Clin Endosc.  2013 May;46(3):284-287. 10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.284.

Gastric Schwannoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Trucut Biopsy

Affiliations
  • 1Institute for Digestive Research, Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jokim@schmc.ac.kr

Abstract

Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are rare subepithelial tumors comprising approximately 3.3% to 12.8% of all mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. On endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) they are seen as hypoechoic tumors arising most commonly from the 4th proper muscle layer. Although EUS helps to distinguish tumor characteristics, tissue sampling is required for differentiation with other more common tumors such as GI stromal tumors. Both EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and EUS-guided trucut biopsy (EUS-TCB) can be used for tissue sampling. However, only EUS-TCB allows core biopsy and a high yield of immunohistochemical staining. We report a case of a gastric schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-TCB.

Keyword

Gastric schwannoma; Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided trucut biopsy

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Gastrointestinal Tract
Muscles
Neurilemmoma

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Gastroscopy shows a submucosal elevated lesion with bridging fold. (B) Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) shows a 4 cm-sized hypoehoic mass with internal hyperechogenicity originating from the proper muscle layer. (C) Contrast enhanced computed tomography scan shows a round, enhancing extraluminal-growing mass. (D) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy with 19 gauze needle was performed.

  • Fig. 2 Pathologic findings of Trucut biopsy. Tissue was composed of broad bundles of elongated cells (A, H&E stain, ×100). Immunohistochemistry (IHCS) findings; (B) the tumor strongly stains for S-100 (arrow). IHCS staining for (C) CD 117, (D) CD 34, (E) smooth muscle actin, and (F) desmin are negative (H&E stain, ×100).

  • Fig. 3 Gross specimen of the tumor. The resected specimen shows an unencapsulated homogenous tumor. A Trucut biopsy induced scar (arrow) can be seen.


Reference

1. Sarlomo-Rikala M, Miettinen M. Gastric schwannoma: a clinicopathological analysis of six cases. Histopathology. 1995; 27:355–360. PMID: 8847066.
2. Daimaru Y, Kido H, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Benign schwannoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol. 1988; 19:257–264. PMID: 3126126.
Article
3. Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009; 23:743–759. PMID: 19744637.
4. Logrono R, Jones DV, Faruqi S, Bhutani MS. Recent advances in cell biology, diagnosis, and therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer Biol Ther. 2004; 3:251–258. PMID: 14726714.
5. Hwang JH, Kimmey MB. The incidental upper gastrointestinal subepithelial mass. Gastroenterology. 2004; 126:301–307. PMID: 14699508.
Article
6. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier C, Cuillerier E, Roseau G, Barbier JP. Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut. 2000; 46:88–92. PMID: 10601061.
Article
7. Ji F, Wang ZW, Wang LJ, Ning JW, Xu GQ. Clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors and diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008; 23(8 Pt 2):e318–e324. PMID: 18505417.
Article
8. Stelow EB, Stanley MW, Mallery S, Lai R, Linzie BM, Bardales RH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration findings of gastrointestinal leiomyomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 119:703–708. PMID: 12760289.
Article
9. Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y, et al. The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55:37–43. PMID: 11756912.
Article
10. Fernández-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Solé M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:292–299. PMID: 20354939.
Article
11. Pakseresht K, Reddymasu SC, Oropeza-Vail MM, Fan F, Olyaee M. Mediastinal schwannoma diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011; 5:411–415. PMID: 21829397.
Article
12. Kudo T, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, et al. Three cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma diagnosed by EUS-FNA. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17:3459–3464. PMID: 21876639.
Article
13. Kwon MS, Lee SS, Ahn GH. Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal tract: clinicopathological features of 12 cases including a case of esophageal tumor compared with those of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Pathol Res Pract. 2002; 198:605–613. PMID: 12440783.
Article
14. Miettinen M, Shekitka KM, Sobin LH. Schwannomas in the colon and rectum: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 20 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001; 25:846–855. PMID: 11420455.
15. Prévot S, Bienvenu L, Vaillant JC, de Saint-Maur PP. Benign schwannoma of the digestive tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of five cases, including a case of esophageal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999; 23:431–436. PMID: 10199472.
16. Turner MS, Goldsmith JD. Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: spindle cell neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009; 133:1370–1374. PMID: 19722741.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr