J Korean Acad Conserv Dent.  2006 Jul;31(4):263-268. 10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.263.

Influence of additional etching on shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive system to enamel

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. skykim@knu.ac.kr

Abstract

Recently, self-etching adhesive system has been introduced to simplify the clinical bonding procedures. It is less acidic compared to the phosphoric acid, thus there is doubt whether this system has enough bond strength to enamel. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of additional etching on the adhesion of resin composite to enamel. Ninety extracted bovine permanent anterior teeth were used. The labial surfaces of the crown were ground with 600-grit abrasive paper under wet condition. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups of 15 teeth each. Clearfil SE Bond(R), Adper(TM) Prompt L-Pop and Tyrian SPE(TM) were used as self-etching primers. Each self-etching primers were applied in both enamel specimens with and without additional etching. For additional etching groups, enamel surface was pretreated with 32% phosphoric acid (UNI-ETCH, Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA). Hybrid resin composite Clearfil AP-X, (Kuraray Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) was packed into the mold and light-cured for 40 seconds. Twenty-four hours after storage, the specimens were tested in shear bond strength. The data for each group were subjected to independent t - test at p < 0.01 to make comparisons among the groups. In Clearfil SE Bond(R), shear bond strength of additional etching group was higher than no additional etching group (p < 0.01). In Adper(TM) Prompt L-Pop and Tyrian SPE, there were no significant difference between additional etching and non-etching groups (p > 0.01). In conclusion, self-etching adhesive system with weak acid seems to have higher bond strength to enamel with additional etching, while self-etching adhesive system with strong acid seems not.

Keyword

Self-etching adhesive; Phosphoric acid etching; Shear bond strength; Enamel

MeSH Terms

Adhesives*
Crowns
Dental Enamel*
Fungi
Tooth
Adhesives

Cited by  1 articles

Microtensile bond strength of silorane-based composite specific adhesive system using different bonding strategies
Laura Alves Bastos, Ana Beatriz Silva Sousa, Brahim Drubi-Filho, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
Restor Dent Endod. 2015;40(1):23-29.    doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.1.23.


Reference

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955. 34:849–853.
Article
2. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol. 1967. 12:1615–1620.
3. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol. 1968. 13:61–70.
Article
4. Uno S, Finger WJ. Phosphoric aid as a conditioning agent in the Gluma bonding system. Am J Dent. 1995. 8:236–241.
5. Triolo PT Jr, Swift EJ, Mudgil A, Levine A. Effect of etching time on enamel bond strengths. Am J Dent. 1993. 6:302–304.
6. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LAF, Sinhoreti MAC. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent. 1999. 12:181–184.
7. Itou K, Torii Y, Takimura T, Chikami K, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of priming time on tensile bond strength to bovine teeth and morphologic structure of interfaces created by self-etching primers. Int J Prosthodont. 2001. 14:225–230.
8. Kang IJ, Park JW. Priming time and etching effect on shear bond strength of self-etching adhesive. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29:185–190.
Article
9. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent. 2001. Suppl 6. 119–144.
10. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I. Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:296–308.
11. Finger WJ, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one-component enamel/dentin bonding agent. Am J Dent. 1996. 9:206–210.
12. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent. 2002. 27:403–409.
13. Gwinnett AJ, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. Am J Dent. 1992. 5:237–239.
14. Swift EJ Jr, Cloe BC. Shear bond strengths of new enamel etchant. Am J Dent. 1993. 6:162–164.
15. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT. Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent. 1995. 8:289–293.
16. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching system. Part II. Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001. 17:430–444.
17. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Suzuki K. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004. 83:454–458.
Article
18. Yamada T, Sugizaki J. Basic properties and clinical applications of the Clearfil SE Bond. Proceedings of the International Kurary Symposium Osaka. 2000. 1–6.
19. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982. 16:265–273.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKACD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr