Imaging Sci Dent.  2011 Mar;41(1):1-6. 10.5624/isd.2011.41.1.1.

Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. runnachv@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this review is to evaluate the possibility of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This report was carried out by review of the literatures.
RESULTS
Panoramic radiography has sufficient diagnostic accuracy in dental caries, periodontal diseases, and other lesions. Also, the effective dose of panoramic radiography is lower than traditional full-mouth periapical radiography.
CONCLUSION
Panoramic radiography will improve the efficacy of dental examination in national oral examination. However, more studies are required to evaluate the benefit, financial cost, and operation time and also to make selection criteria and quality management program.

Keyword

Radiography, Panoramic; Mass Screening; Outcome and Process Assessment; Radiation Dosage

MeSH Terms

Dental Caries
Diagnosis, Oral
Mass Screening
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Patient Selection
Periodontal Diseases
Radiation Dosage
Radiography, Panoramic

Cited by  4 articles

Odontoma: a retrospective study of 73 cases
Seo-Young An, Chang-Hyeon An, Karp-Shik Choi
Imaging Sci Dent. 2012;42(2):77-81.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.2.77.

Clinical usefulness of teleradiology in general dental practice
Jin-Woo Choi
Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(2):99-104.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.99.

The relationship between radiological features and clinical manifestation and dental expenses of keratocystic odontogenic tumor
Jung-Hyun Min, Kyung-Hoe Huh, Min-Suk Heo, Soon-Chul Choi, Won-Jin Yi, Sam-Sun Lee, Kwang-Hak Bae, Jin-Woo Choi
Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(2):91-98.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2013.43.2.91.

Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study
Öznur Özalp, Hüseyin Alican Tezerişener, Burak Kocabalkan, Ulviye Şebnem Büyükkaplan, Mehmet Mustafa Özarslan, Göksel Şimşek Kaya, Mehmet Ali Altay, Alper Sindel
Imaging Sci Dent. 2018;48(4):269-275.    doi: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.269.


Reference

1. Jung SH, Jin BH, Bae KH, Lee BJ, Han DH. Strategies and educational manuals to improve national oral examination program. 2009. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;25–76.
2. Shin MJ, Choi BR, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, et al. Usefulness of panoramic radiograph for the improvement of periodic oral examination. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2010. 40:25–32.
3. Park TW, Lee SR, Kim JD, Park CS, Choi SC, Koh KJ, et al. Oral and maxillofacial radiology. 2001. 3rd ed. Seoul: Narae Publishing Inc;138–145.
4. White SC, Weissman DD. Relative discernment of lesions by intraoral and panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977. 95:1117–1121.
Article
5. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Aspects of panoramic radiography in general dental practice. Br Dent J. 1999. 186:342–344.
Article
6. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Routine panoramic radiography of new adult patients in general dental practice: relevance of diagnostic yield to treatment and identification of radiographic selection criteria. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002. 93:488–495.
Article
7. Kidd EA, Pitts NB. A reappraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior approximal caries. Br Dent J. 1990. 169:195–200.
Article
8. Muhammed AH, Manson-Hing LR, Ala B. A comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiographic surveys in evaluating a dental clinic population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982. 54:108–117.
Article
9. Galal A, Manson-Hing L, Jamison H. A comparison of combinations of clinical and radiographic examinations in evaluation of a dental clinic population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985. 60:553–561.
Article
10. Hurlburt CE, Wuehrmann AH. Comparison of interproximal carious lesion detection in panoramic and standard intraoral radiography. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976. 93:1154–1158.
Article
11. Douglass CW, Valachovic RW, Wijesinha A, Chauncey HH, Kapur KK, McNeil BJ. Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986. 62:330–339.
Article
12. Oba T, Katayama H. Comparison of orthopantomography with conventional periapical dental radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972. 34:524–530.
13. Stewart JL, Bieser LF. Panoramic roentgenograms compared with conventional intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968. 26:39–42.
Article
14. Choi HM. Comparison of the clinical examination with the panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of dental caries. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 1999. 29:275–282.
15. An SY, An CH, Choi KS. Efficacy of panoramic radiography as a screening procedure in dental examination compared with clinical evaluation. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2007. 37:83–86.
16. Hirschmann PN. Radiographic interpretation of chronic periodontitis. Int Dent J. 1987. 37:3–9.
17. Meister F Jr, Simpson J, Davies EE. Oral health of airmen: analysis of panoramic radiographic and Polaroid photographic survey. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977. 94:335–339.
Article
18. Lee JS, Kang BC. Screening panoramic radiographs in a group of patients visiting a Health Promotion Center. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol. 2005. 35:199–202.
19. Morris CR, Marano PD, Swimley DC, Runco JG. Abnormalities noted on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969. 28:772–782.
Article
20. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Screening panoramic radiology of adults in general dental practice: radiological findings. Br Dent J. 2001. 190:495–501.
Article
21. El-Gehani R, Orafi M, Elarbi M, Subhashraj K. Benign tumours of orofacial region at Benghazi, Libya: a study of 405 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009. 37:370–375.
Article
22. Zeichner SJ, Ruttimann UE, Webber RL. Dental radiography: efficacy in the assessment of intraosseous lesions of the face and jaws in asymptomatic patients. Radiology. 1987. 162:691–695.
Article
23. Stephens RG, Kogon SL, Speechley MR, Dunn WJ. A critical view of the rationale for routine, initial and periodic radiographic surveys. J Can Dent Assoc. 1992. 58:825–837.
24. Daley TD, Wysocki GP, Pringle GA. Relative incidence of odontogenic tumors and oral and jaw cysts in a Canadian population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1994. 77:276–280.
Article
25. Buchner A, Merrell PW, Carpenter WM. Relative frequency of central odontogenic tumors: a study of 1,088 cases from Northern California and comparison to studies from other parts of the world. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006. 64:1343–1352.
Article
26. Regezi JA, Kerr DA, Courtney RM. Odontogenic tumors: analysis of 706 cases. J Oral Surg. 1978. 36:771–778.
27. Ahlqwist M, Halling A, Hollender L. Rotational panoramic radiography in epidemiological studies of dental health. Comparison between panoramic radiographs and intraoral full mouth surveys. Swed Dent J. 1986. 10:73–84.
28. Jenkins WM, Mason WN. Radiographic assessment of periodontitis. A study of 800 unreferred patients. Br Dent J. 1984. 156:170–174.
Article
29. Langland OE, Langlais RP, Morris CR, Preece JW. Panoramic radiographic survey of dentists participating in ADA health screening programs: 1976, 1977, and 1978. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980. 101:279–282.
Article
30. Chaffin JG, Hennessy BJ, Cripps KA. Validity of using a panoramic radiograph for initial dental classification of Army recruits. Mil Med. 2004. 169:368–372.
Article
31. White SC, Forsythe AB, Joseph LP. Patient-selection criteria for panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984. 57:681–690.
Article
32. Rushton VE, Horner K. The use of panoramic radiology in dental practice. J Dent. 1996. 24:185–201.
Article
33. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Screening panoramic radiography of new adult patients: diagnostic yield when combined with bitewing radiography and identification of selection criteria. Br Dent J. 2002. 192:275–279.
Article
34. Martínez Beneyto Y, Alcaráz Banos M, Pérez Lajarin L, Rushton VE. Clinical justification of dental radiology in adult patients: a review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007. 12:E244–E251.
35. Matteson SR, Joseph LP, Bottomley W, Finger HW, Frommer HH, Koch RW, et al. The report of the panel to develop radiographic selection criteria for dental patients. Gen Dent. 1991. 39:264–270.
36. Douglas CW, Valachovic RW, Berkey CS, Chauncey HH, McNeil BJ. Clinical indicators of radiographically detectable dental diseases in the adult patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988. 65:474–482.
37. Barrett AP, Waters BE, Griffiths CJ. A critical evaluation of panoramic radiography as a screening procedure in dental practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984. 57:673–677.
Article
38. Kim JB. 2006 National Oral Health Survey. 2007. cited 2010 Nov 30. Ministry of Health and Welfare;available from http://oralhealth.hp.go.kr/survey/survey_2.aspx.
39. Lang NP, Hill RW. Radiographs in periodontics. J Clin Periodontol. 1977. 4:16–28.
40. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008. 139:1237–1243.
41. Diederich S, Lenzen H. Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques. Cancer. 2000. 89:2457–2460.
42. Oginni FO. Tooth loss in a sub-urban Nigerian population: causes and pattern of mortality revisited. Int Dent J. 2005. 55:17–23.
Article
43. Jaafar N, Razak IA, Nor GM. Trends in tooth loss due to caries and periodontal disease by tooth type. Singapore Dent J. 1989. 14:39–41.
44. Baehni PC, Guggenheim B. Potential of diagnostic microbiology for treatment and prognosis of dental caries and periodontal diseases. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1996. 7:259–277.
Article
45. Trachtenberg F, Maserejian NN, Tavares M, Soncini JA, Hayes C. Extent of tooth decay in the mouth and increased need for replacement of dental restorations: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2008. 30:388–392.
46. Leininger M, Tenenbaum H, Davideau JL. Modified periodontal risk assessment score: long-term predictive value of treatment outcomes. A retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 2010. 37:427–435.
Article
47. Ong G. Periodontal disease and tooth loss. Int Dent J. 1998. 48:233–238.
Article
48. Lorentz TC, Cota LO, Cortelli JR, Vargas AM, Costa FO. Tooth loss in individuals under periodontal maintenance therapy: prospective study. Braz Oral Res. 2010. 24:231–237.
Article
49. Dannewitz B, Krieger JK, Hüsing J, Eickholz P. Loss of molars in periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis five years or more after active periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol. 2006. 33:53–61.
Article
50. Matuliene G, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Schmidlin K, Brägger U, Zwahlen M, et al. Influence of residual pockets on progression of periodontitis and tooth loss: results after 11 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol. 2008. 35:685–695.
Article
51. Muzzi L, Nieri M, Cattabriga M, Rotundo R, Cairo F, Pini Prato GP. The potential prognostic value of some periodontal factors for tooth loss: a retrospective multilevel analysis on periodontal patients treated and maintained over 10 years. J Periodontol. 2006. 77:2084–2089.
Article
52. Pippi R. Benign odontogenic tumours: clinical, epidemiological and therapeutic aspects of a sixteen years sample. Minerva Stomatol. 2006. 55:503–513.
53. Nuñez-Urrutia S, Figueiredo R, Gay-Escoda C. Retrospective clinicopathological study of 418 odontogenic cysts. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010. 15:e767–e773.
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr