J Korean Orthop Assoc.  2007 Feb;42(1):64-70. 10.4055/jkoa.2007.42.1.64.

Range of Motion after High-Flexion Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 3-year Follow Up

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Masan Medical Center, Masan, Korea.
  • 2College of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea. hychan@gaechuk.gsnu.ac.kr
  • 3 Purpose: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the factors that can be used to predict the postoperative range of motion, and to evaluate the short-term clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (SuperflexTM, Stryker Howmedica Osteo

Keyword

High flexion total knee arthroplasty; Range of motion; Follow-up interval

MeSH Terms

Arthroplasty*
Follow-Up Studies*
Knee*
Range of Motion, Articular*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cross-section schematic diagram showing the difference between the Scorpio and Superflex tibial inserts. The major difference is the larger posterior radius for the Scorpio™ insert. Note that the Superflex™ has a lower posterior lip.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Patellar tilt and (B) patella shift were measured from the 45° Merchant view.

  • Fig. 3 A 67-year old female could flex 145° at the operated left knee (A) and anteroposterior and full flexion lateral X-ray (B).

  • Fig. 4 The images show that the patient could kneel down comfortably (A) and sit cross-legged (B).


Cited by  1 articles

Influence of Patellar Tilt Angle in Merchant View on Postoperative Range of Motion in Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Substituting Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Jegyun Chon, Taehyeon Jeon, Jayeong Yoon, Deukhee Jung, Chung-Han An
Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11(4):416-421.    doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.4.416.


Reference

1. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996. 331:87–92.
Article
2. Cho SH, Ha YC, Song HR, et al. High Flex knee arthroplasty and range of motion. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2004. 39:662–667.
Article
3. Cho WS, Park JH, Kim JM, Hwang WY, Nam TS. Factors affecting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2003. 38:683–688.
Article
4. Edwards E, Miller J, Chan KH. The effect of postoperative collateral ligament laxity in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988. 236:44–51.
Article
5. Fehring TK, Valadie AL. Knee instability after total knee arthropasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. 299:157–162.
6. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. 248:13–14.
Article
7. Insall JN, Hood RW, Flawn LB, Sullivan DJ. The total condylar knee prosthesis in gonarthrosis. A five to nine-year follow-up of the first one hundred consecutive replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983. 65:619–628.
Article
8. Kanekasu K, Banks SA, Honjo S, Nakata O, Kato H. Fluoroscopic analysis of knee arthroplasty kinematics during deep flexion kneeling. J Arthroplasty. 2004. 19:998–1003.
Article
9. Lizaur A, Marco L, Cebrian R. Preoperative factors influencing the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997. 79:626–629.
Article
10. McAuley JP, Harrer MF, Ammeen D, Engh GA. Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002. 404:203–207.
Article
11. Myles CM, Rowe PJ, Walker CR, Nutton RW. Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture. 2002. 16:46–54.
Article
12. Ritter MA, Montgomery TJ, Zhou H, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB. The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999. 360:174–181.
Article
13. Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Lewis PL, Nott L. The Miller-Galante knee prosthesis of the treatment of osteoarthritis. A comparison of the results of partial fixation with cement and fixation without any cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993. 75:402–408.
14. Schurman DJ, Parker JN, Ornstein D. Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985. 67:1006–1014.
Article
15. Stern SH, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty in obese patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990. 72:1400–1404.
Article
16. Tew M, Forster IW, Wallace WA. Effect of total knee arthrolasty on maximal flexion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989. 247:168–174.
17. Warren PJ, Olanlokun TK, Cobb AG, Walker PS, Iverson BF. Laxity and function in knee replacements. A comparative study of three prosthetic designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. 305:200–208.
Article
18. Yamakado K, Kitaoka K, Yamada H, Hashiba K, Nakamura R, Tomita K. Influence of stability on range of motion after cruciate-retaining TKA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003. 123:1–4.
Article
19. Yamazaki J, Ishigami S, Nagashima M, Yoshino S. Hy-Flex II total knee system and range of motion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002. 122:156–160.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr