Korean J Ophthalmol.  2013 Aug;27(4):256-260. 10.3341/kjo.2013.27.4.256.

Clinical Outcomes of Double Staining and Additional ILM Peeling during ERM Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. ihyun@inje.ac.kr
  • 2Ophthalmology Research Foundation, Inje University, Busan, Korea.
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To assess the clinical outcomes in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) patients after vitrectomy and ERM removal with or without additional indocyanine green (ICG)-assisted internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.
METHODS
The medical records of 43 patients with an idiopathic ERM that underwent vitrectomy and ERM removal between July 2007 and April 2010 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: triamcinolone-assisted simple ERM peeling only (group A, n = 23) and triamcinolone-assisted ERM peeling followed by ICG staining and peeling of the remaining internal ILM (group B, n = 20).
RESULTS
No difference was found between the two groups in terms of visual acuity, macular thickness, P1 amplitude or implicit time on multifocal-electroretinogram (mfERG) at six and 12 months postoperatively. In group B, ICG staining after ERM peeling demonstrated that the ILM had been removed together with the ERM in 12 eyes (60%), and all 12 eyes showed punctate retinal hemorrhages during ERM peeling. There was no recurrence of an ERM in either group.
CONCLUSIONS
Additional procedures involving ICG staining and ILM peeling during ERM surgery do not appear to have an additive effect on the clinical outcomes in terms of visual acuity, retinal function based on mfERG, or recurrence rate.

Keyword

Double staining; Epiretinal membrane; Internal limiting membrane

MeSH Terms

Aged
Coloring Agents/diagnostic use
Epiretinal Membrane/*surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Indocyanine Green/*diagnostic use
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications/*diagnosis
Retinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity
*Vitrectomy
Coloring Agents
Indocyanine Green

Cited by  1 articles

Clinical Outcomes of Indocyanine Green-Assisted Peeling of the Internal Limiting Membrane in Epiretinal Membrane Surgery
Woo Seok Choi, Woo Jin Jeong, Yoon Hyung Kwon
J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2016;57(3):445-452.    doi: 10.3341/jkos.2016.57.3.445.


Reference

1. Kawasaki R, Wang JJ, Sato H, et al. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in an adult Japanese population: the Funagata Study. Eye (Lond). 2009; 23:1045–1051. PMID: 19440207.
Article
2. Klein R, Klein BE, Wang Q, Moss SE. The epidemiology of epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1994; 92:403–425. PMID: 7886875.
3. Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, et al. Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes. The Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:1033–1040. PMID: 9186446.
4. Smiddy WE, Maguire AM, Green WR, et al. Idiopathic epiretinal membranes: ultrastructural characteristics and clinicopathologic correlation. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96:811–820. PMID: 2740079.
5. Grewing R, Mester U. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:323–326. PMID: 8703883.
Article
6. Shimada H, Nakashizuka H, Hattori T, et al. Double staining with brilliant blue G and double peeling for epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:1370–1376. PMID: 19427701.
Article
7. Lee JE, Yoon TJ, Oum BS, et al. Toxicity of indocyanine green injected into the subretinal space: subretinal toxicity of indocyanine green. Retina. 2003; 23:675–681. PMID: 14574254.
8. Park DW, Dugel PU, Garda J, et al. Macular pucker removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: pilot study. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:62–64. PMID: 12511347.
Article
9. Sivalingam A, Eagle RC Jr, Duker JS, et al. Visual prognosis correlated with the presence of internal-limiting membrane in histopathologic specimens obtained from epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology. 1990; 97:1549–1552. PMID: 2255528.
10. Smiddy WE, Feuer W, Cordahi G. Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:1471–1476. PMID: 11470703.
Article
11. Shea M. The surgical management of macular pucker in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 1980; 87:70–74. PMID: 7375088.
Article
12. Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, et al. Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001; 42:229–234. PMID: 11133873.
13. Mochizuki Y, Enaida H, Hisatomi T, et al. The internal limiting membrane peeling with brilliant blue G staining for retinal detachment due to macular hole in high myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:1009. PMID: 18577657.
Article
14. Enaida H, Ishibashi T. Brilliant blue in vitreoretinal surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008; 42:115–125. PMID: 18535385.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr