Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2010 Dec;3(4):229-232. 10.3342/ceo.2010.3.4.229.

Transoral CO2 Laser Resection for Post-Radiation Arytenoid Edema

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University Graduate School, Busan, Korea.
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. kdlee@ns.kosinmed.or.kr

Abstract

Arytenoid edema following radiation therapy of laryngeal cancer may persist and make careful inspection and evaluation of the larynx difficult. Moreover, it may have serious impacts on functions such as breathing, swallowing, speech and voice. Conservative management such as antibiotics and steroid may be attempted but may be ineffective in progressive and severe cases of edema. We present four cases of persistent postradiation arytenoid edema successfully treated with partial resection of the arytenoid mucosa using transoral CO2 laser.

Keyword

CO2 Laser; Radiotherapy; Laryngeal edema; Arytenoid cartilage

MeSH Terms

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Arytenoid Cartilage
Deglutition
Edema
Laryngeal Edema
Laryngeal Neoplasms
Larynx
Lasers, Gas
Mucous Membrane
Respiration
Voice
Anti-Bacterial Agents

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Photograph obtained from laryngoscopy. Preoperative arytenoid edema (A) and widening of airway at postoperative 51 months (B) in case 1. Preoperative state (C) and postoperative 21 months (D) in case 2. Preoperative state (E) and postoperative 17 months (F) in case 3. Preoperative state (G) and postoperative 33 months (H) in case 4.

  • Fig. 2 (A) An illustration of CO2 laser resection line in arytenoid edema. (B) An illustration of the laser resection line in the arytenoid edema (sagittal view) and the mucosa grasped with a microlaryngeal cup forcep and separated from the arytenoid.


Reference

1. Ward PH, Calcaterra TC, Kagan AR. The enigma of post-radiation edema and recurrent or residual carcinoma of the larynx. Laryngoscope. 1975; 3. 85(3):522–529. PMID: 1121225.
Article
2. Patterson JM, Hildreth A, Wilson JA. Measuring edema in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007; 8. 116(8):559–564. PMID: 17847721.
Article
3. Ichimura K, Sugasawa M, Nibu K, Takasago E, Hasezawa K. The significance of arytenoid edema following radiotherapy of laryngeal carcinoma with respect to residual and recurrent tumour. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1997; 10. 24(4):391–397. PMID: 9352832.
Article
4. Fu KK, Woodhouse RJ, Quivey JM, Phillips TL, Dedo HH. The significance of laryngeal edema following radiotherapy of carcinoma of the vocal cord. Cancer. 1982; 2. 15. 49(4):655–658. PMID: 7055780.
Article
5. Lim RY. Laser arytenoidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985; 4. 111(4):262–263. PMID: 3977757.
Article
6. Wani MK, Yarber R, Hengesteg A, Rosen C, Woodson GE. Endoscopic laser medial arytenoidectomy versus total arytenoidectomy in the management of bilateral vocal fold paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996; 11. 105(11):857–862. PMID: 8916859.
Article
7. Crumley RL. Endoscopic laser medial arytenoidectomy for airway management in bilateral laryngeal paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993; 2. 102(2):81–84. PMID: 8427504.
Article
8. Bahadur S, Amatya RC, Kacker SK. The enigma of post-radiation oedema and residual or recurrent carcinoma of the larynx and pyriform fossa. J Laryngol Otol. 1985; 8. 99(8):763–765. PMID: 4020272.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CEO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr