J Korean Bone Joint Tumor Soc.  2013 Jun;19(1):14-19. 10.5292/jkbjts.2013.19.1.14.

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of Extremities

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea. chowanda@naver.com
  • 2Department of Pathology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
We analyzed the oncologic characteristics and outcome of patients with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of extremities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Among the soft tissue tumor patients who were treated between 1999 and 2012, 5 patients who were pathologically confirmed as the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of extremities were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS
There were 1 man and 4 women with mean age of 44 years (37-55 years). The average follow up was 34.6 months (8-87 months). All patients underwent surgical treatment. Only 1 patient had wide resection margin and remaining 4 had marginal (3) or intralesional (1) resection margin. All of 4 patients without wide resection margin developed local recurrence at 10.3 months (8-19 months). Malignant transformation to fibrosarcoma was occurred in 2 patients who developed local recurrence, and 1 patient developed multiple metastases to lung, liver and lymph nodes and expired at 37 months. Three of 5 patients had tumor location abutted to or invasion to major arteries and 1 patient had tumor invading sciatic nerve.
CONCLUSION
It is observed that inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of extremities is usually located near the major neurovascular structure. Wide resection should be considered as the initial surgical treatment because this tumor showed a high local recurrence rate and possibility of malignant transformation.

Keyword

inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor; extremities; margin; wide resection

MeSH Terms

Arteries
Extremities
Female
Fibrosarcoma
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Liver
Lung
Lymph Nodes
Myofibroblasts
Neoplasm Metastasis
Recurrence

Figure

  • Figure 1. 53-year old woman with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor on right thigh. (A, B) Initial MRI shows 14×6×11 cm sized poorly marginated high SI on T2WI soft tissue mass abutted to deep femoral vessel and proximal femoral shaft. (C) Spindle cells with abundant plasma cells and lymphocytes infiltrating between collagen fibers were observed (H&E, ×400). (D) Recurrence was found 19 months after marginal excision. MRI shows 8×5×5.3 cm sized infiltrating soft tissue mass which abutted to deep femoral vessels.

  • Figure 2. 37-year old woman with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor on left elbow. Incisional biopsy was done at another hospital and patient was referred to our clinic. (A, B) Initial MRI shows 8×4.6×4.6 cm sized poorly marginated, infiltrative soft tissue mass in left elbow surrounding meta-diaphysis of radius and abutted to proximal ulnar. Tumor encases ulnar and interosseous artery with suspicious invasion of ulnar nerve, and abutted to radial neurovascular bundle. (C) Marginal excision including radial head and ulnar artery, alcohol ablation of resected radial head, internal fixation and arteriorrhapy with vein graft were done. (D) Pathologic examination shows scar-like, hypocellular pattern which resembles fibromatosis. Spindle cells are dispersed in background of loose collagen and inflammatory cells (H&E, ×400). (E) Local recurrence was developed 9 months after marginal excision. Tumor abutted to ulnar neurovascular bundle.

  • Figure 3. 33-year old woman with inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor on right buttock. (A, B) Initial MRI shows 6×6×5.6 cm sized tumor in right sciatic foramen involving sciatic nerve. After intralesional excision, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy was done. (C) Initial diagnosis was inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Loosely arranged spindle or plump cells are noted in a vascular and abundant collagenous background with a few chronic inflammatory cells (H&E, ×400). (D) 8 months later, local recurrence was developed and patient was referred to our clinic. (E) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was done. MRI shows unchanged size with partial necrosis. Intralesional excision and following adjuvant chemotherapy were done. (F) 10 months later, local recurrence was found and excision was done. (G) Diagnosis was grade 3 spindle cell sarcoma. Tumor shows necrosis and compact fascicles, which consists of spindle cells with pleomorphism and marked hyperchromasia (H&E, ×400).


Reference

References

1. Umiker WO, iverson L. Postinflammatory tumors of the lung; report of four cases simulating xanthoma, fibroma, or plasma cell tumor. J Thorac Surg. 1954; 28:55–63.
2. Stoll LM, Li QK. Cytology of fine-needle aspiration of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011; 39:663–72.
Article
3. Batsakis JG, el-Naggar AK, Luna MA, Goepfert H. “Inflammatory pseudotumor”: what is it? How does it behave? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995; 104:329–31.
Article
4. Pettinato G, Manivel JC, De Rosa N, Dehner LP. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (plasma cell granuloma). Clinicopathologic study of 20 cases with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural observations. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990; 94:538–46.
Article
5. Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor). A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995; 19:859–72.
Article
6. Sakurai H, Hasegawa T, Watanabe Si, Suzuki K, Asamura H, Tsuchiya R. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004; 25:155–9.
7. Vancauwenbergh A, Smet MH, Breysem L. Inflammatory pseudotumor of the lung. JBR-BTR. 2002; 85:209–11.
8. Liu C, Zhao X, Zhao Z, Lu P, Jin F, Li G. Malignant inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the prostate. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:e144–7.
Article
9. Dishop MK, Warner BW, Dehner LP, et al. Successful treatment of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with malignant transformation by surgical resection and chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003; 25:153–8.
Article
10. Hojo H, Newton WA Jr, Hamoudi AB, et al. Pseudosarcomatous myofibroblastic tumor of the urinary bladder in children: a study of 11 cases with review of the literature. An Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995; 19:1224–36.
11. Masciocchi C, Lanni G, Conti L, et al. Soft-tissue inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) of the limbs: potential and limits of diagnostic imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41:643–9.
Article
12. Horger M, Müller-Schimpfle M, Wehrmann M, et al. Giant bilateral inflammatory pseudotumor arising along the arterial sheath of the lower extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179:637–9.
13. Watanabe K, Tajino T, Sekiguchi M, Suzuki T. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory fibrosarcoma) of the bone. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124:1514–7.
Article
14. Donner LR, Trompler RA, White RR 4th. Progression of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor) of soft tissue into sarcoma after several recurrences. Hum Pathol. 1996; 27:1095–8.
15. Narla LD, Newman B, Spottswood SS, Narla S, Kolli R. Inflammatory pseudotumor. Radiographics. 2003; 23:719–29.
Article
16. Meis JM, Enzinger FM. Inflammatory fibrosarcoma of the mesentery and retroperitoneum. A tumor closely simulating inflammatory pseudotumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 1991; 15:1146–56.
17. Tao YL, Wang ZJ, Han JG, Wei P. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor successfully treated with chemotherapy and nonste-roidals: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18:7100–3.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKBJTS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr