Imaging Sci Dent.  2013 Jun;43(2):99-104. 10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.99.

Clinical usefulness of teleradiology in general dental practice

• Choi JW

• KMID: 1974436
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.99

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was performed to investigate the clinical usefulness of teleradiology in general dental practice.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two hundred and seventy five cases were submitted for inquiry to the case presentation board of the website of The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology for a 5 year periods. The diagnosis results of those cases were analyzed according to the disease classification, the correlation with the patient's chief complaint, the necessity of additional examinations or treatments, the image modalities, and the number of dentists inquiring.
RESULTS
Differential diagnoses of normal anatomic structures were the most frequently submitted cases, covering 15.6% of all cases. Among 275 cases, 164 cases required no additional treatments or examinations. Panoramic radiographs were the most frequently submitted images, accounting for 248 inquiries. The 275 cases were submitted by 96 dentists. Fifty-two dentists wrote one inquiry, and 44 inquired 2 or more times. The average inquiry number of the latter group was 5.0 cases.
CONCLUSION
A teleradiology system in general dental practice could be helpful in the differential diagnosis of common lesions and reduce unnecessary costs.

Keyword

Teleradiology; General Practice, Dental

MeSH Terms

Accounting
Dentists
Diagnosis, Differential
General Practice, Dental
Humans
Teleradiology

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Classification according to the association with the chief complaint (CC) of patients and the requirement for additional treatment.

Reference

1. Farman AG. Image communication: mailed, wired, and wireless. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007. 103:585–586.

2. Park W, Lee HN, Jeong JS, Kwon JH, Lee GH, Kim KD. Optimal protocol for teleconsultation with a cellular phone for dentoalveolar trauma: an in-vitro study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2012. 42:71–75.

3. LaBounty TM, Kim RJ, Lin FY, Budoff MJ, Weinsaft JW, Min JK. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010. 3:482–490.

4. Aziz SR, Ziccardi VB. Telemedicine using smartphones for oral and maxillofacial surgery consultation, communication, and treatment planning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. 67:2505–2509.

5. Roccia F, Spada MC, Milani B, Berrone S. Telemedicine in maxillofacial trauma: a 2-year clinical experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005. 63:1101–1105.

6. Salazar-Fernandez CI, Herce J, Garcia-Palma A, Delgado J, Martín JF, Soto T. Telemedicine as an effective tool for the management of temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012. 70:295–301.

7. Rollert MK, Strauss RA, Abubaker AO, Hampton C. Telemedicine consultations in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999. 57:136–138.

8. Brownrigg P, Lowry JC, Edmondson MJ, Langton SG. Telemedicine in oral surgery and maxillofacial trauma: a descriptive account. Telemed J E Health. 2004. 10:27–31.

9. Choi JW. Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011. 41:1–6.

10. American Dental Association, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The selection of patients for dental radiographic examinations [Internet]. 2004. cited 2012 Oct 20. Silver Spring: American Dental Association;Available from: https://www.ada.org/sections/advocacy/pdfs/topics_radiography_examinations(2).pdf.

11. Jacobs MJ, Edmondson MJ, Lowry JC. Accuracy of diagnosis of fractures by maxillofacial and accident and emergency doctors using plain radiography compared with a telemedicine system: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002. 40:156–162.

12. Mistak EJ, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, West LA, Runyan DA. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images. J Endod. 1998. 24:262–266.

13. Baker WP, Loushine RJ, West LA, Kudryk LV, Zadinsky JR. Interpretation of artificial and in vivo periapical bone lesions comparing conventional viewing versus a video conferencing system. J Endod. 2000. 26:39–41.

14. Torres-Pereira C, Possebon RS, Simões A, Bortoluzzi MC, Leão JC, Giovanini AF, et al. Email for distance diagnosis of oral diseases: a preliminary study of teledentistry. J Telemed Telecare. 2008. 14:435–438.

15. Agrawal A, Agrawal A, Pandit M, Kalyanpur A. Systematic survey of discrepancy rates in an international teleradiology service. Emerg Radiol. 2011. 18:23–29.