Prog Med Phys.  2015 Sep;26(3):178-184. 10.14316/pmp.2015.26.3.178.

Determination of Beam Quality Correction Factors for the PTW-Markus Chamber for Electron Beam Qualities R50=1.0 and 1.4 g/cm2

Affiliations
  • 1Medical Radiation Physics Laboratory, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea. physics7@empas.com
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

The Markus ionization chamber(R) is a small plane parallel ionization chamber widely used in clinical electron beam dosimetry. Plane parallel chambers were recommended for low energy electron dosimetry with the beam quality at R50<4.0 g/cm2 (E approximately 10 MeV) according to TRS-398 protocol. However, the quality correction factors (k(Q,Q0)) of the Markus chamber was not presented in TRS-398 protocol for electron beam quality at R50<2.0 g/cm2 (Eapproximately4 MeV). In this study, the k(Q,Q0) factors of the Markus chambers (PTW-34045) for beam qualities at R50=1.0, 1.4, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 5.0 g/cm2 were determined by Monte Carlo calculations (DOSRZnrc/EGSnrc) and the dosimetric formalism of quality correction factor. The derived k(Q,Q0) values were evaluated using the produced data based on TRS-398 and TG-51 protocols and known values for the Markus chamber.

Keyword

Markus chamber; Quality correction factor; Electron dosimetry

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Monte Carlo calculated quality correction factors for electron beams with mean energies between 2 and 12 MeV.

  • Fig. 2. Determined quality correction factors for Markus type ionization chamber for electron beams with beam qualities R50=1.0∼5.0 g/cm2.


Reference

References

1. Khan FM. The physics of Radiation Therapy. 4th ed.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;Philadelphia: 2010. ), pp.p. 264–314.
2. Klevenhagen SC. The physics of Electron Beam Therapy. Adam Higer Ltd.;England: 1985. ), pp.p. 67–88.
3. IAEA TRS-398. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy: An International Code of Practice for Dosimetry based on Standards of Absorbed dose to Water. Technical Report Series No. 398, Vienna,. 2000.
4. AAPM TG-51. AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 26(9):1847–1870. 1999.
5. Muir BR, Rogers DWO. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types. Med Phys. 41(11):111701–15. 2014.
Article
6. Shani G. Radiation Dosimetry 2nd ed. CRC Press, Net York (. 2000. ), pp.117–118.
7. NPL Report DQL-R001: Characterisation of two new ionisation chamber types for use in reference electron dosimetry in the UK. National Physical Laboratory, United Kingdom. 2004.
8. Zink K, Wulff J. Beam quality corrections for parallel-plate ion chambers in electron reference dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 57(7):1831–1854. 2012.
Article
9. Mihailescu D, Borcia C. Monte Carlo Simulation of the Electron Beams Produced by a Linear Accelerator for Intraoperative Radiation Therapy. Romanian Reports in Physics. 66(1):): pp.61–74. 2014.
10. IAEA TECDOC-1386: Emerging applications of radiation processing. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (. 2004.
11. Kim Sw. Kang SK, Rhee DJ, et al. Measurement of Electron Beam Output for the Prototype Compact Linac. Progress in Medical Physics. 26(1):): pp.1–5. 2015.
12. Rogers DWO, Kawrakow I, Seuntjens JP, Walters BRB, Mainegra-Hing E. NRC User Codes for EGSnrc, NRCC Report PIRS-702, National Research Council of Canada,. 2005.
13. PTW Freiburg: Information on PTW Markus Chambers Type 23343 and Type 34045. PTW Technical Note D273.200.0/2. Germany (. 2005.
14. Burns DT, Ding GX, Rogers DWO. R50 as a beam quality specifier for selecting stopping-power ratios and reference depths for electron dosimetry, Med Phys. 23(3):383–388. 1996.
15. IAEA TRS-381: The use of plane parallel ionization chambers in high-energy electron and photon beams. An International code of practice for dosimetry. Technical Report Series No. 381, Vienna. 1997.
16. IBA Dosimetry: P-Codes of Practice Absolute Dosimetry. IBA Dosimetry GmbH, Germany. (. 2012. ), pp.17–22.
17. Huq MS, Andreo P, Song H. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Phys Med Biol. 46:2985–3006. 2001.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PMP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr