Yonsei Med J.  2005 Oct;46(5):614-624. 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.614.

Development of the Somatic Stress Response Scale and Its Application in Clinical Practice

• Koh KB
• Park JK
• Cho S

• KMID: 2158139
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2005.46.5.614

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop the Somatic Stress Response Scale (SSRS), and then to use the scale in clinical practice. A preliminary survey was conducted using 109 healthy adults to obtain somatic stress responses. Then, 215 healthy subjects completed a preliminary questionnaire. A comparison was made regarding the somatic stress responses among 191 patients (71 with anxiety disorders, 73 with depressive disorders and 47 with somatoform disorders) and 215 healthy subjects. Factor analysis of the SSRS yielded five subscales: the cardiorespiratory response, somatic sensitivity, gastrointestinal response, general somatic response and genitourinary response subscales. The test-retest reliability for the five subscales and the total score was significantly high, ranging from .86 to .94. The Cronbach's yen afor the five subscales ranged from .72 to .92, and was .95 for the total score. By correlating the five subscales and the total score of the SSRS with the somatization subscale scores of the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), convergent validity was calculated. The correlations were all at significant levels. Each of the disorder groups was significantly higher in scores of the cardiorespiratory response, gastrointestinal response, general somatic response and genitourinary response subscale, and in the total SSRS score than the healthy group. Only the depressive disorder group scored significantly higher on the somatic sensitivity subscale than the healthy group, and they also scored significantly higher on the genitourinary response subscale than the anxiety disorder group did. These results suggest that the SSRS is highly reliable and valid, and that it can be effectively utilized as a measure for research of the somatic symptoms related to stress. It also implies that somatic sensitivity and genitourinary responses are associated with depressive disorders.

Keyword

Somatic stress response scale; reliability; validity; anxiety disorders; depressive disorder; somatoform disorders

MeSH Terms

Stress, Psychological/*diagnosis
Somatoform Disorders/*psychology
*Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Middle Aged
Male
Humans
Female
Depressive Disorder/*psychology
Demography
Anxiety Disorders/*psychology
Aged
Adult

Reference

1. Cotton DHG. Stress management - an integrated approach to therapy. 1990. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

2. Ogden J. Health psychology: a textbook. 1996. Philadelphia: Open University Press;200.

3. Kasprowicz AL, Manuck SB, Malkoff SB, Krantz DS. Individual differences in behaviorally evoked cardiovascular response: temporal stability and hemodynamic patterning. Psychophysiology. 1990. 27:605–619.

4. Krantz DS, Manuck SB. Acute psychophysiologic reactivity and risk of cardiovascular disease: a review and methodologic critique. Psychol Bull. 1984. 96:435–464.

5. Matthews KA, Weiss SM, Detre T, Dembroski TM, Falkner B, Manuck SB, et al. Handbook of stress, reactivity, and cardiovascular disease. 1986. New York: Wiley.

6. Katkin ES, Dermit S, Wine SKF. Goldberg L, Breznitz S, editors. Psychophysiological assessment of stress. Handbook of stress - theoretical and clinical aspects. 1993. 2nd ed. New York: The Free Press;142–157.

7. Girdano DA, Everly GS. Controlling stress and tension: a holistic approach. 1979. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

8. Koh KB. Stress and psychosomatic medicine. 2002. Seoul: Il Cho Kak;77–91.

9. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Linzer M, deGruy FV 3rd, Hahn SR, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994. 272:1749–1756.

10. Ormel J, VonKorff M, Ustun TB, Pini S, Korten A, Oldehinkel T. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care. JAMA. 1994. 272:1741–1748.

11. Kroenke K. Somatization in primary care: it's time for parity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000. 22:141–143.

12. Park YN. Clinical review of psychiatric outpatients complaining of somatic symptoms. J Kyemyung Med School. 1984. 3:169–174.

13. Pennebacker JW, Burnam MA, Schaeffer MA, Harper DC. Lack of control as a determinant of perceived physical symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1977. 35:167–174.

14. Won HT, Shin HK. Cognitive characteristics of somatization (1): validity and reliability of the Korean version of somatic sensation amplification scale. J Korean Psychol Assoc. 1998. 1:33–39.

15. Min SK. A study of the concept of Hwabyung. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989. 28:604–615.

16. Lee SH. Study of Hwabyung. J Korean Hospital. 1977. 1:63–69.

17. Kim KI. Clinical study of primary depressive symptom-part II: symptom pattern of the Korean depressive. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1977. 16:46–52.

18. Kim MJ, Kim KI. Clinical study of somatization. Mental Health Res. 1984. 2:137–158.

19. Lin KM. Hwa-Byung - a Korean culture-bound syndrome? Am J Psychiatry. 1983. 140:105–107.

20. Pang KYC. Hwabyung - the construction of a Korean popular illness among Korean elderly immigrant women in the United States. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1990. 14:495–512.

21. Wahler HJ. Wahler physical symptoms inventory manual. 1983. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

22. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-15: validity of a new measure for evaluating the severity of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med. 2002. 64:258–266.

23. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and MMPI - a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1976. 128:280–289.

24. Koh KB, Park J, Kim CH. Development of the stress response inventory. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2000. 39:707–719.

25. American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 1994. 4th ed. Washington DC: Am Psychiatric Assoc.

26. Kim KI, Kim JH, Won HT. Korean manual of symptom checklist-90-revision. 1984. Seoul: Chung Ang Aptitude Publishing Co;1–39.