Korean J Orthod.  2015 Sep;45(5):226-235. 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.226.

Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with Class III activator

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, Wonkwang University, Iksan, Korea. pigtail@wku.ac.kr
  • 2Private Practice, Iksan, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate short-term and long-term skeletodental outcomes of Class III activator treatment.
METHODS
A Class III activator treatment group (AG) comprised of 22 patients (9 boys, 13 girls) was compared with a Class III control group (CG) comprised of 17 patients (6 boys, 11 girls). The total treatment period was divided into three stages; the initial stage (T1), the post-activator treatment or post-mandibular growth peak stage (T2), and the long-term follow-up stage (T3). Cephalometric changes were evaluated statistically via the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Friedman test.
RESULTS
The AG exhibited significant increases in the SNA angle, ANB angle, Wits appraisal, A point-N perpendicular, Convexity of A point, and proclination of the maxillary incisors, from T1 to T2. In the long-term follow-up (T1-T3), the AG exhibited significantly greater increases in the ANB angle, Wits appraisal, and Convexity of A point than the CG.
CONCLUSIONS
Favorable skeletal outcomes induced during the Class III activator treatment period were generally maintained until the long-term follow-up period of the post-mandibular growth peak stage.

Keyword

Class III activator; Skeletodental changes

MeSH Terms

Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incisor
Retrospective Studies

Figure

  • Figure 1 Landmarks and reference planes. S, Sella; N, Nasion; Po, Porion; Or, Orbitale; Co, Condylion; Ar, Articulare; ANS, anterior nasal spine; PNS, posterior nasal spine; A, Point A; B, Point B; U1E, incisal edge of maxillary central incisor (U1); U1A, root apex of U1; L1E, incisal edge of mandibular incisor (L1); L1A, root apex of L1; Pog, Pogonion; Gn, Gnathion; Me, Menton; Go, Gonion; Sella-Nasion plane (SN plane), line from S to N; Frankfort horizontal plane (FH plane), line from Po to Or; Palatal plane, line from PNS to ANS; Functional occlusal plane, line drawn along the maximum intercuspation of the posterior teeth; N-perpendicular plane (N-perp plane), perpendicular line to FH plane passing through Nasion; Facial plane, line from N to Pog; Mandibular plane, line from Go to Me.

  • Figure 2 Cephalometric measurements. 1, SNA; 2, SNB; 3, ANB; 4, Palatal plane angle; 5, Mn. plane angle; 6, Gonial angle; 7, lower gonial angle; 8, AB to Mn. plane angle; 9, Y-axis angle; 10, ODI; 11, APDI; 12, U1 to SN; 13, U1 to FH; 14, IMPA; 15, Wits appraisal; 16, Mx. length; 17, Mn. length; 18, A-N perpend; 19, Pog-N perpend; 20, Convexity of A.


Cited by  1 articles

Treatment effects of mandibular total arch distalization using a ramal plate
Jonghan Yu, Jae Hyun Park, Mohamed Bayome, Sungkon Kim, Yoon-Ah Kook, Yoonji Kim, Chang-Hyen Kim
Korean J Orthod. 2016;46(4):212-219.    doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.4.212.


Reference

1. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby;1997.
2. Suhr CH, Nahm DS, Chang YI. Epidemiologic study of the prevalence of malocclusion in Korean. Korean J Orthod. 1984; 14:33–37.
3. Kang HK, Ryu YK. A study on the prevalence of malocclusion of Yonsei University students in 1991. Korean J Orthod. 1992; 22:691–701.
4. Miyajima K, McNamara JA Jr, Sana M, Murata S. An estimation of craniofacial growth in the untreated Class III female with anterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112:425–434. PMID: 9345155.
Article
5. Yang WS. The study on the orthodontic patients who visited Department of Orthodontics, Seoul National University Hospital during last 10 years (1985-1994). Korean J Orthod. 1995; 25:497–509.
6. Yu HS, Ryu YK, Lee JY. A study on the distributions and trends in malocclusion patients from department of orthodontics, college of dentistry, Yonsei university. Korean J Orthod. 1999; 29:267–276.
7. Hwang MS, Yoon YJ, Kim KW. An epidemiologic study on the orthodontic patients who visited Department of Orthodontics, Chosun University Dental Hospital last 10 years (1990-1999). Korean J Orthod. 2001; 31:283–300.
8. Son MH, Chang YI. Evaluation of various cephalometric measurements to predict the prognosis of early Class III malocclusion treatment. Korean J Orthod. 2004; 34:205–218.
9. Seehra J, Fleming PS, Mandall N, Dibiase AT. A comparison of two different techniques for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82:96–101. PMID: 21806467.
Article
10. Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 2012; 34:88–95. PMID: 21325335.
Article
11. Morales-Fernández M, Iglesias-Linares A, Yañez-Vico RM, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Solano-Reina E. Boneand dentoalveolar-anchored dentofacial orthopedics for Class III malocclusion: new approaches, similar objectives?: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2013; 83:540–552. PMID: 23621558.
12. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby;2013.
13. Esenlik E, Cahide A, Gayem EA, Yavuz F. Maxillary protraction using skeletal anchorage and intermaxillary elastics in Skeletal Class III patients. Korean J Orthod. 2015; 45:95–101. PMID: 25798416.
Article
14. Garattini G, Levrini L, Crozzoli P, Levrini A. Skeletal and dental modifications produced by the Bionator III appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114:40–44. PMID: 9674678.
Article
15. Arman A, Toygar TU, Abuhijleh E. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:733–740. PMID: 15673133.
16. Abdelnaby YL, Nassar EA. Chin cup effects using two different force magnitudes in the management of Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:957–962. PMID: 20578869.
Article
17. Liu ZP, Li CJ, Hu HK, Chen JW, Li F, Zou SJ. Efficacy of short-term chincup therapy for mandibular growth retardation in Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81:162–168. PMID: 20936970.
Article
18. Sugawara J, Aymach Z, Hin H, Nanda R. One-phase vs 2-phase treatment for developing Class III malocclusion: a comparison of identical twins. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141:e11–e22. PMID: 22196197.
Article
19. Souki BQ, Figueiredo DS, Lima IL, Oliveira DD, Miguel JA. Two-phase orthodontic treatment of a complex malocclusion: giving up efficiency in favor of effectiveness, quality of life, and functional rehabilitation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143:547–558. PMID: 23561417.
Article
20. Satravaha S, Taweesedt N. Stability of skeletal changes after activator treatment of patients with class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116:196–206. PMID: 10434094.
Article
21. Levin AS, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T, Fränkel C. Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:513–524. PMID: 18929269.
Article
22. Lim JH, Nahm DS, Yang WS, Suh CH. A case report of mandibular prognathism treated with activatior. Korean J Orthod. 1976; 6:79–82.
23. Chun YS. Clinical considerations on the effect of the Wunderer activator for correction of anterior cross bite. Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi. 1986; 24:1049–1060. PMID: 3474311.
24. Pak HS, Jung HS, Jung HM. Treatment of mandibular prognathism with activator; case report. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 1989; 16:125–131.
25. Pak CJ, Kim HJ, Nam SH. A comparison of the functional orthopedic appliances in the treatment of functonal anterior crossbite. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 1995; 22:111–127.
26. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11:119–129.
Article
27. Bruntz LQ, Palomo JM, Baden S, Hans MG. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130:340–348. PMID: 16979492.
Article
28. O'Reilly MT, Yanniello GJ. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae--a longitudinal cephalometric study. Angle Orthod. 1988; 58:179–184. PMID: 3164596.
29. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118:335–340. PMID: 10982936.
Article
30. Kuc-Michalska M, Baccetti T. Duration of the pubertal peak in skeletal Class I and Class III subjects. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:54–57. PMID: 19852640.
Article
31. Kim SJ, Kim KH, Yu HS, Baik HS. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145:317–324. PMID: 24582023.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJOD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr