Hip Pelvis.  2013 Mar;25(1):44-50. 10.5371/hp.2013.25.1.44.

Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures in Elderly Patients over 80 Years Old - Comparative Analysis between Femoral Neck Fracture and Intertrochanteric Fracture -

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. paedic@chol.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relative surgical risk and problems in hip hemiarthroplasty for treatment of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients over 80 years old.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between April 2005 and May 2010, 58 patients whose age was over 80 years were available for inclusion in this study. They were divided into two groups: group 1 included 30 patients with femoral neck fracture and group 2 included 28 patients with intertrochanteric fracture. No significant differences in average age, concomitant disease, and walking ability before development of fracture were noted between the two groups. The following factors, including interval from development of fracture to operation, operation time, amount of blood loss, start time of walking after operation, duration of hospital stay, complications, revision rate, and walking ability were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
Operation time was an average of 85.2 minutes in group 1 and 97.5 minutes in group 2(P=0.03). The amount of bleeding was an average of 483 cc in group 1 and 695 cc in group 2(P=0.006). Similar results for walking start and recovery of walking ability after operation were observed in the two groups. No significant differences were observed in duration of hospital stay, complications, and revision rate. While 25 patients in group 1(83.3%) showed restoration of walking ability after operation to the same level of walking before injury, 19 patients in group 2(67.8%) showed restoration of walking ability postoperatively.
CONCLUSION
Even though patients in group 2 showed a longer operation time and a higher amount of blood loss, compared with those in group 1, patients in group 2 had similar surgical risk and complications, compared with those in group 1. Therefore, primary hip hemiarthropalsty could be a good treatment option for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly.

Keyword

Intertrochanteric fracture; Hip arthroplasty; Elderly patient; Relative surgical risk

MeSH Terms

Aged
Femoral Neck Fractures
Femur Neck
Hemiarthroplasty
Hemorrhage
Hip
Hip Fractures
Humans
Length of Stay
Walking

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) M/L taper® prosthesis was used for femoral neck fracture and (B) Versys® beaded fullcoat collored femoral stem for intertrochanteric fracture.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Preoperative radiograph of 84 years old female with unstable intertrochanteric fracture in the right hip. (B) Cementless hemiarthroplasty was done after 3 days from injury. Wire & non-absorbable suture were used for fixation of greater and lesser trochanter. Ambulation using walker began 5 days after operation. (C) At last follow up, the patient restores the walking ability before injury without complication.


Reference

1. Kim KH, Kho DH, Yang JH, Kim DH. Treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. J Korean Soc Fract. 2001. 14:174–180.
Article
2. Johnell O, Nilsson B, Obrant K, Sernbo I. Age and sex pattern of hip fracture - - changes in 30 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984. 55:290–292.
3. Chang JD, Kang ST, Lee EJ, Choi SJ, Chang HK, Lee CJ. A study of the factors which influence on the one-year mortality rate after hemiarthroplasty in older patients with hip fracture. J Korean Hip Soc. 1998. 10:225–232.
4. Bickel WH, Jackson AE. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: an analysis of the end results of 126 fractures treated by various methods. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950. 91:14–24.
5. Cobelli NJ, Sadler AH. Ender rod versus compression screw fixation of hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985. (201):123–129.
Article
6. Kang CN, Kim JO, Kim DW, Koh YD, Ko SH, Lee KW. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and compression hip screw on elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Korean Soc Fract. 1997. 10:738–745.
Article
7. Park MS, Choi SS. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck and unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1991. 26:482–488.
Article
8. Khan RJ, MacDowell A, Crossman P, et al. Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop. 2002. 26:229–232.
Article
9. Kim YH, Park GC, An SC, Choi IY. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty using cement for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fracture in elders - 2 to 5 year results. J Korean Hip Soc. 2001. 13:330–337.
10. Alarcòn T, González-Montalvo JI, Bárcena A, Saez P. Further experience of nonagenarians with hip fractures. Injury. 2001. 32:555–558.
Article
11. van de Kerkhove MP, Antheunis PS, Luitse JS, Goslings JC. Hip fractures in nonagenarians: perioperative mortality and survival. Injury. 2008. 39:244–248.
Article
12. Ooi LH, Wong TH, Toh CL, Wong HP. Hip fractures in nonagenarians--a study on operative and non-operative management. Injury. 2005. 36:142–147.
Article
13. LaVelle DG. Campbell WC, Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Fractures and dislocations of the hip. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 2008. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier;3237–3262.
Article
14. Lee SH, Kim JH. Operative treatment of femoral neck fracture. J Korean Hip Soc. 2007. 19:271–276.
15. Leighton RK. Rockwood CA, Green DP, editors. Fractures of the neck of the femur. Rockwood and Green's fracture in adults. 2006. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;1753–1791.
16. Kim BS, Lew S, Ko SH, Cho SD, Yang JH, Park MS. Treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail. J Korean Fract Soc. 2004. 17:1–6.
Article
17. Kim CK, Jim JW, Ahn BW, et al. Intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated with a proximal femoral nail. J Korean Hip Soc. 2005. 17:99–105.
18. Ko SB, Cho MR, Kim TH, Chang IW. Nailing in the patients with intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: comparison gamma nail and proximal femoral nail. J Korean Fract Soc. 2004. 17:295–300.
Article
19. Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, Opdecam P. Primary bipolar arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Acta Orthop Belg. 1994. 60:Suppl 1. 124–128.
20. Choi IY, Kim YH, Kim BH, Lee HS. Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the femoral neck or cervicotrochanteric fracture in patients older than 85 years. J Korean Hip Soc. 2002. 14:83–89.
21. Sierra RJ, Timperley JA, Gie GA. Contemporary cementing technique and mortality during and after Exeter total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009. 24:325–332.
Article
22. Ereth MH, Weber JG, Abel MD, et al. Cemented versus noncemented total hip arthroplasty--embolism, hemodynamics, and intrapulmonary shunting. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992. 67:1066–1074.
Article
23. Zuckerman JD, Skovron ML, Koval KJ, Aharonoff G, Frankel VH. Postoperative complications and mortality associated with operative delay in older patients who have a fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995. 77:1551–1556.
Article
24. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Functional recovery after fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994. 76:751–758.
Article
25. Formiga F, Lopez-Soto A, Sacanella E, Coscojuela A, Suso S, Pujol R. Mortality and morbidity in nonagenarian patients following hip fracture surgery. Gerontology. 2003. 49:41–45.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr