Korean J Phys Anthropol.  2015 Sep;28(3):167-174. 10.11637/kjpa.2015.28.3.167.

Current Status and Suggestions for the Improvement of Gross Anatomy Education in Dental Hygiene Program

• Kim DH
• Ha JE

• KMID: 2068827
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.11637/kjpa.2015.28.3.167

Abstract

Anatomy is an essential subject for dental hygienists. As such, in order to form academic systems for dental hygiene program, we cannot ignore research related to basic dental hygiene, which is related to the main competency of a dental hygienist. This research focused on the operation status of the curriculum related to gross anatomy of the head and neck led by the department of dental hygiene and was performed in order to propose a new direction regarding academics. This research analyzed the offering status of the anatomy curriculum using shared information, released by both the Association of Korean Dental Hygienist and the homepage website of the national dental hygiene, as a foundation. In addition, we conducted a survey of 21 (25.6%) professors out of 82 dental hygiene institutions in the nation. The fill-in survey was composed in order to obtain knowledge on each department's offering and operation system of the anatomy curriculum, general characteristics of professor and demand for the anatomy education. The SPSS 20.0 Program was used to analyze all of the materials with the exception of operation statuses of anatomic curriculums constructed via open questions. Nationally, the subject related to the gross anatomy was opened in Semester 2 during the first year 56.2% of the time, and the oral anatomy class recorded the highest percentage of 45.3%. The general trend of the professors who participated in this research was the highest recording of 85.0% for holders of dental hygiene license. Those who acquired doctoral degrees were found to be 17 individuals (85.0%) and 45.0% majored in health science. The operation methods of anatomic practices were revealed to be models, drawings, and audiovisuals while external practices failed to meet even the half-point of the study. The consensus opinion has indicated the need for a integrated education with clinical subjects, cadaver practices, developments of educational media, and standardization of anatomic terminology. Standardization of educational contents and systemization of practices are necessary for the improvement of anatomic studies of students studying dental hygiene. Cultivating anatomy specialists and sharing activities between academia are required for long-term development. We expect this research to contribute to overall quality improvement and the dental hygiene profession through the establishment of majors.

Keyword

Department of dental hygiene; Gross anatomy education; Current status; Suggestions for the improvement

MeSH Terms

Cadaver
Consensus
Curriculum
Dental Hygienists
Education*
Head
Humans
Licensure
Neck
Oral Hygiene*
Quality Improvement
Specialization

Reference

References

1. Papa V, Vaccarezza M. Teaching anatomy in the ⅩⅩⅠcentury: new aspects and pitfalls. Scientific World Journal 2013. 2013. 310348.

2. Korean Research Society of Oral Anatomy. Oral Anatomy: History of the anatomy. 1st ed.Seoul: Komoonsa;2014. p. 3–4. Korean.

3. Cho YS. Comparison of curriculums of dental hygiene education programs for B.S degree. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2005; 5:251–8. Korean.

4. Kim NH, Jang SO, Jun HS, Kim YN, Chung WG. Com-parison of ideas of dental hygiene education programs between Korea and America. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2006; 6:193–9. Korean.

5. Won BY, Jang GW, Hwang MY, Kim SA, Jang JH. Development of Korean standard dental hygiene curriculum proposal. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg. 2013; 13:1–12. Korean.

6. Older J. Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon. 2004; 2:79–90.

7. Green NA. Anatomy training for surgeons-a personal viewpoint. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1998; 43:69–70.

8. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians'attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge ofmedical students. Clin Anat. 2005; 18:380–4.

9. Dolmans DH, De Grave W, Wolfhagen IH, van der Vleuten CP. Problem-based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research. Med Educ. 2005; 39:732–41.

10. Prince KJ, Van De Wiel M, Scherpbier AJ, Can Der Vleuten CP, Boshuizen HP. A qualitative analysis of the transition from theory to practice in undergraduate training in a PBL-medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2000; 5:105–16.

11. Korf HW, Wicht H, Snipes RL, Timmermans JP, Paulsen F, Rune G, et al. The dissection course-necessary and in-dispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat. 2008; 190:16–22.

12. Chapman SJ, Hakeem AR, Marangoni G, Prasad KR. Anatomy in medical education. Ann Anat. 2013; 195:409–14.

13. Arráez-Aybar LA, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Mirapeix RM, Mompeo-Corredera B, Sañudo-Tejero JR. Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Ann Anat. 2010; 192:341–8.

14. Drake RL. A unique, innovative, and clinically oriented approach to anatomy education. Acad Med. 2007; 82:475–8.

15. Yang YC, Jung WS, Lee JY, Lee JS, Cho BP, Choi JH, et al. Analysis of digital media and image delivery system of human anatomic dissection for medical students and clinicians. Korean J Phys Anthropol. 2009; 22:61–70. Korean.

16. Kim CW, Kim JH, Park KH, Kim DJ, Hahn JH, Lee YI, et al. Development and application of e-learning human anatomy content for undergraduate students in health allied science. Korean J Phys Anthropol. 2009; 22:47–59. Korean.

17. Chung WG, Kim EK, Choi EM, Jung JY, Kim NH, Jang SO, et al. A study on developmental direction of the dental hygiene discipline in Korea. Korean dental hygienists association, Korean association of dental hygiene professors. 2009. Korean.