Korean J Lab Med.  2007 Oct;27(5):324-329. 10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.324.

Analysis of Positive Results in Mediace Rapid Plasma Reagin and Treponema pallidum Latex Agglutination as the Automated Syphilis Test

• Huh HJ
• Lee KK
• Kim ES
• Chae SL

• KMID: 1781530
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.324

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the results of automated and quantitative methods for the diagnosis of syphilis, Mediace Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) and Mediace Treponema pallidum Latex Agglutination (TPLA) (Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd, Japan) with those of conventional methods. METHODS: Sera from 3,896 persons who had health checkups between December 2005 and November 2006 were included in the evaluation of positive rates and biological false positives (BFP) for Mediace RPR and TPLA. In addition, 134 patients' sera positive for automated Mediace RPR or TPLA were tested for VDRL and TPHA. Discrepancies between TPLA and TPHA results were confirmed by the RecomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM (Mikrogen GmbH, Germany). Automated Mediace RPR and TPLA were performed using the Hitachi 7600 chemistry autoanalyzer (Hitachi, Japan). Samples with positive Mediace RPR and negative TPLA results were defined as BFP. RESULTS: Positive rate of automated Mediace RPR was 0.23% (9/3,896). BFP of the Mediace RPR was 0.18%. Positive rate of automated TPLA was 1.62% (37/2,284). Among the 134 patients' sera, 33 (24.6%) showed a discrepancy between conventional VDRL and automated Mediace RPR results: Among 31 Mediace RPR(+)/VDRL(-) sera, 13 were positive and 18 were negative for TPLA. The remaining 2 sera of discrepancy with Mediace RPR(-)/VDRL(+) were all positive for TPLA. There were seven sera that showed a discrepancy between automated TPLA and TPHA results: Two sera with Mediace RPR(+)/TPLA(-)/TPHA(+) showed negative recomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM results, and among five sera with TPLA(+)/TPHA(-), three demonstrated IgG or IgM by recomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM. CONCLUSIONS: The results of comparison data demonstrated that automated TPLA results had a high concordance with recomBlot Treponemal IgG/IgM results. Moreover, there are additional advantages of automated methods such as quantitative detection, low infection risk, and no influence by human handling.

Keyword

Automated Mediace RPR; TPLA; VDRL; TPHA

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Agglutination
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Immunoglobulin G/analysis
Immunoglobulin M/analysis
Latex Fixation Tests
Male
Middle Aged
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Reagins/*blood
Syphilis/*diagnosis
Syphilis Serodiagnosis/*methods
Treponema pallidum/*immunology/isolation & purification

Reference

1.Cho YH., Kim HO., Lee JB., Lee MG. Syphilis prevalence has rapidly decreased in South Korea. Sex Transm Infect. 2003. 79:323–4.

2.Clyne B., Jerrard DA. Syphilis testing. J Emerg Med. 2000. 18:361–7.

3.Egglestone SI., Turner AJ. Serological diagnosis of syphilis. PHLS Syphilis Serology Working Group. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000. 3:158–62.

4.Larsen SA., Steiner BM., Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995. 8:1–21.

5.Wheeler HL., Agarwal S., Goh BT. Dark ground microscopy and treponemal serological tests in the diagnosis of early syphilis. Sex Transm Infect. 2004. 80:411–4.

6.Seo DH., Lee YR., Oh YC., Kim DJ. Study on serologic test for syphilis as a surrogate marker for human immunodeficiency virus infection among Korean blood donors. Korean J Blood Transfus. 2001. 12:231–6. 서동희, 이용래, 오영철, 김동집. 국내헌혈자에서매독검사의 HIV 감염대리표지자에관한연구. 대한수혈학회지 2001;12: 231-6.).

7.Kirchner JT. Syphilis–an STD on the increase. Am Fam Physician. 1991. 44:843–54.

8.Geusau A., Kittler H., Hein U., Dangl-Erlach E., Stingl G., Tschachler E. Biological false-positive tests comprise a high proportion of Venereal Disease Research Laboratory reactions in an analysis of 300,000 sera. Int J STD AIDS. 2005. 16:722–6.

9.Diaz T., Almeida MG., Georg I., Maia SC., De Souza RV., Markowitz LE. Evaluation of the Determine Rapid Syphilis TP assay using sera. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004. 11:98–101.

10.Byrne RE., Laska S., Bell M., Larson D., Phillips J., Todd J. Evaluation of a Treponema pallidum western immunoblot assay as a confirmatory test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1992. 30:115–22.

11.Larsen SA., Hambie EA., Pettit DE., Perryman MW., Kraus SJ. Specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility among the fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption test, the microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibodies, and the hemagglutination treponemal test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981. 14:441–5.

12.Calonge N. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for syphilis infection: recommendation statement. Ann Fam Med. 2004. 2:362–5.

13.Johnson PC., Farnie MA. Testing for syphilis. Dermatol Clin. 1994. 12:9–17.

14.Backhouse JL., Nesteroff SI. Treponema pallidum western blot: comparison with the FTA-ABS test as a confirmatory test for syphilis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001. 39:9–14.

15.Hagedorn HJ., Kraminer-Hagedorn A., De Bosschere K., Hulstaert F., Pottel H., Zrein M. Evaluation of INNO-LIA syphilis assay as a confirmatory test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002. 40:973–8.

16.Dang Q., Feng J., Lu X., Zhang X., Xu H., Liu C, et al. Evaluation of specific antibodies for early diagnosis and management of syphilis. Int J Dermatol. 2006. 45:1169–71.