Clin Endosc.  2014 Sep;47(5):460-463. 10.5946/ce.2014.47.5.460.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling of a Metastatic Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Mimicking a Gastric Subepithelial Tumor

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. iman0825@naver.com
  • 3Department of Pathology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma of appendix origin and mimicking a gastric subepithelial tumor (SET) is very rare. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling is a useful diagnostic method for SETs. However, the cytologic findings of metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma are unfamiliar to many pathologists and gastroenterologists. These findings present a diagnostic challenge because the introduction of gastric epithelium and mucin into the specimen during the procedure can be misleading. This is the first reported experience of an EUS-guided sampling of a gastric SET in a patient with suspected appendiceal tumor, to make the diagnosis of a mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Keyword

Appendix; Endosonography; Biopsy, fine-needle; Adenocarcinoma, mucinous; Stomach

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous*
Appendix
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Diagnosis
Endosonography
Epithelium
Humans
Mucins
Stomach
Ultrasonography
Mucins

Reference

1. Holland JF, Frei E, Bast RC, Morton DL. Tumours of appendix. In : Holland JF, Frei E, Bast RC, Morton DL, editors. Cancer Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger;1993.
2. Lee NK, Kim S, Kim GH, et al. Hypervascular subepithelial gastrointestinal masses: CT-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2010; 30:1915–1934. PMID: 21057127.
Article
3. Que Y, Tao C, Wang X, Zhang Y, Chen B. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: some different sonographic findings. Abdom Imaging. 2012; 37:843–848. PMID: 22234650.
Article
4. Peter S, Eltoum I, Eloubeidi MA. EUS-guided FNA of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with unknown primary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70:1266–1270. PMID: 19640520.
Article
5. Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Gupta R, Singh K. EUS-guided FNA of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:188–189. PMID: 21184887.
Article
6. Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi A, et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:897–912. PMID: 21842456.
Article
7. Emerson RE, Randolph ML, Cramer HM. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas is highly predictive of pancreatic neoplasia. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006; 34:457–462. PMID: 16783773.
Article
8. Toll AD, Bibbo M. Identification of gastrointestinal contamination in endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol. 2010; 54:245–248. PMID: 20518405.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr