Ann Lab Med.  2013 Sep;33(5):319-325. 10.3343/alm.2013.33.5.319.

Evaluation of the Performance of a Micromethod for Measuring Urinary Iodine by Using Six Sigma Quality Metrics

Affiliations
  • 1Cardiovascular, Diabetes & Nutrition Research Centre, Institute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. husniza@imr.gov.my
  • 2Nutrition Division, Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The urinary iodine micromethod (UIMM) is a modification of the conventional method and its performance needs evaluation.
METHODS
UIMM performance was evaluated using the method validation and 2008 Iodine Deficiency Disorders survey data obtained from four urinary iodine (UI) laboratories. Method acceptability tests and Sigma quality metrics were determined using total allowable errors (TEas) set by two external quality assurance (EQA) providers.
RESULTS
UIMM obeyed various method acceptability test criteria with some discrepancies at low concentrations. Method validation data calculated against the UI Quality Program (TUIQP) TEas showed that the Sigma metrics were at 2.75, 1.80, and 3.80 for 51+/-15.50 microg/L, 108+/-32.40 microg/L, and 149+/-38.60 microg/L UI, respectively. External quality control (EQC) data showed that the performance of the laboratories was within Sigma metrics of 0.85-1.12, 1.57-4.36, and 1.46-4.98 at 46.91+/-7.05 microg/L, 135.14+/-13.53 microg/L, and 238.58+/-17.90 microg/L, respectively. No laboratory showed a calculated total error (TEcalc)CONCLUSIONS
UIMM showed unacceptable performance for the iodine deficiency levels and variable performance at other concentrations according to different TEas.

Keyword

Urinary iodine; Method evaluation; Sigma metrics; Quality control; Method acceptability

MeSH Terms

Humans
Iodine/*urine
Laboratories/standards
Quality Control
Spectrophotometry/*standards
Urinalysis/*standards
Iodine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Urinary iodine micromethod's normalized method decision chart against The Urinary Iodine Quality Program (TUIQP) TEas based on the 2008 National IDD Survey EQA results (Lab A [n=20], Lab B [n=18], Lab C [n=12], and Lab D [n=6]) and the 2006 method validation study (MV). According to urinary iodine ranges in Table 1.Abbreviations: L, low control; M-L, medium-low control; M-H, medium-high control; H, high control.

  • Fig. 2 Urinary iodine micromethod's normalized method decision chart based on the 2008 national IDD survey EQA results (Lab A [n=20], Lab B [n=18], Lab C [n=12], and Lab D [n=6]) and against EQUIP TEas. According to urinary iodine ranges in Table 1.Abbreviations: L, low control; M-H, medium-high control; H, high control.


Reference

1. Hetzel BS. Iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) and their eradication. Lancet. 1983; 2:1126–1129. PMID: 6138653.
Article
2. World Health Organization/UNICEF/International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders. Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination: a guide for programme managers. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO;2007.
3. World Health Organization/UNICEF/International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders. Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination: a guide for programme managers. (WHO/NHD/01.1). Geneva: WHO;2001.
4. Institute for Medical Research, Ministry of Health, Malaysia. Survey of iodine deficiency disorders in Peninsular Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Health;1996.
5. Selamat R. Report on the monitoring of iodine deficiency in Pahang, Malaysia. Kuantan: State Health Department of Pahang;2005.
6. State Health Department of Perak. Report on the monitoring of urinary iodine in Perak, Malaysia. Ipoh: State Health Department of Perak;2006.
7. Selamat R, Mohamud WN, Zainuddin AA, Rahim NS, Ghaffar S, Aris T. Iodine deficiency status and iodised salt consumption in Malaysia: findings from a national iodine deficiency disorders survey. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010; 19:578–585. PMID: 21147721.
8. Dunn JT, Crutchfield HE, Gutekunst R, Dunn AD. Two simple methods for measuring iodine in urine. Thyroid. 1993; 3:119–123. PMID: 8369650.
Article
9. Pino S, Fang SL, Braverman LE. Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. Clin Chem. 1996; 42:239–243. PMID: 8595717.
Article
10. Husniza H, Wan Nazaimoon WM. A cost-effective modified micro method for measuring urinary iodine. Trop Biomed. 2006; 23:109–115. PMID: 17041559.
11. Ohashi T, Yamaki M, Pandav CS, Karmarkar MG, Irie M. Simple microplate method for determination of urinary iodine. Clin Chem. 2000; 46:529–536. PMID: 10759477.
Article
12. Westgard JO, editor. Six sigma quality design and control. 2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC Inc.;2006.
13. Westgard JO, editor. Basic method validation. 2nd ed. Madison: Westgard QC Inc.;2003.
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr