Cancer Res Treat.  2008 Dec;40(4):184-189.

A Matched-cohort Comparison of Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation using Ultra-thin Cryoprobes with Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Cell Carcinoma

• Ko YH
• Park HS
• Moon DG
• Lee JG
• Kim JJ
• Yoon DK
• Kang SH
• Cheon J

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of performing laparoscopic renal cryoablation (LRC) for the treatment of RCC, as compared with open partial nephrectomy (OPN), which is the established NSS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
From April 2004, among the patients who underwent LRC with a 1.47 mm cryoprobe, we enrolled 20 patients who were pathologically confirmed as having RCC with a tumor size smaller than 4 cm. These patients were matched with a group of 20 patients, who were selected based on the pre-operative characteristics of the tumor and those of the patients, from a pre-existing database of the patients who underwent OPN during the same period.
RESULTS
The mean age and tumor size were 56.3+/-11.5 years and 2.4+/-1.7 cm in the LRC group, and 57.6+/-10.9 years and 2.2+/-1.1 cm in the OPN group. The two groups were similar for their age, gender, BMI, ASA, the tumor characteristics and the indications for operation. While the pathologic results and the operation time showed similarity, the EBL (98+/-87 ml vs 351+/-147 ml, respectively, p=0.001), the transfusion rate (10% vs 40%, respectively, p=0.03) and the hospital stay (4.2+/-1.5 days vs 8.2+/-2.4 days, respectively, p=0.005) were significantly less in the LRC group. Major complications did not occur in the LRC group, but in the OPN group, one patient experienced urine leakage and one patient had a perirenal hematoma. During the mean follow up of 27.3+/-10.8 months and 28.7+/-14.9 months for each group, respectively, all the patients remained disease- free with no evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
CONCLUSIONS
LRC using ultra-thin cryoprobes for the treatment of small RCC showed similar effective oncologic results with the merits of minimal invasiveness, as compared with OPN, during the intermediate term follow up.

Keyword

Cryosurgery; Partial nephrectomy; Renal cell carcinoma

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Cryosurgery
Follow-Up Studies
Hematoma
Humans
Length of Stay
Nephrectomy
Recurrence

Reference

1. Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC. Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cellcarcinoma: 10-year followup. J Urol. 2000; 163:442–445. PMID: 10647650.

2. Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, Rogers C, Varkarakis I, Link RE, Inagaki T, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long-term oncological outcome. J Urol. 2004; 172:871–873. PMID: 15310986.

3. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol. 2002; 167:469–477. PMID: 11792899.

4. Aron M, Gill IS. Renal tumor ablation. Curr Opin Urol. 2005; 15:298–305. PMID: 16093852.

5. Mabjeesh NJ, Avidor Y, Matzkin H. Emerging nephron sparing treatments for kidney tumors: a continuum of modalities from energy ablation to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2004; 171:553–560. PMID: 14713759.

6. Venkatesh R, Weld K, Ames CD, Figenshau SR, Sundaram CP, Andriole GL, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses: effect of tumor location. Urology. 2006; 68:732–736. PMID: 17070343.

7. Baust JG, Gage AA. The molecular basis of cryosurgery. BJU Int. 2005; 95:1187–1191. PMID: 15892798.

8. Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD 3rd, Dupuy DE, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005; 16:765–778. PMID: 15947040.

9. Lee MS, Oh YT, Han WK, Rha KH, Choi YD, Hong SJ, et al. CT findings after nephron-sparing surgery of renal tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189:264–271.

10. Luciani LG, Cestari R, Tallarigo C. Incidental renal cell carcinoma-age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982~1997). Urology. 2000; 56:58–62. PMID: 10869624.

11. Gill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Steinberg A, Mascha E, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol. 2003; 170:64–68. PMID: 12796646.

12. Lehman DS, Landman J. Kidney cancer ablative therapy: indications and patient selection. Curr Urol Rep. 2008; 9:34–43. PMID: 18366972.

13. Cestari A, Guazzoni G, dell'Acqua V, Nava L, Cardone G, Balconi G, et al. Laparoscopic cryoablation of solid renal masses: intermediate term followup. J Urol. 2004; 172:1267–1270. PMID: 15371821.

14. Gill IS, Remer EM, Hasan WA, Strzempkowski B, Spaliviero M, Steinberg AP, et al. Renal cryoablation: outcome at 3 years. J Urol. 2005; 173:1903–1907. PMID: 15879772.

15. Lawatsch EJ, Langenstroer P, Byrd GF, See WA, Quiroz FA, Begun FP. Intermediate results of laparoscopic cryoablation in 59 patients at the Medical College of Wisconsin. J Urol. 2006; 175:1225–1229. PMID: 16515964.

16. Wyler SF, Sulser T, Ruszat R, Weltzien B, Forster TH, Provenzano M, et al. Intermediate-term results of retroperitoneoscopy-assisted cryotherapy for small renal tumours using multiple ultrathin cryoprobes. Eur Urol. 2007; 51:971–979. PMID: 17084515.

17. Hruby G, Reisiger K, Venkatesh R, Yan Y, Landman J. Comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic cryoablation for renal hilar tumors. Urology. 2006; 67:50–54. PMID: 16413331.

18. Weld KJ, Figenshau RS, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB, Ames CD, Clayman RV, et al. Laparoscopic cryoablation for small renal masses: three-year follow-up. Urology. 2007; 69:448–451. PMID: 17382142.

19. Wright AD, Turk TM, Nagar MS, Phelan MW, Perry KT. Endophytic lesions: a predictor of failure in laparoscopic renal cryoablation. J Endourol. 2007; 21:1493–1496. PMID: 18186689.

20. Bandi G, Hedican SP, Nakada SY. Current practice patterns in the use of ablation technology for the management of small renal masses at academic centers in the United States. Urology. 2008; 71:113–117. PMID: 18242377.

21. McKiernan J, Yossepowitch O, Kattan MW, Simmons R, Motzer RJ, Reuter VE, et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors: pathologic findings and impact on outcome. Urology. 2002; 60:1003–1009. PMID: 12475658.

22. Brashears JH 3rd, Raj GV, Crisci A, Young MD, Dylewski D, Nelson R, et al. Renal cryoablation and radio frequency ablation: an evaluation of worst case scenarios in a porcine model. J Urol. 2005; 173:2160–2165. PMID: 15879879.

23. Warlick CA, Lima GC, Allaf ME, Varkarakis I, Permpongkosol S, Schaeffer EM, et al. Clinical sequelae of radiographic iceball involvement of collecting system during computed tomography-guided percutanous renal tumor cryoablation. Urology. 2006; 67:918–922. PMID: 16698352.

24. Hegarty NJ, Gill IS, Desai MM, Remer EM, O'Malley CM, Kaouk JH. Probe-ablative nephron-sparing surgery: cryoablation versus radiofrequency ablation. Urology. 2006; 68:7–13. PMID: 16857454.

25. Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor. Urology. 2005; 66:23–28. PMID: 16194703.