Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Aug;38(4):443-449. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.4.443.

Prognosis for Patients With Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Combined With Cervical Radiculopathy

• Kim SY
• Kim TU
• Lee SJ
• Hyun JK

• KMID: 2165726
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.4.443

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To delineate cervical radiculopathy that is found in combination with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and to determine whether attendant cervical radiculopathy affects the prognosis and functional outcome for SCI patients.
METHODS
A total of 66 patients diagnosed with traumatic cervical SCI were selected for neurological assessment (using the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury [ISNCSCI]) and functional evaluation (based on the Korean version Modified Barthel Index [K-MBI] and Functional Independence Measure [FIM]) at admission and upon discharge. All of the subjects received a preliminary electrophysiological assessment, according to which they were divided into two groups as follows: those with cervical radiculopathy (the SCI/Rad group) and those without (the SCI group).
RESULTS
A total of 32 patients with cervical SCI (48.5%) had cervical radiculopathy. The initial ISNCSCI scores for sensory and motor, K-MBI, and total FIM did not significantly differ between the SCI group and the SCI/Rad group. However, at discharge, the ISNCSCI scores for motor, K-MBI, and FIM of the SCI/Rad group showed less improvement (5.44+/-8.08, 15.19+/-19.39 and 10.84+/-11.49, respectively) than those of the SCI group (10.76+/-9.86, 24.79+/-19.65 and 17.76+/-15.84, respectively) (p<0.05). In the SCI/Rad group, the number of involved levels of cervical radiculopathy was negatively correlated with the initial and follow-up motors score by ISNCSCI.
CONCLUSION
Cervical radiculopathy is not rare in patients with traumatic cervical SCI, and it can impede neurological and functional improvement. Therefore, detection of combined cervical radiculopathy by electrophysiological assessment is essential for accurate prognosis of cervical SCI patients in the rehabilitation unit.

Keyword

Spinal cord injuries; Radiculopathy; Prognosis; Electrophysiology; Patient outcome assessment

MeSH Terms

Classification
Electrophysiology
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Patient Outcome Assessment
Prognosis*
Radiculopathy*
Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injuries*

Reference

1. Hyun JK, Kim HW. Clinical and experimental advances in regeneration of spinal cord injury. J Tissue Eng. 2010; 2010:650857. PMID: 21350645.

2. Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Hoekema J, Boyd M, Noonan V, Wing PC, et al. Factors predicting motor recovery and functional outcome after traumatic central cord syndrome: a long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30:2303–2311. PMID: 16227894.

3. Pollard ME, Apple DF. Factors associated with improved neurologic outcomes in patients with incomplete tetraplegia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28:33–39. PMID: 12544952.

4. Curt A, Dietz V. Electrophysiological recordings in patients with spinal cord injury: significance for predicting outcome. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37:157–165. PMID: 10213324.

5. Akita S, Wada E, Kawai H. Combined injuries of the brachial plexus and spinal cord. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88:637–641. PMID: 16645111.

6. Rhee PC, Pirola E, Hebert-Blouin MN, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, Bishop AT, et al. Concomitant traumatic spinal cord and brachial plexus injuries in adult patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:2271–2277. PMID: 22258773.

7. Dubuisson AS, Kline DG. Brachial plexus injury: a survey of 100 consecutive cases from a single service. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51:673–683. PMID: 12188945.

8. Midha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a multitrauma population. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40:1182–1189. PMID: 9179891.

9. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011; 34:535–546. PMID: 22330108.

10. Chae SH, Lee SJ, Kim MS, Kim TU, Hyun JK. Cervical multifidus muscle atrophy in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2010; 34:743–751.

11. Dumitru D, Zwarts MJ. Radiculopathies. In : Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ, editors. Electrodiagnostic medicine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Haley & Belfus;2002. p. 713–776.

12. Grundy DJ, Silver JR. Combined brachial plexus and spinal cord trauma. Injury. 1983; 15:57–61. PMID: 6885149.

13. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, Coleman WP, Tuszynski MH, Lammertse D, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45:190–205. PMID: 17179973.

14. Harrop JS, Naroji S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, Tjoumakaris SI, Frank B, et al. Neurologic improvement after thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spinal cord (conus medullaris) injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36:21–25. PMID: 21192220.