Brain Neurorehabil.  2014 Mar;7(1):1-4. 10.12786/bn.2014.7.1.1.

The Concept of Metaplasticity

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University College of Medicine, Korea. wooky@hallym.ac.kr

Abstract

The concept of metaplasticity entails a change in the physiological or biochemical state of synapses that alters their ability to generate synaptic plasticity by integrating individual synaptic events. The characteristics of metaplasticity would be the fact that those synaptic changes last in certain period time with association of activity in time, homosynaptically or heterosynaptically. Recently introduced non-invasive brain stimulation enables us to observe the metaplastic changes in vivo, which would give us a insight in developing new effective therapeutic approach based on synaptic plasticity and metaplasticity.

Keyword

metaplasticity; neuronal plasticity; transcranial magnetic stimulation

MeSH Terms

Brain
Neuronal Plasticity
Plastics
Synapses
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Plastics

Cited by  1 articles

Enhancing Motor Learning with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sung-Hwa Ko, Yong-Il Shin
Brain Neurorehabil. 2015;8(2):81-85.    doi: 10.12786/bn.2015.8.2.81.


Reference

1. Bliss TVP, Lomo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J Physiol. 1973; 232:331–356.
2. Abraham WC, Bear MF. Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1996; 19:126–130.
3. Abraham WC, Tate WP. Metaplasticity: A new vista across the field of synaptic plasticity. Prog Neurobiol. 1997; 52:303–323.
4. Hulme SR, Jones OD, Abraham WC. Emerging roles of metaplasticity in behaviour and disease. Trends Neurosci. 2013; 36:353–362.
5. Disterhoft JF, Oh MM. Learning, aging and intrinsic neuronal plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29:587–599.
6. Uzakov S, Frey JU, Korz V. Reinforcement of rat hippocampal LTP by holeboard training. Learn Mem. 2005; 12:165–171.
7. Redondo RL, Morris R. Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12:17–30.
8. Malenka RC, Bear MF. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron. 2004; 44:5–21.
9. Dudek SM, Bear MF. Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89:4363–4367.
10. Kelso SR, Brown TH. Differential conditioning of associative synaptic enhancement in hippocampal brain slices. Science. 1986; 232:85–87.
11. Gustafsson B, Wigstrom H. Hippocampal long-lasting potentiation produced by pairing single volleys and brief conditioning tetani evoked in separate afferents. J Neurosci. 1986; 6:1575–1582.
12. Huang YY, Colino A, Selig DK, Malenka RC. The influence of prior synaptic activity on the induction of long-term potentiation. Science. 1992; 255:730–733.
13. Raymond CR, Thompson VL, Tate WP, Abraham WC. Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Trigger Homosynaptic Protein Synthesis to Prolong Long-Term Potentiation. J Neurosci. 2000; 20:969–976.
14. Manahan-Vaughan D. Priming of group 2 metabotropic glutamate receptors facilitates induction of long-term depression in the dentate gyrus of freely moving rats. Neuropharmacology. 1998; 37:1459–1464.
15. Manahan-Vaughan D. Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors modulate long-term depression in the hippocampal CA1 region of two rat strains in vivo. Neuropharmacology. 2000; 39:1952–1958.
16. Rodrigues SM, Bauer EP, Farb CR, Schafe GE, LeDoux JE. The Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor mGluR5 Is Required for Fear Memory Formation and Long-Term Potentiation in the Lateral Amygdala. J Neurosci. 2002; 22:5219–5229.
17. Mukherjee S, Manahan-Vaughan D. Role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in persistent forms of hippocampal plasticity and learning. Neuropharmacology. 2013; 66:65–81.
18. Holland LL, Wagner JJ. Primed Facilitation of Homosynaptic Long-Term Depression and Depotentiation in Rat Hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1998; 18:887–894.
19. Yeung LC, Shouval HZ, Blais BS, Cooper LN. Synaptic homeostasis and input selectivity follow from a calcium-dependent plasticity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101:14943–14948.
20. Fusi S, Drew PJ, Abbott LF. Cascade Models of Synaptically Stored Memories. Neuron. 2005; 45:599–611.
21. Zelcer I, Cohen H, Richter-Levin G, Lebiosn T, Grossberger T, Barkai E. A cellular correlate of learning-induced metaplasticity in the hippocampus. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 16:460–468.
22. Abraham WC, Mason-Parker SE, Bear MF, Webb S, Tate WP. Heterosynaptic metaplasticity in the hippocampus in vivo: a BCM-like modifiable threshold for LTP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98:10924–10929.
23. Buschler A, Manahan-Vaughan D. Brief environmental enrichment elicits metaplasticity of hippocampal synaptic potentiation in vivo. Front Behav Neurosci. 2012; 6:85.
24. Cooper LN, Bear MF. The BCM theory of synapse modification at 30: interaction of theory with experiment. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13:798–810.
25. Bienenstock EL, Cooper LN, Munro PW. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci. 1982; 2:32–48.
26. Abraham WC. Metaplasticity: tuning synapses and networks for plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9:387.
27. Khedr EM. Longlasting antalgic effects of daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central and peripheral neuropathic pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76:833–838.
28. Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, Park JW, Lee KH, Jang SH, Yoo WK, Hallet M. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2006; 37:1471–1476.
29. Iyer MB, Schleper N, Wassermann EM. Priming stimulation enhances the depressant effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:10867–10872.
30. Murakami T, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Lu M-K, Ziemann U. Homeostatic metaplasticity of corticospinal excitatory and intracortical inhibitory neural circuits in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2012; 590:5765–5768.
31. Huang YZ, Rothwell JC, Edwards MJ, Chen RS. Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18:563–570.
Full Text Links
  • BN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr