J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2016 Apr;51(2):158-164. 10.4055/jkoa.2016.51.2.158.

Clinical Result in Conservative Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

• Choi ES
• Park SJ

• KMID: 2162051
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2016.51.2.158

Abstract

PURPOSE
We evaluate the clinical results of conservative treatment in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From January 2010 to May 2013, 49 patients with acute ACL injury who received conservative treatment were selected as subjects. All ruptures were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Sixteen patients had partial ruptures and 33 patients had complete ruptures. The average age was 37.6 years; males were 39, and females were 10. Conservative treatment included a long leg cast for 6 weeks and isotonic exercise for quadriceps and hamstring. Knee joint instability was evaluated with the side-to-side difference using the Telos device. Tegner activity score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and range of motion in the joint were assessed in all patients.
RESULTS
In the final follow-up, the mean value of the Tegner activity score was 6.30 points (3-8 points), and the mean value of the IKDC score was 84.7 points (51.7-97.7 points). The mean value of side-to-side difference using the Telos device was 2.74 points (0.51-7.46 points).
CONCLUSION
Our study suggests that acute ACL injury diagnosed by MRI can be treated conservatively in appropriate patients, with favorable results.

Keyword

anterior cruciate ligament; conservative treatment

MeSH Terms

Anterior Cruciate Ligament*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Joints
Knee
Knee Joint
Leg
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Range of Motion, Articular
Rupture

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 The sagittal image of magnetic resonance imaging shows an anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Reference

1. Muneta T, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Ogiuchi T, Yamamoto H, Shinomiya K. Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with endobuttons: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15:618–624.

2. Butler DL, Noyes FR, Grood ES. Ligamentous restraints to anterior-posterior drawer in the human knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62:259–270.

3. Grood ES, Suntay WJ, Noyes FR, Butler DL. Biomechanics of the knee-extension exercise: effect of cutting the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66:725–734.

4. Andriacchi TP, Mündermann A, Smith RL, Alexander EJ, Dyrby CO, Koo S. A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004; 32:447–457.

5. Spindler KP, Schils JP, Bergfeld JA, et al. Prospective study of osseous, articular, and meniscal lesions in recent anterior cruciate ligament tears by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21:551–557.

6. Jomha NM, Pinczewski LA, Clingeleffer A, Otto DD. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with patellar-tendon autograft and interference screw fixation. The results at seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81:775–779.

7. Strehl A, Eggli S. The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). J Trauma. 2007; 62:1159–1162.

8. Streich NA, Zimmermann D, Bode G, Schmitt H. Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop. 2011; 35:607–613.

9. Odensten M, Hamberg P, Nordin M, Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Surgical or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament. A randomized study with short-term follow-up observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; 198:87–93.

10. Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000; 8:141–150.

11. Ruiz AL, Kelly M, Nutton RW. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction: a 5-9 year follow-up. Knee. 2002; 9:197–200.

12. Fujimoto E, Sumen Y, Ochi M, Ikuta Y. Spontaneous healing of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries - conservative treatment using an extension block soft brace without anterior stabilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002; 122:212–216.

13. Kostogiannis I, Ageberg E, Neuman P, Dahlberg L, Fridén T, Roos H. Activity level and subjective knee function 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective, longitudinal study of nonreconstructed patients. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35:1135–1143.

14. Ciccotti MG, Lombardo SJ, Nonweiler B, Pink M. Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. Results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 76:1315–1321.

15. Malanga GA, Giradi J, Nadler SF. The spontaneous healing of a torn anterior cruciate ligament. Clin J Sport Med. 2001; 11:118–120.

16. Tang Z, Yang L, Wang Y, et al. Contributions of different intraarticular tissues to the acute phase elevation of synovial fluid MMP-2 following rat ACL rupture. J Orthop Res. 2009; 27:243–248.

17. Woo SL, Chan SS, Yamaji T. Biomechanics of knee ligament healing, repair and reconstruction. J Biomech. 1997; 30:431–439.

18. Ihara H, Miwa M, Deya K, Torisu K. MRI of anterior cruciate ligament healing. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996; 20:317–321.

19. Costa-Paz M, Ayerza MA, Tanoira I, Astoul J, Muscolo DL. Spontaneous healing in complete ACL ruptures: a clinical and MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470:979–985.

20. Subhas N, Kao A, Freire M, Polster JM, Obuchowski NA, Winalski CS. MRI of the knee ligaments and menisci: comparison of isotropic-resolution 3D and conventional 2D fast spinecho sequences at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011; 197:442–450.

21. Korn A, Horger M, Albrecht D, Fenchel M, Nägele T, Luz O. Bucket handle tears. Rofo. 2011; 183:91–94.

22. Robertson PL, Schweitzer ME, Bartolozzi AR, Ugoni A. Anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of multiple signs with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994; 193:829–834.

23. Ahldén M, Hoshino Y, Samuelsson K, Araujo P, Musahl V, Karlsson J. Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20:621–632.

24. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L. Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med. 1985; 13:401–407.

25. Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H. The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8:36–39.

26. Huber FE, Irrgang JJ, Harner C, Lephart S. Intratester and intertester reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in the assessment of posterior laxity of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25:479–485.

27. Muellner T, Bugge W, Johansen S, Holtan C, Engebretsen L. Inter- and intratester comparison of the Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester's experience and the examination technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9:302–306.

28. Jardin C, Chantelot C, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Debroucker MJ, Duquennoy A. Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in measuring anterior laxity of the knee: comparative analysis with Telos of 48 reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament and intra- and interobserver reproducibility. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999; 85:698–707.

29. Panisset JC, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Dejour D. A comparison of Telos™ stress radiography versus Rolimeter™ in the diagnosis of different patterns of anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98:751–758.

30. Lefevre N, Bohu Y, Naouri JF, Klouche S, Herman S. Validity of GNRB® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22:285–290.