J Vet Sci.  2007 Sep;8(3):269-273. 10.4142/jvs.2007.8.3.269.

Clinical and pathological assessment of different suture techniques for microvascular anastomosis in rat femoral artery

• Radad K
• El-Shazly

• KMID: 1090802
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2007.8.3.269

Abstract

This study examined the clinical and pathologicalfeatures after a microvascular anastomosis of a ratfemoral artery using four different suture techniques.Sixty Sprage-Dawely rats were divided randomly into 4groups. Fifteen bisected arteries (one from each animal) inGroup I, II, III and IV were sutured with the simpleinterrupted suture, continuous suture, sleeve suture andcuff suture, respectively. The anastomosis times in GroupI, II, III and IV were 28.67, 14.67, 15.47 and 15.93 min,respectively. Immediate bleeding that stopped withoutintervention (grade I) was observed in 67%, 73% and60% of the anastomosed vessels in Groups II, III and IV,respectively, while 60% of the vessels in Group I showedlight bleeding that was inhibited by gentile pressure(grade II). All vessels examined appeared to be patent at 5and 15min after the anastomosis. On the 7th daypostoperatively, the vessels of Group I showed the highestpatency rate (93%) compared with Groups II (67%), III(73%) and IV (87%). Moreover, there were morepronounced pathological changes in Group I than in theother groups. These changes included endothelial loss,endothelial proliferation, degeneration and necrosis of thetunica media. Suture materials surrounded by aninflammatory reaction were also observed. In conclusion,the simple interrupted suture is preferable formicrovascular anastomosis due to its highest patency rate.The other techniques investigated can be good alternativesbecause of their short anastomotic time and moderatepathological changes.

Keyword

anastomosis; microsurgery; pathology; suture

MeSH Terms

Anastomosis, Surgical/*methods
Animals
Femoral Artery/pathology/*surgery/ultrastructure
Histocytochemistry
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Random Allocation
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
*Suture Techniques

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Anastomosis time for the different suture techniques. The continuous, sleeve and cuff techniques resulted in a significant reduction of the anastomotic time compared with the interrupted technique (*p < 0.01). †Group I: simple interrupted suture, Group II: continuous suture, Group III: sleeve suture, Group IV: cuff suture.

• 

  Fig. 2 Histopathological findings after an anastomosis of the femoral arteries using the different suture techniques. (A) Simple interrupted suture; Longitudinal section showing a loss of endothelial cells (thin arraow), vacuolated and necrosed tunica media (TM) and the presence of suture materials (thick arrow) surrounded by inflammatory cells (asterisk). (B) Simple interrupted suture; Transverse section showing suture materials in the lumen (arrow) surrounded by endothelial cells. (C) Simple interrupted suture; Transverse section showing an inflammatory cellular reaction surrounding the suture material (arrow). (D) Continuous suture; Transverse section showing slight narrowing of the lumen. (E) Sleeve suture; Transverse section showing narrowing of the lumen and the presence of suture materials in the wall (arrow). (F) Cuff suture; Transverse section showing slight narrowing of the lumen and endothelial proliferation (arrow). H&E stain.

• 

  Fig. 3 Scanning electron micrographs after femoral artery anastomosis using the different suture techniques. (A) Normal femoral artery showing spindle-shaped endothelial cells (asterisk). (B) Simple interrupted suture showing suture threads (asterisk), intimal holes (arrow) and signs of regeneration (arrowhead). (C) Simple interrupted suture showing fibrin network (arrow) partially covering the suture thread (asterisk). (D) Continuous suture showing a gap filled with fibrin between the two arterial ends (arrows) and normal endothelium at both sides (arrowheads). (E) Simple interrupted suture showing signs of regeneration consisting of endothelial cells (arrowhead) covering the suture thread (asterisk). (F) Sleeve suture showing the proximal (arrowhead) and distal (double arrowhead) segments with neoendothelization (arrow).

Reference

1. Acland RD, Trachtenberg L. The histopathology of small arteries following experimental microvascular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977. 60:868–875.

2. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 1990. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;113–305.

3. Chen YX, Chen LE, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular anastomosis. J Hand Surg [AM]. 2001. 26:530–539.

4. Ching S, Thoma A, Monkman S, Kelton JG. Inhibition of microsurgical thrombosis by the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist SR121566A. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003. 112:177–185.

5. Cobbett J. Small vessel anastomosis. A comparison of suture techniques. Br J Plast Surg. 1967. 20:16–20.

6. Furka I, Brath E, Nemeth N, Miko I. Learning microsurgical suturing and knotting techniques: comparative data. Microsurgery. 2006. 26:4–7.

7. Harris GD, Finseth F, Buncke HJ. The microvascular anastomotic autogenous cuff. Br J Plast Surg. 1981. 34:50–52.

8. Hung LK, Au KK, Ho YF. Comparative study of artery cuff and fat wrap in microvascular anastomosis in the rat. Br J Plast Surg. 1988. 41:278–283.

9. Kanaujia RR. Micro-arterial anastomosis using only two sutures and an autogenous cuff. J Hand Surg [Br]. 1988. 13:44–49.

10. Lauritzen C. A new and easier way to anastomose microvessels. An experimental study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978. 12:291–294.

11. Lauritzen C, Bagge U. A technical and biomechanical comparison between two types of microvascular anastomoses. An experimental study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979. 13:417–421.

12. Lee BY, Thoden WR, Brancato RF, Kavner D, Shaw W, Madden JL. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982. 155:353–357.

13. Lidman D, Daniel RK. The normal healing process of microvascular anastomoses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981. 15:103–110.

14. Moscona AR, Owen ER. Continuous anastomotic technique in microsurgery. Isr J Med Sci. 1978. 14:979–983.

15. Schubert HM, Hohlrieder M, Falkensammer P, Jeske HC, Moser PL, Kolbitsch C, Biebl M. Bipolar anastomosis technique (BAT) enables "fast-to-do", high-quality venous end-to-end anastomosis in a new vascular model. J Craniofac Surg. 2006. 17:772–778.

16. Simsek T, Eroglu L, Engin MS, Kaplan S, Yildiz L. End-to-end microvascular anastomosis in the rat carotid artery using continuous horizontal mattress sutures. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2006. 22:631–640.

17. Sully L, Nightingale MG, O'Brien BM, Hurley JV. An experimental study of the sleeve technique in microarterial anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982. 70:186–192.

18. Tetik C, Unal MB, Kocaoglu B, Erol B. Use of continuous horizontal mattress suture techniques in microsurgery: an experimental study in rats. J Hand Surg. 2005. 30:587–595.

19. Wieslander JB, Aberg M. Stenosis following end-in-end microarterial anastomosis: an angiographic comparison with the end-to-end technique. J Microsurg. 1982. 3:151–155.