model in Korea. Korean J Clin Oncol. 2015; 10(2):58–62.

12. Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(32):5117–5124.

13. Brebner JA, Brebner EM, Ruddick-Bracken H. Experience-based guidelines for the implementation of telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare. 2005; 11:Suppl 1. 3–5.