Clin Endosc.  2011 Dec;44(2):123-128. 10.5946/ce.2011.44.2.123.

Short-term Clinical Outcomes Based on Risk Factors of Recurrence after Removing Common Bile Duct Stones with Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea. drkim@gilhospital.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Recurrence is an important late complication of endotherapy of bile duct stones. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) can be used as an alternative method of removing difficult bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to evaluate short term clinical outcomes after removing common bile duct (CBD) stones using EPLBD.
METHODS
A retrospective review was performed based on the medical records of 141 patients who received EPLBD, with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy, between September 2008 and February 2010. Of these, 50 patients, were enrolled in the study. Clinical and endoscopic parameters were analyzed to identify risk factors for CBD stones recurrence.
RESULTS
Male:Female ratio was 22:28 (mean age, 67.4+/-14.4 years). Recurrence rate was 24.0% (12/50). Mean follow-up period was 10.8+/-4.5 months. Nineteen (38.0%) had a history of surgery and 20 (40.0%) were comorbid with periampullary diverticula. Mean diameters of the stones and CBD were 13.8+/-4.3 mm and 20.1+/-7.2 mm, respectively. In univariate analysis, large CBD stones (> or =12 mm) and angulated CBD (angle < or =145degrees) were identified as the significant predictors of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, angulated CBD (angle < or =145degrees) was the significant independent risk factor for recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Close follow-up seems necessary in patients with angulated CBD (angle < or =145degrees).

Keyword

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation; Common bile duct stones; Recurrence; Risk factors

MeSH Terms

Bile Ducts
Common Bile Duct
Dilatation
Diverticulum
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Medical Records
Multivariate Analysis
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic

Cited by  2 articles

총담관 각도가 총담관결석 재발에 미치는 임상적 영향: 메타분석 및 고찰
Seongyul Ryu, Ik Hyun Jo, Seonhoo Kim, Yeon-Ji Kim, Woo Chul Chung
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020;76(4):199-205.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.76.4.199.

Clinical Impact of Common Bile Duct Angulation for Recurrence of Bile Duct Stones
Se Woo Park
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2020;76(4):177-178.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2020.76.4.177.


Reference

1. Pereira-Lima JC, Jakobs R, Winter UH, et al. Long-term results (7 to 10 years) of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for the recurrence of biliary symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998; 48:457–464. PMID: 9831832.
Article
2. Cotton PB, Geenen JE, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts. Ann Surg. 1998; 227:201–204. PMID: 9488517.
Article
3. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335:909–918. PMID: 8782497.
Article
4. Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, Gunsar F. Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57:156–159. PMID: 12556775.
Article
5. Kim DI, Kim MH, Lee SK, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of primary bile duct stones after endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001; 54:42–48. PMID: 11427840.
Article
6. Keizman D, Shalom MI, Konikoff FM. An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20:1594–1599. PMID: 16858527.
Article
7. Prat F, Malak NA, Pelletier G, et al. Biliary symptoms and complications more than 8 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterology. 1996; 110:894–899. PMID: 8608900.
Article
8. Hawes RH, Cotton PB, Vallon AG. Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology. 1990; 98:1008–1012. PMID: 2311858.
Article
9. Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, et al. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:1154–1160. PMID: 17945223.
Article
10. Lobo DN, Balfour TW, Iftikhar SY, Rowlands BJ. Periampullary diverticula and pancreaticobiliary disease. Br J Surg. 1999; 86:588–597. PMID: 10361174.
Article
11. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37:383–393. PMID: 2070995.
Article
12. Maydeo A, Bhandari S. Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2007; 39:958–961. PMID: 17701853.
13. Baron TH, Harewood GC. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:1455–1460. PMID: 15307859.
Article
14. Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57:151–155. PMID: 12556774.
Article
15. Minami A, Hirose S, Nomoto T, Hayakawa S. Small sphincterotomy combined with papillary dilation with large balloon permits retrieval of large stones without mechanical lithotripsy. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13:2179–2182. PMID: 17465497.
Article
16. Attasaranya S, Cheon YK, Vittal H, et al. Large-diameter biliary orifice balloon dilation to aid in endoscopic bile duct stone removal: a multicenter series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:1046–1052. PMID: 18178208.
Article
17. Cheon YK, Lehman GA. Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 18:461–464. PMID: 16607138.
Article
18. Ohashi A, Tamada K, Wada S, et al. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation: long-term follow-up study. Dig Endosc. 2009; 21:73–77. PMID: 19691777.
Article
19. Ando T, Tsuyuguchi T, Okugawa T, et al. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. Gut. 2003; 52:116–121. PMID: 12477771.
Article
20. Miyazawa Y, Okinaga K, Nishida K, Okano T. Recurrent common bile duct stones associated with periampullary duodenal diverticula and calcium bilirubinate stones. Int Surg. 1995; 80:120–124. PMID: 8530225.
21. Novacek G, Walgram M, Bauer P, Schöfl R, Gangl A, Pötzi R. The relationship between juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and biliary stone disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997; 9:375–379. PMID: 9160201.
Article
22. Baek YH, Kim HJ, Park JH, et al. Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2009; 54:36–41. PMID: 19696548.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr