Korean J Physiol Pharmacol.  2013 Oct;17(5):405-409. 10.4196/kjpp.2013.17.5.405.

Sex Differences in Hippocampal Neuronal Sensitization by Nicotine in M. gerbils

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 136-705, Korea. bgchun@korea.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Anatomy, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Korea.

Abstract

We studied the sex different nicotine effect on evoked population spike amplitudes (ePSA) and connexin (Cx) expression in the hippocampus CA1 area of gerbils. Acute doses of nicotine bitartrate (0.5 mg/kg: NT-0.5) slightly reduced ePSA in males but markedly augmented that in females. Acute NT (5.0 mg/kg) markedly increased the ePSA in all gerbils. Unlike acute NT-0.5, repeated NT-0.5 injection (twice a day for 7 days) significantly increased the ePSA in males and slightly affected the NT-0.5 effect in females. The Cx36 and Cx43 expression levels as well as Cx expressing neuronal populations were significantly increased by repeated NT-0.5 in in both male and female gerbils, and particularly, Cx43 expression was somewhat prominent in females. These results demonstrated a sex difference with respect to the nicotine effect on hippocampal bisynaptic excitability, irrelevant to connexin expression.

Keyword

Connexin; Evoked population spike; Hippocampus; Nicotine; Sex difference

MeSH Terms

Animals
Connexins
Connexin 43
Female
Gerbillinae*
Hippocampus
Male
Neurons*
Nicotine*
Sex Characteristics*
Connexins
Connexin 43
Nicotine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Illustrations of the recording of evoked population spike amplitude (ePSA). (A) Position of stimulating and recording electrodes in the hippocampus CA1 area. (B) Patterns of evoked population spikes recorded in different levels of the pyramidal neuron. (C) Dose-dependent nicotine effect on ePSA in male gerbils. Saline, saline, 1 ml/kg i.p. injection; NT-0.5, nicotine bitartrate, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p. injection; NT-5.0, nicotine bitartrate, 5.0 mg/kg, i.p. injection.

  • Fig. 2 Acute and repeated nicotine effects on evoked population spike amplitude. (A) Sex-related difference in the response of ePSA to NT-0.5 and NT-5.0, respectively. Symbols: ○, saline, 1 ml/kg i.p. injection; •, NT-0.5: nicotine bitartrate, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p. injection; ▴, NT-5.0: nicotine bitartrate, 5.0 mg/kg, i.p. injection. (B) Responses of ePSA to a challenging NT-0.5 in male and female gerbils pretreated with repeated injections of NT-0.5 s.c., twice per day for 7 days or 28 days. ○, acute NT-0.5 injection; •, pretreatment with NT-0.5 for 7 days; ▴, pretreatment with NT-0.5 for 28 days. Each bar represents the mean±SE (n=5 or 6). * and ** indicate p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, compared to control groups: (A) saline group and (B) NT-0.5 group.

  • Fig. 3 Double immunohistochemistry photographs. (A) The oriens (Or), pyramidal (Py) and radiatum (Rad) layers in the hippocampus CA1 area (×200); (B) anti-NeuN immunoreactive neurons, (C) anti-Cx36 immunoreactive dots; (D) merged image of B and C (×600). Scale bars: (A) 50 µm and (D) 7 µm.

  • Fig. 4 Increases of (A) anti-Cx36 and (B) anti-Cx43 IR dots by a challenging NT-0.5 in gerbils pretreated with repeated NT-0.5 injections twice a day for 7 days. The following data were obtained from 5 animals by blind counting in a predefined region (300×400 µm2) of the pyramidal layer in serial 16 images per animal. * and ** indicate p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively, in comparison to the saline treated group. †Means p<0.05, with respect to comparisons between male and female groups. anti-Cx36, -Cx43 dots, total count of anti-Cx36, -Cx43 IR dots; anti-Cx36, -Cx43 dots/Neuron, count of anti-Cx36, -Cx43 IR dots per an anti-NeuN IR neuron; anti-Cx36, -Cx43 IR+Neurons, count of anti-NeuN IR neurons with anti-Cx36, -Cx43 IR dots. SS & SN, Saline & NT-0.5 challenge after repeated saline pretreatment for 7 days; NS & NN, Saline & NT-0.5 challenge after repeated NT-0.5 pretreatment for 7 days.


Reference

1. Dani JA, Ji D, Zhou FM. Synaptic plasticity and nicotine addiction. Neuron. 2001; 31:349–352. PMID: 11516393.
Article
2. Shim I, Javaid JI, Wirtshafter D, Jang SY, Shin KH, Lee HJ, Chung YC, Chun BG. Nicotine-induced behavioral sensitization is associated with extracellular dopamine release and expression of c-Fos in the striatum and nucleus accumbens of the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2001; 121:137–147. PMID: 11275291.
Article
3. Gray R, Rajan AS, Radcliffe KA, Yakehiro M, Dani JA. Hippocampal synaptic transmission enhanced by low concentrations of nicotine. Nature. 1996; 383:713–716. PMID: 8878480.
Article
4. Freund RK, Luntz-Leybman V, Collins AC. Nicotine interferes with GABA-mediated inhibitory processes in mouse hippocampus. Brain Res. 1990; 527:286–291. PMID: 2253036.
Article
5. Traub RD, Pais I, Bibbig A, LeBeau FE, Buhl EH, Hormuzdi SG, Monyer H, Whittington MA. Contrasting roles of axonal (pyramidal cell) and dendritic (interneuron) electrical coupling in the generation of neuronal network oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100:1370–1374. PMID: 12525690.
Article
6. McCracken CB, Roberts DCS. Neuronal gap junctions: expression, function, and implications for behavior. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006; 73:125–151. PMID: 16737903.
Article
7. Colomer C, Olivos Ore LA, Coutry N, Mathieu MN, Arthaud S, Fontanaud P, Iankova I, Macari F, Thouënnon E, Yon L, Anouar Y, Guérineau NC. Functional remodeling of gap junction-mediated electrical communication between adrenal chromaffin cells in stressed rats. J Neurosci. 2008; 28:6616–6626. PMID: 18579734.
Article
8. Tsai CH, Yeh HI, Tian TY, Lee YN, Lu CS, Ko YS. Down-regulating effect of nicotine on connexin43 gap junctions in human umbilical vein endothelial cells is attenuated by statins. Eur J Cell Biol. 2004; 82:589–595. PMID: 15035434.
Article
9. Zhang TA, Tang J, Pidoplichko VI, Dani JA. Addictive nicotine alters local circuit inhibition during the induction of in vivo hippocampal synaptic potentiation. J Neurosci. 2010; 30:6443–6645. PMID: 20445070.
10. Rash JE, Yasumura T, Dudek FE, Nagy JI. Cell-specific expression of connexins and evidence of restricted gap junctional coupling between glial cells and between neurons. J Neurosci. 2001; 21:1983–2000. PMID: 11245683.
Article
11. Urban L, Neill KH, Crain BJ, Nadler JV, Somjen GG. Postischemic synaptic physiology in area CA1 of the gerbil hippocampus studied in vitro. J Neurosci. 1989; 9:3966–3975. PMID: 2585062.
12. Gill R, Kemp JA. Protection of CA1 pyramidal cell function by MK-801 following ischaemia in the gerbil. Neurosci Lett. 1989; 105:101–106. PMID: 2484724.
Article
13. Yun SH, Park KA, Kwon S, Woolley CS, Sullivan PM, Pasternak JF, Trommer BL. Estradiol enhances long term potentiation in hippocampal slices from aged apoE4-TR mice. Hippocampus. 2007; 17:1153–1157. PMID: 17696167.
Article
14. Smith CC, McMahon LL. Estradiol-induced increase in the magnitude of long-term potentiation is prevented by blocking NR2B-containing receptors. J Neurosci. 2006; 26:8517–8522. PMID: 16914677.
Article
15. Perez J, Tranque PA, Naftolin F, Garcia-Segura LM. Gap junctions in the hypothalamic arcuate neurons of ovariectomized and estradiol-treated rats. Neurosci Lett. 1990; 108:17–21. PMID: 2304626.
Article
16. Leranth C, Hajszan T, MacLusky NJ. Androgens increase spine synapse density in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of ovariectomized female rats. J Neurosci. 2004; 24:495–499. PMID: 14724248.
Article
17. Leranth C, Petnehazy O, MacLusky NJ. Gonadal hormones affect spine synaptic density in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of male rats. J Neurosci. 2003; 23:1588–1592. PMID: 12629162.
Article
18. Matsumoto A, Arnold AP, Zamphigi GA, Micevych PE. Androgenic regulation of gap junction between motoneurons in the rat spinal cord. J Neurosci. 1988; 8:4177–4183. PMID: 3183718.
19. Matsuyama S, Matsumoto A, Enomoto T, Nishizaki T. Activation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors induces long-term potentiation in vivo in the intact mouse dentate gyrus. Eur J Neurosci. 2000; 12:3741–3747. PMID: 11029644.
20. Harley CE, Malsbury CW, Squires A, Brown RAM. Testosterone decreases CA1 plasticity in vivo in gonadectomized male rats. Hippocampus. 2000; 10:693–697. PMID: 11153715.
Article
21. Hervé JC, Bourmeyster N, Sarrouilhe D, Duffy HS. Gap junctional complexes: from partners to functions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007; 94:29–65. PMID: 17507078.
Article
22. Oyamada M, Oyamada Y, Takamatsu T. Regulation of connexin expression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005; 1719:6–23. PMID: 16359940.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr