1. Jeong YY. An inducement problem on the principle liability with-out fault in a legislative bill of injury and relief in a medical accident. Korean Soc Law Med Semi. 2006; 7:271–310.
2. Kim BI. Status and problems of medical disputes by ADR. Chungnam University Legal Research. 2005; 16:240.
3. Mathew RG, Ferguson V, Hingorani M. Clinical negligence in oph-thalmology: fifteen years of national health service litigation au-thority data. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:859–64.
Article
4. Ali N. A decade of clinical negligence in ophthalmology. BMC Ophthalmol. 2007; 7:20–3.
Article
5. Cook TM, Bland L, Mihai R, Scott S. Litigation related to anaes-thesia: an analysis of claims against the NHS in England 1995- 2007. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64:706–18.
6. Lee MS, Hwangbo M, Seo HS. The judicial precedent analysis of medical litigation in the field of pediatric ophthalmology. J Korean Med Ophthalmol Otolaryngol Dermatol. 2012; 25:78–87.
Article
7. Ministry of Government Legislation. Information of Life Law. http://oneclick.law.go.kr. Accessed June 1. 2014.
8. Lee JK. A study on negligence and comparative negligence in med-ical malpractice. Inha University Graduate School of Law. 2005; 8:85–9.
9. Ambady N, Laplante D, Nguyen T, et al. Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history. Surgery. 2002; 132:5–9.
Article
10. Levinson W, Roter DL, Mullooly JP, et al. Physician-patient com-munication: the relationship with malpractice claims among pri-mary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997; 277:553–9.
11. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. http://www. gmc-uk.org/good_medical_practice_July_1998.pdf_25416527.pdf. Accessed July 1. 1998.
12. Brick DC. Risk management lessons from a review of 168 cataract surgery claims. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999; 43:356–60.
Article