J Korean Med Sci.  2014 Jan;29(1):137-140. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.1.137.

The Successful Implantation of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Destination Therapy in Korea: Echocardiographic Assessment

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ytlee55@yahoo.com
  • 3Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a good treatment option for the patients ineligible for cardiac transplantation. Several studies have demonstrated that a ventricular assist device improves the quality of life and prognosis of the patients with end-stage heart failure. A 75-yr-old man debilitated with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III-IV due to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction received LVAD implantation as a destination therapy. The patient was discharged with improved functional status (NYHA functional class II) after appropriate cardiac rehabilitation and education about how to manage the device and potential emergency situations. This is the first case of successful continuous-flow LVAD implantation as a destination therapy in Korea.

Keyword

Heart Failure; Mechanical Circulatory Support; Heart-Assist Device; HeartMate II

MeSH Terms

Aged
Dyspnea
Echocardiography
Heart Failure/*surgery
*Heart-Assist Devices
Humans
Male
Prosthesis Implantation
Quality of Life
Republic of Korea
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/*surgery

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Chest X-ray after LVAD implantation. (The illustration of outflow graft is added on the patient's chest radiography)

  • Fig. 2 Checkpoint in echocardiographic assessment after LVAD implantation. (A, B) The axis and laminar flow of inflow conduit in modified apical-4-chamber view, (C) The position of interventricular septum (IVS) and interatrial septum (IAS), (D, E) The flow of inflow cannula in right parasternal view, and (F) IVC diameter in subcostal view.

  • Fig. 3 Hemodynamic change after LVAD implantation. Before the procedure, (A) Left ventricle was severely dilated, (B) IVS and IAS were deviated to right side due to increased left ventricular filling pressure, (C) IVC was dilated, (D) Functional mitral regurgitation of mild degree was observed. After LVAD implantation, (E) LV dimension and (G) IVC diameter were decreased, (F) IVS and IAS appeared in midline position, and (H) Functional MR was significantly decreased.


Reference

1. Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Heitjan DF, Stevenson LW, Dembitsky W, Long JW, Ascheim DD, Tierney AR, Levitan RG, et al. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:1435–1443.
2. Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver M, Milano C, Rogers J, Delgado R, Frazier OH. Long-term destination therapy with the HeartMate XVE left ventricular assist device: improved outcomes since the REMATCH Study. Congest Heart Fail. 2005; 11:133–138.
3. Park SJ, Milano CA, Tatooles AJ, Rogers JG, Adamson RM, Steidley DE, Ewald GA, Sundareswaran KS, Farrar DJ, Slaughter MS. Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2012; 5:241–248.
4. Fang JC. Rise of the machines: left ventricular assist devices as permanent therapy for advanced heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361:2282–2285.
5. Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver MA, Milano CA, Rogers JG, Naka Y, Mancini D, Miller LW. Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation. 2007; 116:497–505.
6. Cowger J, Sundareswaran K, Rogers JG, Park SJ, Pagani FD, Bhat G, Jaski B, Farrar DJ, Slaughter MS. Predicting survival in patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: the HeartMate II risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:313–321.
7. Lee S, Park YH, Lim SH, Kwak YT, Kim H, Chang BC. Successful mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2007; 15:243–245.
8. Topilsky Y, Maltais S, Oh JK, Atchison FW, Perrault LP, Carrier M, Park SJ. Focused review on transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of patients with continuous axial left ventricular assist devices. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011; 2011:187434.
9. Mookadam F, Kendall CB, Wong RK, Kalya A, Warsame T, Arabia FA, Lusk J, Moustafa S, Steidley E, Quader N, et al. Left ventricular assist devices: physiologic assessment using echocardiography for management and optimization. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012; 38:335–345.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr