J Korean Soc Surg Hand.  2009 Jun;14(2):61-66.

Comparison of the Clinical Results of HILT Versus ESWT in the Lateral Epicondylitis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Yonsei University, College of Medicine Seoul, Korea. kangho56@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical results of High intensity laser therapy (HILT) versus Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the lateral epicondylitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty patients who suffer from lateral epicondylitis for more than six month duration were randomly assigned two treatment groups. Group 1 (n=25) was treated with HILT using a HIRO 3.0 laser(ASA srl, Arcugnano, Italy) and total energy was administered approximately 1200J following a standard protocol for each session; Group 2 (n=25) recieved with ESWT treatment using an EvoTron(Switech Medical AG, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland) for a total of 1000 shocks for each session. The patients were evaluated by assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS) and simple elbow test (SET). Comparision of overall clinical outcomes were evaluated by Roles and Maudsley score at 9 months.
RESULTS
Average VAS and SET scores were significantly improved in two groups, also achieved significant improvement of symptoms at 9 months follow up according to Roles and Maudesley scores(P<0.05). The success rate in the HILT group was 76 % and in the ESWT group was 72 %.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that HILT could be considered as effective and noninvasive treatment modality for lateral epicondylitis.

Keyword

Lateral epicondylitis; High intensity laser therapy (HILT); Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT)

MeSH Terms

Elbow
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Laser Therapy
Shock
Full Text Links
  • JKSSH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr