Clin Endosc.  2014 Jan;47(1):79-83.

Diagnostic Yield and Therapeutic Impact of Rectal Retroflexion: A Prospective, Single-Blind Study Conducted in Three Centers

• Tellez-Avila F
• Barahona-Garrido J
• Garcia-Osogobio S
• Lopez-Arce G
• Camacho-Escobedo J
• Saul A
• Herrera-Gomez S
• Elizondo-Rivera J
• Barreto-Zuniga R

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
No clear data have been established and validated regarding whether rectal retroflexion has an important and therapeutic impact. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of rectal retroflexion compared with straight view examination.
METHODS
A prospective single-blind study was conducted. Consecutive patients evaluated between October 2011 and April 2012 were included.
RESULTS
A total of 934 patients (542 women, 58%) were included. The mean age was 57.4+/-14.8 years. Retroflexion was successful in 917 patients (98.2%). Distinct lesions in the anorectal area were detected in 32 patients (3.4%), of which 10 (1%) were identified only on retroflex view and 22 (2.4%) on both straight and retroflex views. Of the 32 identified lesions, 16 (50%) were polyps, nine (28.1%) were angiodysplasias, six (18.8%) were ulcers, and one (3.1%) was a flat lesion. All 10 patients (1%) in whom lesions were detected only by rectal retroflexion showed a therapeutic impact.
CONCLUSIONS
Rectal retroflexion has minimal diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact. However, its low rate of major complications and the possibility of detecting lesions undetectable by straight viewing justify its use.

Keyword

Colonoscopy; Retroflexion; Rectum; Colorectal polyps

MeSH Terms

Angiodysplasia
Colonoscopy
Female
Humans
Polyps
Prospective Studies*
Rectum
Single-Blind Method*
Ulcer

Reference

1. Fu K, Ikematsu H, Sugito M, et al. Iatrogenic perforation of the colon following retroflexion maneuver. Endoscopy. 2007; 39(Suppl 1):E175. PMID: 17614078.

2. Chu Q, Petros JG. Extraperitoneal rectal perforation due to retroflexion fiberoptic proctoscopy. Am Surg. 1999; 65:81–85. PMID: 9915539.

3. Ahlawat SK, Charabaty A, Benjamin S. Rectal perforation caused by retroflexion maneuver during colonoscopy: closure with endoscopic clips. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:771–773. PMID: 18206880.

4. Quallick MR, Brown WR. Rectal perforation during colonoscopic retroflexion: a large, prospective experience in an academic center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:960–963. PMID: 19327487.

5. Cutler AF, Pop A. Fifteen years later: colonoscopic retroflexion revisited. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999; 94:1537–1538. PMID: 10364021.

6. Varadarajulu S, Ramsey WH. Utility of retroflexion in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001; 32:235–237. PMID: 11246352.

7. Hanson JM, Atkin WS, Cunliffe WJ, et al. Rectal retroflexion: an essential part of lower gastrointestinal endoscopic examination. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44:1706–1708. PMID: 11711746.

8. Grobe JL, Kozarek RA, Sanowski RA. Colonoscopic retroflexion in the evaluation of rectal disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1982; 77:856–858. PMID: 7137139.

9. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:1977–1981. PMID: 8247072.

10. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69(3 Pt 2):620–625. PMID: 19136102.

11. Saad A, Rex DK. Routine rectal retroflexion during colonoscopy has a low yield for neoplasia. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14:6503–6505. PMID: 19030202.