Imaging Sci Dent.  2013 Jun;43(2):63-69. 10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.63.

Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China. kqgang@bjmu.edu.cn

Abstract

After over one decade development, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been widely accepted for clinical application in almost every field of dentistry. Meanwhile, the radiation dose of CBCT to patient has also caused broad concern. According to the literature, the effective radiation doses of CBCTs in nowadays market fall into a considerably wide range that is from 19 microSv to 1073 microSv and closely related to the imaging detector, field of view, and voxel sizes used for scanning. To deeply understand the potential risk from CBCT, this report also reviewed the effective doses from literatures on intra-oral radiograph, panoramic radiograph, lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph, multi-slice CT, and so on. The protection effect of thyroid collar and leaded glasses were also reviewed.

Keyword

Radiation Dosage; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Tomography, Spiral Computed; Radiation Protection

MeSH Terms

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Dentistry
Eyeglasses
Glass
Humans
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Protection
Thyroid Gland
Tomography, Spiral Computed

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The image of one anthropomorphic phantom.

  • Fig. 2 The example image of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).


Cited by  4 articles

Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: A review
Rafael Henrique Nunes Rondon, Yamba Carla Lara Pereira, Glauce Crivelaro do Nascimento
Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(1):1-6.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.1.

Radiographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus prior to dental implant therapy: A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic imaging
Aditya Tadinada, Karen Fung, Sejal Thacker, Mina Mahdian, Aniket Jadhav, Gian Pietro Schincaglia
Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45(3):169-174.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.169.

Comparison of 2 root surface area measurement methods: 3-dimensional laser scanning and cone-beam computed tomography
Jintana Tasanapanont, Janya Apisariyakul, Tanapan Wattanachai, Patiyut Sriwilas, Marit Midtbø, Dhirawat Jotikasthira
Imaging Sci Dent. 2017;47(2):117-122.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2017.47.2.117.

Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scans with high- and low-resolution modes for the detection of root perforations
Abbas Shokri, Amir Eskandarloo, Marouf Norouzi, Jalal Poorolajal, Gelareh Majidi, Alireza Aliyaly
Imaging Sci Dent. 2018;48(1):11-19.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.1.11.


Reference

1. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003. 32:229–234.
Article
2. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004. 33:83–86.
Article
3. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol. 2005. 56:413–417.
Article
4. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006. 35:219–226.
Article
5. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. 106:106–114.
Article
6. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008. 105:773–782.
Article
7. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Grondahl K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008. 37:72–79.
Article
8. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008. 37:268–273.
Article
9. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009. 38:367–378.
Article
10. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009. 107:559–565.
Article
11. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol. 2009. 82:35–40.
Article
12. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009. 71:461–468.
Article
13. Qu XM, Li G, Ludlow JB, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010. 110:770–776.
Article
14. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012. 81:267–271.
Article
15. Thilander-Klang A, Helmrot E. Methods of determining the effective in dental radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010. 139:306–309.
16. Davies J, Johnson B, Drage NA. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012. 41:30–36.
Article
17. Grünheid T, Kolbeck Schieck JR, Pliska BT, Ahmad M, Larson BE. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012. 141:436–443.
Article
18. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. 133:640.e1–640.e5.
Article
19. SEDENTEXCT Guideline Development Panel. Radiation protection No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. 2012. Luxembourg: European Comminssion Directorate-General for Energy.
20. Danforth RA, Clark DE. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000. 89:236–243.
Article
21. Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Sanderink G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005. 34:145–149.
Article
22. Gavala S, Donta C, Tsiklakis K, Boziari A, Kamenopoulou V, Stamatakis HC. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol. 2009. 71:42–48.
Article
23. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008. 139:1237–1243.
24. Visser H, Rödig T, Hermann KP. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthod. 2001. 71:159–163.
25. Gijbels F, Sanderink G, Wyatt J, Van Dam J, Nowak B, Jacobs R. Radiation doses of indirect and direct digital cephalometric radiography. Br Dent J. 2004. 197:149–152.
Article
26. Gibbs SJ. Effective dose equivalent and effective dose: comparison for common projections in oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000. 90:538–545.
Article
27. Qu XM, Li G, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Comparative dosimetry of dental cone-beam computed tomography and multi-slice computed tomography for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011. 46:595–599.
28. Qu XM, Li G, Sanderink GC, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Dose reduction of cone beam CT scanning for the entire oral and maxillofacial regions with thyroid collars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012. 41:373–378.
Article
29. Qu X, Li G, Zhang Z, Ma X. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions. Eur J Radiol. 2012. 81:e376–e380.
Article
30. Prins R, Dauer LT, Colosi DC, Quinn B, Kleiman NJ, Bohle GC, et al. Significant reduction in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) eye dose through the use of leaded glasses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011. 112:502–507.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr