Korean J Leg Med.  2015 Nov;39(4):93-98. 10.7580/kjlm.2015.39.4.93.

Genetic Testing for Additional Evidence during Investigations: Focus in Ethics

• Lee JH
• Lee HY
• Jung KW
• Lee SD

• KMID: 2130852
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.7580/kjlm.2015.39.4.93

Abstract

Since the introduction of genetic fingerprinting 30 years ago, there has been considerable development in the field of forensic genetics. A cautious approach is emphasized when using human genetic evidence in order to protect individual rights and because of its distinctiveness. Nevertheless, conventional ethical guidelines may no longer be suitable for handling information derived from genetic material. Moreover, projected innovations to maximize such systems' usage have raised previously debated ethical concerns. Recent and on-going research on the use of genetic evidence obtained from crime scenes to estimate physical appearance, ancestry, and/or personal traits is expected to provide additional investigative resources, especially for cases involving unknown identity. Given the special nature of genetic components, ethical issues need to be seriously considered and addressed when conducting research involving human genetic material. However, such ethical parameters may shift with scientific advancements. Moreover, because ethics reflects social consensus, various perspectives must be obtained and discussed. This paper introduces multiple perspectives on using genetic material as additional evidence for police investigations and indicates scope for the discussion of prospective ethical concerns.

Keyword

DNA fingerprinting; Identification; Investigative techniques; Phenotype; Ethics

MeSH Terms

Consensus
Crime
DNA Fingerprinting
Ethics*
Forensic Genetics
Genetic Testing*
Human Rights
Humans
Investigative Techniques
Phenotype
Police
Prospective Studies

Reference

1. Butler JM. Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: methodology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press;2011.

2. Corte-Real F. Forensic DNA databases. Forensic Sci Int. 2004; 146(Suppl):S143–4.

3. Werrett DJ. The national DNA database. Forensic Sci Int. 1997; 88:33–42.

4. Hoyle R. Forensics. The FBI's national DNA database. Nat Biotechnol. 1998; 16:987.

5. Schneider PM, Martin PD. Criminal DNA databases: the European situation. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 119:232–8.

6. Martin PD, Schmitter H, Schneider PM. A brief history of the formation of DNA databases in forensic science within Europe. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 119:225–31.

7. Wallace H. The UK National DNA Database. Balancing crime detection, human rights and privacy. EMBO Rep. 2006; 7 Spec No:S26–30.

8. Harbison SA, Hamilton JF, Walsh SJ. The New Zealand D-NA databank: its development and significance as a crime solving tool. Sci Justice. 2001; 41:33–7.

9. Wilson DB, McClure D, Weisburd D. Does forensic DNA help to solve crime? The benefit of sophisticated answers to naive questions. J Contemp Crim Justice. 2010; 26:458–69.

10. Korean Speaking Working Group of ISFG, Seo SB, Lee SH, et al. DNA database searching using genetic relationship. Korean J Leg Med. 2011; 35:92–7.

11. Pascali VL, Lago G, Dobosz M. The dark side of the UK National DNA Database. Lancet. 2003; 362:834.

12. Wallace HM, Jackson AR, Gruber J, et al. Forensic DNA databases: ethical and legal standards: a global review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2014; 4:57–63.

13. Guillen M, Lareu MV, Pestoni C, et al. Ethical-legal problems of DNA databases in criminal investigation. J Med Ethics. 2000; 26:266–71.

14. Kayser M, Schneider PM. DNA-based prediction of human externally visible characteristics in forensics: motivations, scientific challenges, and ethical considerations. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009; 3:154–61.

15. Liu F, Hendriks AE, Ralf A, et al. Common DNA variants predict tall stature in Europeans. Hum Genet. 2014; 133:587–97.

16. Wolinsky H. CSI on steroids: DNA-based phenotyping is helping police derive visual information from crime scene samples to aid in the hunt for suspects. EMBO Rep. 2015; 16:782–6.

17. Worland J. Hong Kong anti-littering campaign uses DNA from trash to shame people. Time Magazine [Internet]. 2015. May 20 [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from:. http://time.com/3890499/hong-kong-littering-campaign/?x-id=emailshare.

18. Kayser M. Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigation purposes. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015; 18:33–48.

19. Kaye J. The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17:R180–3.

20. Thomas MG, Parfitt T, Weiss DA, et al. Y chromosomes traveling south: the cohen modal haplotype and the origins of the Lemba–the “Black Jews of Southern Africa”. Am J Hum Genet. 2000; 66:674–86.

21. Zeilinger S, Kuhnel B, Klopp N, et al. Tobacco smoking leads to extensive genomewide changes in DNA methylation. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e63812.

22. Koops BJ, Schellekens M. Forensic DNA phenotyping: regulatory issues. Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev. 2008; 9:158–60.

23. Liu F, van der Lijn F, Schurmann C, et al. A genomewide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans. PLoS Genet. 2012; 8:e1002932.

24. Boehringer S, van der Lijn F, Liu F, et al. Genetic determination of human facial morphology: links between cleft-lips and normal variation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19:1192–7.

25. Constitutional Court Korea. 2011Hun-Ma28 (Aug. 28, 2014).

26. Toom V. Forensic DNA databases in England and the Netherlands: governance, structure and performance compared. New Genet Soc. 2012; 31:311–22.

27. Stevens AP. Arresting crime: expanding the scope of DNA databases in America. Tex Law Rev. 2001; 79:921.

28. BIOETHICS and SAFETY ACT, Act No. 12844 (Nov. 19, 2014).