Chonnam Med J.  2012 Dec;48(3):164-168. 10.4068/cmj.2012.48.3.164.

Clinical Significance of Subjective Foamy Urine

• Kang KK
• Choi JR
• Song JY
• Han SW
• Park SH
• Yoo WS
• Kim HW
• Lee D
• Moon KH
• Lee MH
• Kim B

• KMID: 2048806
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2012.48.3.164

Abstract

Foamy urine is widely regarded as a sign of proteinuria. However, there is no objective definition of foamy urine and there are no reports on the proportion of involved patients who have overt proteinuria or microalbuminuria. We performed this study to investigate this proportion and to identify possible risk factors for these two conditions. We reviewed all new outpatients from 1 November 2011 to 30 April 2012 and identified patients complaining of foamy urine. Their demographic data and medical records were examined. In particular, we tabulated the patients' spot urinary protein to creatinine ratio, spot urinary microalbumin to creatinine ratio (ACR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum levels of creatinine (Cr), uric acid, calcium, phosphate, and glucose. In addition, we calculated estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) by using the CKD-EPI equation. We also performed risk factor analysis with the Chi-squared test and by logistic regression. Seventy-two patients (6.3% of total new outpatients) complained of foamy urine; of these, there were 59 males with a median age of 65.5 years (range, 36-87 years). Of the 72 patients, 16 (22.2%) had overt proteinuria. We found that diabetes, poor renal function (high Cr, BUN, low eGFR), increased serum phosphate, and increased serum glucose were associated with overt proteinuria. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that serum Cr and serum phosphate were associated with overt proteinuria. The ACR was available for 38 patients, and in this subgroup, 12 (31.6%) showed microalbuminuria or overt proteinuria. In this subgroup, a high serum Cr was the only statistically significant risk factor. Among patients who complained of foamy urine, approximately 20% had overt proteinuria, and increased serum Cr and phosphate were statistically significant risk factors.

Keyword

Proteinuria; Creatinine; Phosphates

MeSH Terms

Blood Urea Nitrogen
Calcium
Creatinine
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Glucose
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Medical Records
Outpatients
Phosphates
Proteinuria
Risk Factors
Uric Acid
Calcium
Creatinine
Glucose
Phosphates
Uric Acid

Reference

1. Emmett M, Fenves AZ, Schwartz JC. Taal MW, Chertow GM, Marsden PA, Skorecki K, Yu ASL, Brenner BM, editors. Approach to the patient with kidney disease. Brenner and Rector's The Kidney. 2011. 9th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;844–866.

2. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009. 150:604–612.

3. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002. 39:2 Suppl 1. S1–266.

4. Lee SY, Kwak DW. Clinical significance of foamy urine. J Pusan National University Hospital. 2009. 26:357–363.

5. Yap YS, Chi WC, Lin CH, Wu YW, Liu YC. Hyperphosphatemia is associated with overt proteinuria in non-diabetic patients with late-stage chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. [Epub ahead of print].