Cancer Res Treat.  2016 Jan;48(1):384-392. 10.4143/crt.2014.280.

Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer: A Dyadic Examination

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine and Health Promotion Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Cancer Survivorship Clinic, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Counseling Psychology, Hanyang Cyber University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Cancer Policy Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. jonghyock@gmail.com
  • 5Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAHIST and School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea, Korea.
  • 6Department of Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 7Department of Epidemiology, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 8Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Chonbuk National University School of Medicine, Cheonju, Korea.
  • 9Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Medical Center, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 10Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 11College of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to examine the following questions: to what extent do patients and caregivers perceive their family members to be avoidant of communication regarding patient's cancer, and to what extent do these perceptions interrelate; and how do such perceptions influence their own and each other's communication behaviors, communication outcome, mental health, and quality of life.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A national survey was performed with 990 patient-caregiver dyads (participation rate, 76.2%). To examine the dyadic interaction, we developed linked patient and family member questionnaires, including the Family Avoidance of Communication about Cancer (FACC) scale.
RESULTS
The mean scores (standard deviations) of patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were low at 10.9 (15.5) and 15.5 (17.5), respectively (p < 0.001), and concordance was low, a well (Spearman's rho, 0.23). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with lower levels of disclosure and behaviors of holding back communication, as well as lower levels of mental health outcome and quality of life. The same was true for caregivers (all p < 0.05). Patient-perceived FACC was associated with caregiver holding back, caregiver's depression level, and caregiver quality of life (all p < 0.05). Both patient- and caregiver-perceived FACC were independently associated with communication difficulty within the family.
CONCLUSION
Future research would benefit from the measurement of FACC from both patients and caregivers, and promote family intervention to enhance openness to communication, which would be helpful for improving mental health and quality of life for both patients and caregivers.

Keyword

Neoplasms; Caregivers; Communication; Avoidance; Openness

MeSH Terms

Caregivers
Depression
Disclosure
Humans
Mental Health
Quality of Life

Reference

References

1. Harris J, Bowen DJ, Badr H, Hannon P, Hay J, Regan Sterba K. Family communication during the cancer experience. J Health Commun. 2009; 14 Suppl 1:76–84.
Article
2. Gotcher JM. The effects of family communication on psychosocial adjustment of cancer patients. J Appl Commun Res. 1993; 21:176–88.
Article
3. Boehmer U, Clark JA. Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. J Fam Pract. 2001; 50:226–31.
4. Kornblith AB, Regan MM, Kim Y, Greer G, Parker B, Bennett S, et al. Cancer-related communication between female patients and male partners scale: a pilot study. Psychooncology. 2006; 15:780–94.
Article
5. Lichtman RR, Taylor SE, Wood JV. Social support and marital adjustment after breast cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1988; 5:47–74.
Article
6. Gotcher JM. Well-adjusted and maladjusted cancer patients: an examination of communication variables. Health Commun. 1995; 7:21–33.
Article
7. Heinrich RL, Schag CC, Ganz PA. Living with cancer: the Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations. J Clin Psychol. 1984; 40:972–80.
Article
8. Zhang AY, Siminoff LA. Silence and cancer: why do families and patients fail to communicate? Health Commun. 2003; 15:415–29.
Article
9. Bachner YG, Carmel S. Open communication between caregivers and terminally ill cancer patients: the role of caregivers' characteristics and situational variables. Health Commun. 2009; 24:524–31.
Article
10. Bachner YG, Gesis Z, Davidov E, Carmel S. Caregivers' communication with patients about illness and death: initial validation of a scale. Omega (Westport). 2008; 57:381–97.
Article
11. Northouse PG, Northouse LL. Communication and cancer: issues confronting patients, health professionals, and family members. J Psychosoc Oncol. 1988; 5:17–46.
12. Beach WA, Anderson JK. Communication and cancer? Part I: The noticeable absence of interactional research. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2003; 21:1–23.
13. Mallinger JB, Griggs JJ, Shields CG. Family communication and mental health after breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006; 15:355–61.
Article
14. Fletcher BS, Miaskowski C, Given B, Schumacher K. The cancer family caregiving experience: an updated and expanded conceptual model. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012; 16:387–98.
Article
15. Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Hurwitz H, Faber M. Disclosure between patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their spouses. Psychooncology. 2005; 14:1030–42.
Article
16. Siminoff LA, Zyzanski SJ, Rose JH, Zhang AY. The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF): a new measure. Psychooncology. 2008; 17:1216–24.
Article
17. Shin DW, Cho J, Roter DL, Kim SY, Sohn SK, Yoon MS, et al. Preferences for and experiences of family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: patient-caregiver dyads study. Psychooncology. 2013; 22:2624–31.
Article
18. Park B, Kim SY, Shin JY, Sanson-Fisher RW, Shin DW, Cho J, et al. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression among family caregivers of cancer patients: a nationwide survey of patient-family caregiver dyads in Korea. Support Care Cancer. 2013; 21:2799–807.
Article
19. Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D. Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2010; 4:74–85.
Article
20. Fried TR, Bradley EH, O'Leary JR, Byers AL. Unmet desire for caregiver-patient communication and increased caregiver burden. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; 53:59–65.
Article
21. Yun YH, Kwon YC, Lee MK, Lee WJ, Jung KH, Do YR, et al. Experiences and attitudes of patients with terminal cancer and their family caregivers toward the disclosure of terminal illness. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28:1950–7.
Article
22. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Kalemkerian G, Zalupski M, LoRusso P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psychooncology. 2013; 22:555–63.
Article
23. Cordova MJ, Cunningham LL, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA. Social constraints, cognitive processing, and adjustment to breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001; 69:706–11.
Article
24. Mesters I, van den Borne H, McCormick L, Pruyn J, de Boer M, Imbos T. Openness to discuss cancer in the nuclear family: scale, development, and validation. Psychosom Med. 1997; 59:269–79.
25. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer. 2007; 110:2809–18.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr